Advertisement

Technical Physics Letters

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 1071–1073 | Cite as

Asymmetry of Ceramic Destruction under a High-Velocity Impact

  • S. A. Zelepugin
  • V. F. Tolkachev
  • A. S. Zelepugin
Article

Abstract

Destruction of ceramic barriers under an axisymmetric high-velocity impact has been studied experimentally. The results of the investigations testify to the existence of a significant influence of the structure of ceramic materials on the process of their destruction. The process becomes asymmetric, which can lead to rotation of the impactor with conservation of its initial direction of motion. There are still no models describing the asymmetric character of high-strength ceramic destruction. The probabilistic approach to describing strength characteristics of materials is a possible approach to creating such models.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. V. Rumyantsev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 42, 923 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. V. Rumyantsev, Tech. Phys. 60, 614 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. J. Holmquist and G. R. Johnson, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 093525 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. I. Kozachuk, A. A. Kozhushko, B. V. Rumyantsev, et al., Int. J. Impact Eng. 29, 385 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Gorel’skii, S. A. Zelepugin, and V. F. Tolkachev, Chem. Phys. Rep. 18 (10–11), 2211 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Cao, S. Zhu, C. Guo, et al., Appl. Compos. Mater. 22, 437 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. V. Saveleva, Yu. V. Bayandin, A. S. Savinykh, G. V. Garkushin, E. A. Lyapunova, S. V. Razorenov, and O. B. Naimark, Tech. Phys. Lett. 41, 579 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. S. Branicio, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, et al., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 1955 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. A. Zelepugin, A. S. Zelepugin, and Yu. F. Khristenko, ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 11, 14560 (2016).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. E. Khorev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 31, 167 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Kilic, S. Bedir, A. Erdik, et al., Mater. Des. 63, 427 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. E. Anderson, Jr., Th. Behner, D. L. Orphal, et al., Int. J. Impact Eng. 35, 661 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Gerasimov, in Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics WCCM-2014, 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics ECCM-2014, and 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECFD-2014, Barcelona, Spain, July 20–25, 2014, Vol. 4, p. 3934.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Gerasimov, D. B. Dobritsa, S. V. Pashkov, and Yu. F. Khristenko, Cosmic Res. 54, 118 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Zelepugin
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. F. Tolkachev
    • 1
  • A. S. Zelepugin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.Tomsk Scientific Center, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations