Plasma Physics Reports

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 638–647 | Cite as

Excitation of helicons by current antennas

  • E. D. Gospodchikov
  • A. V. Timofeev
Oscillations and Waves in Plasma


Depending on the angle θ between the wave vector and the magnetic field, helicons are conventionally divided into two branches: proper helicons (H mode), propagating at small θ, and Trivelpiece–Gould waves (TG mode), propagating at large θ. The latter are close to potential waves and have a significant electric component along the external magnetic field. It is believed that it is these waves that provide electron heating in helicon discharges. There is also commonly believed that current antennas, widely used to ignite helicon discharges, excite essentially nonpotential Н modes, which then transform into TG modes due to plasma inhomogeneity. In this work, it is demonstrated that electromagnetic energy can also be efficiently introduced in plasma by means of TG modes.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. F. Chen, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24, 014001 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. P. Shamrai and V. B. Taranov, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5, 474 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. F. Virko, G. S. Kirichenko, and K. P. Shamrai, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11, 10 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. P. Shamrai, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 7, 499 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Arnush, Phys. Plasmas 7, 3042 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. R. Tynan, M. J. Burin, C. Holland, G. Antar, and N. Crocker, Phys. Plasmas 11, 5195 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. W. Boswell, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 26, 1147 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. V. Timofeev, Plasma Phys. Rep. 41, 873 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Shinohara and T. Tanikawa, Phys. Plasmas 12, 044502 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. G. Shalashov and E. D. Gospodchikov, Phys. Usp. 54, 145 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. A. Bering, III, F. R. Chang-Diaz, I. P. Squire, V. Jacobson, L. D. Cassady, and M. Burkardt, in Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, Reno, NV, 2007, Paper AIAA-2007-586.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. M. Guo, J. Scharer, Y. Mouzouris, and L. Louis, Phys. Plasmas 6, 3400 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesNizhny NovgorodRussia
  2. 2.National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations