Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Anomalous Internal Conversion as a Clue to Solving the 209Bi Puzzle

Nuclei Theory
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

A numerical analysis of the specific-difference (SD) method for eliminating the Bohr–Weisskopf effect in the theory of hyperfine splitting is performed within a more general theory of anomalous nuclear moments. The limiting accuracy of the SD method is demonstrated. In analyzing experimental data on the hyperfine splitting in H- and Li-like ions of 209Bi, it is found that the disagreement between theoretical and experimental results that was reported recently was due to going beyond this theoretical accuracy. Prospects of further experimental and theoretical studies in these realms are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. A. Zon and F. F. Karpeshin, Sov. Phys. JETP 70, 224 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. F. Karpeshin, Zhang Jing-Bo, and Zhang Wei-Ning, Chin. Phys. Lett. 23, 2391 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. F. Karpeshin, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and Zhang Jingbo, Chin. Phys. Lett. 23, 2049 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. F.
    F. Karpeshin, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, and J. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 341 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    F. F. Karpeshin, Prompt Fission in Muon Atoms and Resonance Conversion (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    M. Jung, F. Bosch, K. Beckert, H. Eickhoff, H. Folger, B. Franzke, A. Gruber, P. Kienle, O. Klepper, W. Koenig, C. Kozhuharov, R. Mann, R. Moshammer, F. Nolden, U. Schaaf, G. Soff, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2164 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5a.
    F. Bosch, T. Faestermann, J. Friese, F. Heine, P. Kienle, E. Wefers, K. Zeitelhack, K. Beckert, B. Franzke, O. Klepper, C. Kozhuharov, G. Menzel, R. Moshammer, F. Nolden, H. Reich, B. Schlitt, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5190 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    F. F. Karpeshin, Phys. Rev. C 87, 054319 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, in Proceedings of the 1st African Symposium on Exotic Nuclei, Cape Town, South Africa, Dec. 2–6, 2013, Ed. by E. Cherepanov et al. (World Scientific, New Jersey, London, Singapore, 2014), p.201.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Phys. At. Nucl. 78, 993 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    A. Ya. Dzublik, Phys. Rev. C 90, 054619 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    Niu Wan, Chang Xu, and Zhongzhou Ren, Phys. Rev. C 92, 024301 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    A. Bohr and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 77, 94 (1950).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Nucl. Phys. A 941, 66 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    A. V. Volotka, D. A. Glazov, O. V. Andreev, V. M. Shabaev, I. I. Tupitsyn, and G. Plunien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 073001 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    J. R. Persson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 62 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    V. M. Shabaev, A. N. Artemyev, V. A. Yerokhin, O. M. Zherebtsov, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3959 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    A. E. Barzakh, L. Kh. Batist, D. V. Fedorov, V. S. Ivanov, K. A. Mezilev, P. L. Molkanov, F. V. Moroz, S. Yu. Orlov, V. N. Panteleev, and Yu. M. Volkov, Phys. Rev. C 86, 014311 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    J. Ullmann, Z. Andelkovic, C. Brandau, A. Dax, W. Geithner, Ch. Geppert, Ch. Gorges, M. Hammen, V. Hannen, S. Kaufmann, K. König, Y. A. Litvinov, M. Lochmann, B. Maass, J. Meisner, et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 15484 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    M. Lochmann, R. Jöhren, Ch. Geppert, Z. Andelkovic, D. Anielski, B. Botermann, M. Bussmann, A. Dax, N. Frömmgen, M. Hammen, V. Hannen, T. Kühl, Y. A. Litvinov, R. López-Coto, T. Stöhlker, R. C. Thompson, et al., arXiv: 1401.8224v1.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    M. Lochmann, R. Jöhren, Ch. Geppert, Z. Andelkovic, D. Anielski, B. Botermann, M. Bussmann, A. Dax, N. Frömmgen, M. Hammen, V. Hannen, T. Kühl, Y. A. Litvinov, R. López-Coto, T. Stöhlker, R. C. Thompson, et al., Phys. Rev. A 90, 030501(R) (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    F. F. Karpeshin, M. R. Harston, F. Attallah, J. F. Chemin, J. N. Scheurer, I. M. Band, and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1640 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    P. Beiersdorfer, A. L. Osterheld, J. H. Scofield, J. R. Crespo López-Urrutia, and K. Widmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3022 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    L. A. Sliv, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 21, 770 (1951).Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    L. A. Sliv and V. A. Volchok, PhTI Preprint (Phys. Tech. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, Leningrad, 1956).Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    I. M. Band, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, C. W. Nestor, Jr., P. O. Tikkanen, and S. Raman, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 81, 1 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 24a.
    I. M. Band and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 55, 43 (1993); At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 35, 1 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 25.
    F. F. Karpeshin, I. M. Band, M. A. Listengarten, and L. A. Sliv, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Ser. 40, 58 (1976).Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Hyperfine Interact. 171, 255 (2007); Laser Phys. 17, 508 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 27.
    A. Pérez Galván, Y. Zhao, L. A. Orozco, E. Gómez, A. D. Lange, F. Baumer, and G. D. Sprouse, Phys. Lett. B 655, 114 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM)St. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Petersburg Nuclear Physics InstituteNational Research Center Kurchatov InstituteGatchinaRussia

Personalised recommendations