Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

, Volume 123, Issue 6, pp 957–962 | Cite as

Manipulating transmission and reflection properties of a photonic crystal doped with quantum dot nanostructures

  • G. Solookinejad
  • M. Panahi
  • E. A. Sangachin
  • S. H. Asadpour
Atoms, Molecules, Optics
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The transmission and reflection properties of incident light in a defect dielectric structure is studied theoretically. The defect structure consists of donor and acceptor quantum dot nanostructures embedded in a photonic crystal. It is shown that the transmission and reflection properties of incident light can be controlled by adjusting the corresponding parameters of the system. The role of dipole–dipole interaction is considered as a new parameter in our calculations. It is noted that the features of transmission and reflection curves can be adjusted in the presence of dipole–dipole interaction. It is found that the absorption of weak probe light can be converted to the probe amplification in the presence of dipole–dipole interaction. Moreover, the group velocity of transmitted and reflected probe light is discussed in detail in the absence and presence of dipole–dipole interaction. Our proposed model can be used as a new all-optical devices based on photonic materials doped with nanoparticles.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Wu, J. Saldana, and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013811 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Wu and X. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053806 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    X.-X. Yang, Z.-W. Li, and Y. Wu, Phys. Lett. A 340, 320 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Liu, J. Li, R. Yu, and Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 87, 042306 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Xiong, L. Si, X. Lv, X. Yang, and Y. Wu, Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 58, 050302 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Wang, Opt. Commun. 282, 4745 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z. Wang, B. Yu, J. Zhu, Z. Cao, S. Zhen, X. Wu, et al., Ann. Phys. 327, 1132 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155329 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Li, R. Yu, X. Hao, A. Zheng, and X. Yang, Opt. Commun. 282, 4384 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Li, R. Yu, L. Si, X. Lu, and X. Yang, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 055509 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.-X. Yang, A.-X. Chen, L.-G. Si, K. Jiang, X. Yang, and R.-K. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023814 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.-X. Yang, J.-M. Hou, Y. Lin, and R.-K. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 79, 033825 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W.-X. Yang, S. Liu, Z. Zhu, and R.-K. Lee, Opt. Lett. 40, 3133 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Paspalakis and P. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 66, 015802 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Joshi, S. Hassan, and M. Xiao, Phys. Rev. A 72, 055803 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Dutta and K. R. Dastidar, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, 4287 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Dutta and K. R. Dastidar, Mol. Phys. 110, 431 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Sattari and M. Sahrai, Opt. Commun. 311, 83 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.-X. Yang, W.-H. Ma, L. Yang, G.-R. Zhang, and R.-K. Lee, Opt. Commun. 324, 221 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.-G. Wang, H. Chen, and S.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066602 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Jafari, M. Sahrai, H. Motavalli, and M. Mahmoudi, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063811 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ziauddin, Y.-L. Chuang, R.-K. Lee, and S. Qamar, Laser Phys. 26, 015205 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. R. Singh, J. Mod. Opt. 54, 1739 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. R. Singh, Phys. Lett. A 363, 177 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. R. Singh, Phys. Rev. A 79, 174520 (2009).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. R. Singh, D. G. Schindel, and A. Hatef, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181106 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. D. Cox, M. R. Singh, G. Gumbs, M. A. Anton, and F. Carreno, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125452 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Z. Wang, S. Zhen, and B. Yu, Laser Phys. Lett. 12, 046004 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. R. Singh, C. Racknor, and D. Schindel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 051115 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L.-G. Wang, H. Chen, and S.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. E 70, 066602 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Solookinejad
    • 1
  • M. Panahi
    • 1
  • E. A. Sangachin
    • 1
  • S. H. Asadpour
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Marvdasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityMarvdashtIran

Personalised recommendations