Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 479, Issue 2, pp 415–419 | Cite as

The Younger Age Limit of Metasedimentary Protolith Formation of the Lower Part of the Udokan Group Rocks (Aldan Shield)

  • A. B. Kotov
  • E. B. Salnikova
  • V. P. Kovach
  • S. D. Velikoslavinskii
  • E. V. Sklyarov
  • D. P. Gladkochub
  • A. M. Larin
  • E. V. Tolmacheva
  • A. M. Fedoseenko
  • Yu. V. Plotkina
Geology
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Biotite plagiogranite intruding sediments of the Kodar Sub-Group of the Udokan Group that have both undergone amphibolite grade alterations has been dated by the U–Pb ID TIMS technique using zircon to 2105 ± 6 Ma. This age estimate to a first approximation corresponds to the younger age limit of deposition of the siliciclastics in the lower section of the Udokan Group.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. S. Fedorovskii, Stratigraphy of Lower Proterozoic of Kodar and Udokan Ranges (Nauka, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. G. Berezhnaya, E. V. Bibikova, A. V. Sochava, et al., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 302 (5), 1209–1212 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. M. Larin, A. B. Kotov, E. B. Sal’nikova, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. A 383 (3), 336–340 (2002).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. B. Kotov, N. V. Vladykin, A. M. Larin, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. 463 (1), 663–667 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. V. Popov, A. B. Kotov, A. A. Postnikov, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. 424 (1), 64–67 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. M. Larin, A. B. Kotov, E. B. Sal’nikova, et al., Petrology 8 (3), 238–248 (2000).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. M. Larin, E. B. Sal’nikova, A. B. Kotov, et al., Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 14 (5), 463–474 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. E. Krogh, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 37, 485–494 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. E. Krogh, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 637–649 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. M. Mattinson, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 116, 117–129 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. R. Ludwig, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. No. 88-542 (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. R. Ludwig, ISOPLOT/Ex. Ver. 2.06: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronological Center Spec. Publ. No. 1a (Berkeley Geochronol. Center, Berkeley, CA, 1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. S. Stacey and I. D. Kramers, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 26 (2), 207–221 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. H. Steiger and E. Jager, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 36 (2), 359–362 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. N. Podkovyrov, A. B. Kotov, A. M. Larin, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. 408 (4), 518–522 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. B. Kotov
    • 1
  • E. B. Salnikova
    • 1
  • V. P. Kovach
    • 1
  • S. D. Velikoslavinskii
    • 1
  • E. V. Sklyarov
    • 2
    • 3
  • D. P. Gladkochub
    • 2
  • A. M. Larin
    • 1
  • E. V. Tolmacheva
    • 1
  • A. M. Fedoseenko
    • 1
  • Yu. V. Plotkina
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia
  3. 3.Far East Federal UniversityVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations