Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 473, Issue 1, pp 354–358 | Cite as

Past sedimentation rates and environments of the Mendeleev Rise inferred from Sr isotope and δ18O chemostratigraphy of its Late Cenozoic sediments

  • E. A. Gusev
  • A. B. Kuznetsov
  • E. E. Taldenkova
  • S. D. Nikolaev
  • A. Yu. Stepanova
  • E. S. Novikhina
Geochemistry
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Multiproxy investigation of sediment core AF-0731 from the Mendeleev Rise revealed several epochs of high bioproductivity corresponding to climate amelioration and surface water mass warming in the Arctic. During these periods, sediments became enriched in carbonate microfossils as well as in coarsegrained ice- and iceberg-rafted debris (IRD) that precipitated from melting sea ice and icebergs. Variability in the δ18О composition of planktic foraminifers also reflects glacial-interglacial periodicity. Low δ18О values correspond to glacial epochs and, especially, glacial terminations with strong meltwater inputs. Increased δ18О values characterize interglacial epochs of sea-level rise and growing salinity due to enhanced water exchange with neighboring oceans. The 87Sr/86Sr ratio was measured in foraminifers from basal core layers, and their SIS-age was estimated at 670 + 50 ka. Sedimentation rates at AF-0731 core site on the Mendeleev Rise varied between 0.4 and 0.6 cm/kyr.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. A. Gusev, F. E. Maksimov, E. S. Novikhina, V. Yu. Kuznetsov, S. B. Levchenko, I. E. Zherebtsov, and N. G. Baranova, Vestn. St. Petersburg. Gos. Univ., Ser. 7: Geol. Geogr., No. 4, 102–115 (2012).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. A. Gusev, F. E. Maksimov, V. Yu. Kuznetsov, V. A. Basov, E. S. Novikhina, N. V. Kupriyanova, S. B. Levchenko, and I. E. Zherebtsov, Dokl. Earth Sci. 450 (2), 602–606 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. D. Danilov, E. V. Telepnev, A. B. Chugunov, N. V. Belyaeva, T. A. Khusid, E. I. Virina, and E. I. Polyakova, Okeanologiya 31 (1), 108–116 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. A. Krylov, V. V. Shilov, I. A. Andreeva, and E. S. Mirolyubova, Probl. Arkt. Antarkt., No. 2 (88), 7–22 (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. B. Kuznetsov, M. A. Semikhatov, and I. M. Gorokhov, Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 20 (6), 501–515 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. L. Piskarev, I. A. Andreeva, and E. G. Gus’kova, Oceanology 53 (5), 620–629 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. V. Chernyshev, K. N. Shatagin, and Yu. V. Gol’tsman, Geochem. Int. 38 (12), 1175–1187 (2000).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. E. Adler, L. Polyak, J. D. Ortiz, D. S. Kaufman, J.-E. T. Channell, Ch. Xuan, A. G. Grottoli, E. Selln, and K. A. Crawford, Global Planet. Change 68, 18–29 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. L. Clark, R. R. Whitman, K. A. Morgan, and S. D. Mackey, Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Pap., No. 181, 57 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. M. Cronin, L. Polyak, D. Reed, E. S. Kandiano, R. E. Marzen, and E. A. Council, Quat. Sci. Rev. 79, 157–167 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. M. McArthur, R. J. Howarth, and T. R. Bailey, J. Geol. 109 (2), 155–169 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Not and C. Hillaire-Marcel, Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 3665–3675 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Pillans and P. Gibbard, in The Geologic Time Scale 2012, Ed. by F. M. Gradstein, J. G. Ogg, M. Schmitz, and G. Ogg (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012), Chap. 30, pp. 979–1010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Polyak, W. B. Curry, D. A. Darby, J. Bischof, and T. M. Cronin, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 203, 73–93 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Stein, J. Matthiessen, F. Niessen, A. Krylov, Nam S-il, and E. Bazhenova, Polarforschung 79, 97–121 (2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Gusev
    • 1
  • A. B. Kuznetsov
    • 2
  • E. E. Taldenkova
    • 3
  • S. D. Nikolaev
    • 3
  • A. Yu. Stepanova
    • 4
  • E. S. Novikhina
    • 1
  1. 1.Gramberg VNIIOkeangeologiaSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations