• Scientific Session of the General Meeting of Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences “Fundamental Problems in the Development of Modern Russian Society”
  • Published:

The New Cold War: Consequences for Russian Society

Abstract

This report discusses the consequences of the unfolding and deepening crisis in relations between Russia and Western countries, in particular with the United States of America. The author characterizes this period as a Cold War 2.0. There are some similarities and some differences between the new Cold War and the initial stage of tensions between the two countries in the 20th century. The differences include the absence of ideological conflict and the global rivalry of the two socio-economic systems. The specificity of the new Cold War consists in a sharp aggravation of propaganda, the resumption of economic war, and the practical absence of normal diplomatic contacts between the United States and its allies with the Russian Federation, as well as a renewed arms race. The author expresses particular concern about the situation in the field of arms control where the supporting pillars of the system, on which Russia and the United States had been working for half a century, continue to collapse one by one. The threat of nuclear war is becoming increasingly real. Special attention is paid to the correlation of the costs that Russia incurs in the military sphere in connection with the aggravated crisis in relations with Western countries and the spending on social development. Their correlation is presented in terms of macroeconomic indicators, data from sociological surveys, and expert assessments and indicates Russia’s lagging behind leading countries and its overstrain. The author comes to the conclusion that the new Cold War is leading to an increase in international tension and is strengthening long-term negative trends in the economic and social sphere of Russia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.
Fig. 19.

REFERENCES

  1. 1

    https://www.pollingreport.com/russia.htm.

  2. 2

    L. Saad, “Majority of Americans now consider Russia a critical threat,” Gallup, Feb. 27, (2019). https://news.gallup.com/poll/247100/majority-americans-consider-russia-critical-threat.aspx.

  3. 3

    VCIOM poll: No change on the Western Front. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=10009.

  4. 4

    Levada Center poll: “Allies” and “enemies” among countries. https://www.levada.ru/2019/06/14/soyuzniki-i-vragi-sredi-stran/.

  5. 5

    Present at the re-Creation: A global strategy for revitalizing, adapting, and defending a rules-based international system. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/present-at-the-re-creation/.

  6. 6

    https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/10/21/World-Economic-Outlook-October-2019-Global-Manufacturing-Downturn-Rising-Trade-Barriers-48513.

  7. 7

    https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/main-science-and-technology-indicators/volume-2019/issue-1_g2g9fb0e-en#page68.

  8. 8

    https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB#.

  9. 9

    http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/58848.

  10. 10

    World Economic Outlook: Global Manufacturing Downturn, Rising Trade Barriers (International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 2019).

  11. 11

    Sanctions Policy: Goals, Strategies, Instruments: Reader, Compiled by I. N. Timofeev and T. A. Makhmutov, Ed. by I. S. Ivanov, A. V. Kortunov, and I. N. Timofeev (NP RSMD, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Economic Cooperation between Russia and the United States in the Face of Uncertainty (RSPP, Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

  13. 13

    “Federal budget for 2020–2022: Key parameters,” Economy Times, Oct. 30 (2019). http://economytimes.ru/kurs-rulya/federalnyy-byudzhet-na-2020-2022-gody-osnovnye-parametry.

  14. 14

    http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update_ru.pdf.

  15. 15

    https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.

  16. 16

    https://www.iep.ru/ru/publikatcii/publication/monitoring-ekonomicheskoy-situatsii-v-rossii-16-99-oktyabr-2019-g.html.

  17. 17

    http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/61792.

  18. 18

    https://www.interfax.ru/business/677950.

  19. 19

    SIPRI Yearbook 2017 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  20. 20

    Military-Economic Development in the Context of Global Transformations, Ed. by. L. V. Pankova, S. U. Kazennov, and O. V. Gusarova (IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    “Underfunding prescribed to Russian healthcare,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Oct. 24 (2019). http://www.ng.ru/economics/2019-10-24/4_7711_medicine.html.

  22. 22

    Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en.

  23. 23

    2019 Global Health Security Index. https://www.ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf.

  24. 24

    “Russians do not have enough money for knowledge,” Kommersant, Oct. 11 (2019). https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4120141.

  25. 25

    https://ria.ru/20191105/1560607848.html. Cited November 6, 2019.

  26. 26

    http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/61986. Cited November 6, 2019.

  27. 27

    https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/social-spending.htm.

  28. 28

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/03/world/europe/eu-farm-subsidy-hungary.html.

  29. 29

    https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17833.

  30. 30

    https://mises.org/wire/farm-subsidies-are-corporate-welfare-%E2%80%94-and-they-cost-us-plenty.

  31. 31

    http://government.ru/docs/37271/.

  32. 32

    Science, technologies, innovations. https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/12/11/1144786145/niio2019.pdf.

  33. 33

    “US state funding of science exceeded Russian by 33 times,” Moskovskii Komsomolets, Nov. 8 (2019). https://www.mk.ru/economics/2019/11/08/gosfinansirovanie-nauki-v-ssha-prevysilo-rossiyskoe-v-33-raza.html.

  34. 34

    “The budget for education and science for 2020–2022 contradicts Putin’s decrees,” Moskovskii Komsomolets, Oct. 10 (2019). https://www.mk.ru/economics/2019/10/10/byudzhet-obrazovaniya-i-nauki-na-20202022-gody-protivorechit-ukazam-putina.html.

  35. 35

    Government Expenditures on Defense Research and Development by the United States and Other OECD Countries: Fact Sheet. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20181219_R45441_4a85f752f0ce0178b12d3479a348a1920252f4aa.pdf.

  36. 36

    “Academy of the chosen: President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexander Sergeev: 55 mathematicians apply for one corresponding-member vacancy,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Nov. 5 (2019). https://rg.ru/2019/11/05/prezident-ran-uchenye-dolzhny-uchastvovat-v-sozdanii-nauchnoj-politiki-strany.html.

  37. 37

    It turned out as always. RAS scientists assess reform. https://www.poisknews.ru/news/poluchilos-kak-vsegda-uchenye-ran-dali-oczenku-reforme/. Cited November 1, 2019.

  38. 38

    The FIAN Scientific Council called intimidation the actions of security forces during searches at the institute, Interfax, Nov. 1 (2019). https://www.interfax.ru/russia/682728.

  39. 39

    Global Innovation Index 2019. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2019-report.

  40. 40

    https://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance-22214399.htm.

  41. 41

    https://echo.msk.ru/blog/nikolaev_i/2531643-echo/.

  42. 42

    https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/publication/lcc/americans-and-russians-agree-were-heading-towards-new-arms-race.

  43. 43

    http://www.publicconsultation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Nuclear_Weapons_Report_0519.pdf.

  44. 44

    Rasmussen Report. August 30, 2019. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/russia/trump_getting_tougher_voters_say_but_most_want_russia_as_a_friend.

  45. 45

    http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/61991.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is grateful to a researcher of the IUSCS RAS N.V. Stepanova and to laboratory assistants and researchers of IUSCS RAS K.V. Vorob’eva and K.S. Chestnyagina for their assistance in the preparation of this report.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Rogov.

Additional information

Translated by I. Pertsovskaya

RAS Acadenician Sergei Mikhailovich Rogov is Scientific Supervisor of the RAS IUSCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogov, S.M. The New Cold War: Consequences for Russian Society. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 90, 189–200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620020070

Download citation

Keywords:

  • Russian–American relations
  • Cold War
  • social and economic development
  • R&D
  • arms control.