Advertisement

Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 150–156 | Cite as

Basic science as a crucial element in the modern system of national security

  • G. A. Lavrinov
  • E. Yu. Khrustalev
  • O. E. Khrustalev
Science and Society

Abstract

The role of basic science in qualitative improvement of the national defense potential is considered. The exceptional strategic importance of the results obtained during basic research for military security and the necessity to expand their practical application for these purposes are shown. The authors propose to increase the efficiency of the organizational mechanism of control of defense-oriented basic research and discuss possible consequences of the reorganization of the Russian Academy of Sciences in terms of Russia’s defense potential.

Keywords

basic science defense potential defense–industrial complex weapons and military equipment military security military expenditures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. A. Venediktov, “Military–economic analysis of measures for social support of soldiers,” Vooruzh. Ekon., No. 4, 4–11 (2008).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Kokoshin, “Strategic nuclear and nonnuclear deterrence: Modern priorities,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 84 (2), 59–68 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. A. Lavrinov, A. A. Kosenko, and G. V. Babkin, Economic Aspects of the Military–Technological Policy of the Russian Federation at the Current Stage (Granitsa, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Faramazyan, “Military-economic science and the authority,” Ekon. Nauka Sovremennoi Ross., No. 1, 216–217 (2008).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. F. Vikulov, The Economy of Military Construction: The Evolution of Opinions on Problems, Methods, Solutions (Granitsa, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. F. Vikulov and V. Ya. Trofimets, “Assessment of the military-economic efficiency of military construction,” Vooruzh. Ekon., No. 1, 51–77 (2009).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. F. Vikulov and E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Russia’s military economy: A scientific discipline and an industry,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otnosh., No. 7, 56–63 (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. F. Vikulov and E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Military-economic analysis of Russia’s current defense problems,” Ekon. Analiz: Teor. Prak., No. 12, 2–9 (2012).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Yu. Khrustalev, “The intellectual potential and capital of the Russian defense–industrial complex: The methodological aspect,” Nats. Interesy: Prioritety Bezopasnost’, No. 1, 6–14 (2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Financial–economic and scientific–productive problems of the military security of a state,” Audit Finans. Analiz, Nos. 2, 3, 204–215 (2011).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. A. Kokoshin, “Strategic stability: Scientific-technological, military, and political aspects,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 85 (6), 467–473 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. N. Avdonin and E. Yu. Khrustalev, The Methodology of Organizational and Economic Development of Science- Intensive Factories (Nauka, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. M. Burenok, G. A. Lavrinov, and E. Yu. Khrustalev, Control Mechanisms of Military Goods Production (Nauka, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. A. Kosenko, O. E. Khrustalev, and G. V. Babkin, “Financial–economic and institutional consolidation of science-intensive and high-tech production,” Finansovaya Analitika: Problemy Resheniya, No. 22, 12–22 (2013).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. N. Rassadin and E. Yu. Khrustalev, “The role of technologies and dual-use goods in the development of a national economy and its defense potential,” Nats. Interesy: Prioritety Bezopasnost’, No. 34, 2–8 (2012).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. A. Faramazyan, “Globalization of military-economic activity,” Vopr. Ekon. Nauk, No. 4, 173–175 (2007).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. V. Sivkov, “Teleportation and arms of the future: Scientists on the verge of discoveries that would cardinally change the means and ways of conducting armed struggle,” Voenno-Promyshlennyi Kur’er, No. 19, 10 (2013).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. M. Burenok, E. V. Gorgola, and S. F. Vikulov, Russia’s National Security in the Epoch of Netwars (Granitsa, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Global military confrontation and a methodology of assessing Russia’s defense potential,” Nats. Interesy: Prioritety Bezopasnost’, No. 9, 2–11 (2013).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Russia’s defense potential in the context of current international competition and globalization,” Nats. Interesy: Prioritety Bezopasnost’, No. 7, 2–14 (2012).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. F. Vikulov and E. Yu. Khrustalev, “Russia’s defense–industrial complex: Financial-economic and institutional analysis,” Audit Finans. Analiz, No. 1, 97–111 (2010).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Yu. Korchak, “They will simply crush us: Today nuclear arms are not sufficient to deter aggressive sentiments from the outside,” Voenno-Promyshlennyi Kur’er, No. 19, 6 (2013).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. G. Shipunov, “Which is better: to buy arms abroad or outfit the Russian army with domestic arms?,” Nats. Oborona, No. 2, 17–23 (2013).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Report on the Status of Competition in the Russian Federation (Draft) (Federal’naya Antimonopol’naya Sluzhba, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. M. Burenok, A. A. Ivlev, and V. Yu. Korchak, Program–Target Planning and Control during the Creation of Scientific–Technological Groundwork for Perspective and Nontraditional Arms (Granitsa, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. A. Lavrinov, E. Yu. Khrustalev, A. A. Kosenko, and G. V. Babkin, “Transformation of basic research results into factors of improvement of Russia’s defense potential,” Nats. Interesy: Prioritety Bezopasnost’, No. 34, 2–9 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Lavrinov
    • 1
  • E. Yu. Khrustalev
    • 2
  • O. E. Khrustalev
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Central Economics and Mathematical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations