Advertisement

Thermal Engineering

, Volume 64, Issue 5, pp 336–344 | Cite as

Fast reactor: an experimental study of thermohydraulic processes in different operating regimes

  • A. N. Opanasenko
  • A. P. Sorokin
  • D. G. Zaryugin
  • A. A. Trufanov
Nuclear Power Plants
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Results of integrated water model studies of temperature fields and a flow pattern of a nonisothermal primary coolant in the elements of the fast neutron reactor (hereinafter, fast reactor) primary circuit with primary sodium in different regimes, such as forced circulation (FC), transition to the reactor cooldown and emergency cooldown with natural coolant convection, are presented. It is shown that, under the influence of lift forces on the nonisothermal coolant flow in the upper chamber at the periphery of its bottom region over the side shields, a stable cold coolant isothermal zone is formed, whose dimensions increase with increase of total water flowrate. An essential and stable coolant temperature stratification is detected in the peripheral area of the upper (hot) chamber over the side shields, in the pressure and cold side chambers, in the elevator baffle, in the cooling system of the reactor vessel, and in the outlet of intermediate and autonomous heat exchangers in different operating regimes. Large gradients and temperature fluctuations are registered at the interface of stratified and recycling formations. In all of the studied cooldown versions, the coolant outlet temperature at the core fuel assembly is decreased and the coolant temperature in the peripheral zone of the upper chamber is increased compared to the FC. High performance of a passive emergency cooldown system of a fast reactor (BN-1200) with submersible autonomous heat exchangers (AHE) is confirmed. Thus, in a normal operation regime, even in case of malfunction of three submersible AHEs, the temperature of the equipment inside the reactor remains within acceptable limits and decay heat removal from the reactor does not exceed safe operation limits. The obtained results can be used both for computer code verification and for approximate estimate of the reactor plant parameters on the similarity criteria basis.

Keywords

fast reactor emergency heat removal system autonomous heat exchanger core upper chamber forced circulation transient regimes emergency cooldown temperature field stratification temperature fluctuations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. A. Goverdovskii, S. G. Kalyakin, and V. I. Rachkov, “The alternative strategies of the development of the nuclear power industry in the 21st century,” Therm. Eng. 61, 319–326 (2014). doi 10.1134/S0040601514050048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. G. Zaryugin, V. M. Poplavskii, V. I. Rachkov, A. P. Sorokin, Yu. E. Shvetsov, S. A. Rogozhkin, and S. F. Shepelev, “Computational and experimental validation of the planned emergency heat-removal system for BN-1200,” At. Energy 116, 271–277 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Rachkov, S. G. Kalyakin, O. F. Kukharchuk, Yu. I. Orlov, and A. P. Sorokin, “From the first nuclear power plant to fourth-generation nuclear power installations [on the 60th anniversary of the world’s first nuclear power plant],” Therm. Eng. 61, 327–336 (2014). doi 10.1134/S0040601514050073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Proc. of Specialists Meeting of IAEA Oarai Engineering Center on Evaluation of Decay Heat Removal by Natural Convection, Oarai, Japan, Feb. 22–23, 1993 (IAEA, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. A. Ushakov and A. P. Sorokin, “Role of the Reynolds number in modeling natural convection in liquid metals,” At. Energy 84, 314–319 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. M. Matyukhin, A. N. Opanasenko, R. S. Pomet’ko, and A. P. Sorokin, “Unsteady-state natural convection and problems of simulation of fast reactor primary circuit thermal hydraulics under emergency cool-down conditions,” in Proc. 11th Int. Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-11), Avignon, France, Oct. 2–6, 2005 (NURETH-11, 2005).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. N. Opanasenko, A. P. Sorokin, D. G. Zaryugin, and V. I. Rachkov, “Coolant stratification in nuclear power facilities,” At. Energy 111, 172–178 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. A. Ushakov and A. P. Sorokin, “Modeling problems of emergency natural convection heat removal in the upper plenum of LMR using water,” in Proc. 9th Int. Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-9), California, San Francisco, Oct. 3–8, 1999 (NURETH-9, 1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. A. Ushakov, A. P. Sorokin, and N. M. Matyukhin, “The role of hydraulic resistances in simulating natural convection in vessels of fast reactors using water,” Therm. Eng. 47, 383–389 (2000).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. A. Ushakov and A. P. Sorokin, “Modeling problems of emergency natural convection heat removal in the upper plenum of LMR using water,” in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-8), Baltimore, MD, Apr. 2–6, 2000 (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 2000), Paper id. ICONE-8078.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. M. Matjukhin and A. P. Sorokin, “Transient natural circulation and issues of modeling thermohydraulic in the primary circuit of fast reactors in conditions of decay heat removal,” in Proc. 11th Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Research (IAHR) Working Group on Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer in Reactor Components Cooled by Liquid Coolant in Single/Two-Phase, Obninsk, July 5–9, 2004 (IAEA, Vienna, 2005), pp. 420–427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Opanasenko
    • 1
  • A. P. Sorokin
    • 1
  • D. G. Zaryugin
    • 1
  • A. A. Trufanov
    • 1
  1. 1.Leypunsky Institute of Physics and Power EngineeringKaluga oblast, ObninskRussia

Personalised recommendations