# Invariant manifolds and Lax pairs for integrable nonlinear chains

- 57 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

We continue the previously started study of the development of a direct method for constructing the Lax pair for a given integrable equation. This approach does not require any addition assumptions about the properties of the equation. As one equation of the Lax pair, we take the linearization of the considered nonlinear equation, and the second equation of the pair is related to its generalized invariant manifold. The problem of seeking the second equation reduces to simple but rather cumbersome calculations and, as examples show, is effectively solvable. It is remarkable that the second equation of this pair allows easily finding a recursion operator describing the hierarchy of higher symmetries of the equation. At first glance, the Lax pairs thus obtained differ from usual ones in having a higher order or a higher matrix dimensionality. We show with examples that they reduce to the usual pairs by reducing their order. As an example, we consider an integrable double discrete system of exponential type and its higher symmetry for which we give the Lax pair and construct the conservation laws.

## Keywords

Lax pair integrable chain higher symmetry invariant manifold recursion operator## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, “A scheme for integrating the nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of the inverse scattering problem: I,”
*Funct. Anal. Appl.*,**8**, 226–235 (1974).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 2.V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, “Integration of nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of inverse scattering: II,”
*Funct. Anal. Appl.*,**13**, 166–174 (1979).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 3.H. D. Wahlquist and F. B. Estabrook, “Prolongation structures of nonlinear evolution equations,”
*J. Math. Phys.*,**16**, 1–7 (1975).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 4.F. W. Nijhoff and A. J. Walker, “The discrete and continuous Painlevé VI hierarchy and the Garnier system,”
*Glasgow Math. J.*,**43**, No. A, 109–123 (2001).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.A. I. Bobenko and Yu. B. Suris, “Integrable systems on quad-graphs,”
*Int. Math. Res. Notices*,**2002**, 573–611 (2002).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 6.F. W. Nijhoff, “Lax pair for the Adler (lattice Krichever–Novikov) system,”
*Phys. Lett. A*,**297**, 49–58 (2002).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 7.R. I. Yamilov, “On the classification of discrete equations [in Russian],” in:
*Integrable Systems*(A. B. Shabat, ed.), Bashkir State Univ., Ufa (1982), pp. 95–114.Google Scholar - 8.P. Xenitidis, “Integrability and symmetries of difference equations: The Adler–Bobenko–Suris case,” in:
*Proc. IV Workshop “Group Analysis of Differential Equations and Integrable Systems” (GADEIS–IV)*(Protaras, Cyprus, 26–30 October 2008, N. Ivanova, C. Sophocleous, R. Popovych, P. Damianou, and A. Nikitin, eds.), Univ. of Patras, Greece (2008), pp. 226–242; arXiv:0902.3954v1 [nlin.SI] (2009).Google Scholar - 9.F. Khanizadeh, A. V. Mikhailov, and J. P. Wang, “Darboux transformations and recursion operators for differential–difference equations,”
*Theor. Math. Phys.*,**177**, 1606–1654 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 10.I. T. Habibullin, A. R. Khakimova, and M. N. Poptsova, “On a method for constructing the Lax pairs for nonlinear integrable equations,”
*J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.*,**49**, 035202 (2016).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 11.R. I. Yamilov, “Classification of discrete evolution equations [in Russian],”
*Uspekhi Mat. Nauk*,**38**, 155–156 (1983).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 12.V. E. Adler, A. I. Bobenko, and Yu. B. Suris, “Classification of integrable equations on quad-graphs: The consistency approach,”
*Commun. Math. Phys.*,**233**, 513–543 (2003).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 13.B. I. Suleimanov, “The ‘quantum’ linearization of the Painlevé equations as a component of their L,A pairs [in Russian],”
*Ufimsk. Mat. Zh.*,**4**, 127–135 (2012).Google Scholar - 14.N. Kh. Ibragimov and A. B. Shabat, “The Korteweg–de Vries equation from the point of view of transformation groups,”
*Sov. Phys. Dokl.*,**24**, 15–17 (1979).ADSMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.N. Kh. Ibragimov and A. B. Shabat, “Evolutionary equations with nontrivial Lie–B¨acklund group,”
*Funct. Anal. Appl.*,**14**, 19–28 (1980).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.R. Garifullin, I. Habibullin, and M. Yangubaeva, “Affine and finite Lie algebras and integrable Toda field equations on discrete space–time,”
*SIGMA*,**8**, 062 (2012).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - 17.S. I. Svinolupov and R. I. Yamilov, “The multi-field Schrödinger lattices,”
*Phys. Lett. A*,**160**, 548–552 (1991).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.R. I. Yamilov, “Symmetries as integrability criteria for differential difference equations,”
*J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.*,**39**, R541–R623 (2006).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.M. Gürses, A. Karasu, and V. V. Sokolov, “On construction of recursion operators from Lax representation,”
*J. Math. Phys.*,**40**, 6473–6490 (1999).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 20.V. G. Drinfeld and V. V. Sokolov, “Lie algebras and equations of Korteweg–de Vries type,”
*J. Soviet Math.*,**30**, 1975–2036 (1985).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 21.I. T. Habibullin, “Discrete Zakharov–Shabat systems and integrable equations [in Russian],”
*Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI*,**146**, 137–146 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 22.A. V. Mikhailov, “Formal diagonalisation of Lax–Darboux schemes,”
*Model. Anal. Inform. Sist.*,**22**, 795–817 (2015).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, and J. Suzuki, “
*T*-systems and*Y*-systems in integrable systems,”*J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.*,**44**, 103001 (2011); arXiv:1010.1344v5 [hep-th] (2010).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 24.R. S. Ward, “Discrete Toda field equations,”
*Phys. Lett. A*,**199**, 45–48 (1995).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 25.R. Willox and M. Hattori, “Discretisations of constrained KP hierarchies,”
*J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo*,**22**, 613–661 (2015); arXiv:1406.5828v1 [nlin.SI] (2014).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar