Siberian Mathematical Journal

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 943–951 | Cite as

On a Certain Sub-Riemannian Geodesic Flow on the Heisenberg Group

Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Under study is an integrable geodesic flow of a left-invariant sub-Riemannian metric for a right-invariant distribution on the Heisenberg group. We obtain the classification of the trajectories of this flow. There are a few examples of trajectories in the paper which correspond to various values of the first integrals. These trajectories are obtained by numerical integration of the Hamiltonian equations. It is shown that for some values of the first integrals we can obtain explicit formulae for geodesics by inverting the corresponding Legendre elliptic integrals.

Keywords

sub-Riemannian geometry geodesic flow left-invariant metric 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Taimanov I. A., “Integrable geodesic flows of nonholonomic metrics,” J. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 3, no. 1, 129–147 (1997).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boscain U. and Rossi F., “Invariant Carnot–Carathéodory metrics on S 3, SO(3), SL(2) and lens spaces,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 47, no. 4, 1851–1878 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myasnichenko O., “Nilpotent (3, 6) sub-Riemannian problem,” J. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, 573–597 (2002).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moiseev I. and Sachkov Yu. L., “Maxwell strata in sub-Riemannian problem on the group of motions of a plane,” ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., vol. 16, no. 2, 380–399 (2010).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berestovskiĭ V. N., “Geodesics of nonholonomic left-invariant intrinsic metrics on the Heisenberg group and isoperimetric curves on the Minkowski plane,” Sib. Math. J., vol. 35, no. 1, 1–8 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mazhitova A. D., “The geodesic flow of a sub-Riemannian metric on a solvable Lie group,” Siberian Adv. Math., vol. 23, no. 2, 99–105 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vershik A. M. and Gershkovich V. Ya., “Nonholonomic dynamical systems, geometry of distributions and variational problems,” in: Dynamical Systems. VII. Encycl. Math. Sci. Vol. 16, 1994, 1–81.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pontryagin L. S., Boltyanskii V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., and Mishchenko E. F., The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, John Wiley and Sons, New York and London (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agrachev A. A. and Sachkov Yu. L., Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2004).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnol’d V. I., Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics [Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974).MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mazhitova A. D., “The normal sub-Riemannian geodesic flow on E(2) generated by a left-invariant metric and a rightinvariant distribution,” Sib. Math. J., vol. 55, no. 5, 948–953 (2014).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gradshteĭn I. S. and Ryzhik I. M., Tables of Integrals, Sums, Series, and Products, Academic Press, Boston (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bateman H. and Erdélyi A., Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. 3: Elliptic and Automorphic Functions, Lamé and Mathieu Functions, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York (1955).MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of MathematicsNovosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations