Advertisement

Physics of Metals and Metallography

, Volume 119, Issue 3, pp 301–308 | Cite as

Influence of Heat Treatments on the Fracture Toughness of 2017A Aluminium Alloy

  • L. Hemmouche
  • A. Meghalet
  • A. Henni Chebra
Strength and Plasticity
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The present study was carried out on 2017A aluminium alloy, in order to determine the influence of heat treatments on the fracture toughness determined by three point bending tests and empirical formula correlations used Charpy impact energy. The three point bending test has shown that the minimum values of fracture toughness and maximum load were found in the annealed state. Moreover, the hardening heat treatment increases them considerably, especially in the artificially aged condition of the alloy where it provided the maximum values. Schindler’s empirical formula gave the best estimation of fracture toughness in all metallurgical states of 2017A aluminium alloy.

Keywords

heat treatments fracture toughness Charpy impact energy 2017A aluminium alloy three point bending tests 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Viswanathan, Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High Temperature Components (ASM Int., 1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM E-399, “Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIC of metallic materials”, 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. O. Ritchie, J F. Knott, and J. R. Rice, “On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel,” J. Mechan. Phys. Solids 21, 395–410 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Rossoll, C. Berdin, C. Prioul, “Determination of the fracture toughness of a low alloy steel by the instrumented Charpy impact test,” Int. J. Fracture 115, 205–226 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. J. Schindler and U. Morf, “A closer look at estimation of fracture toughness from Charpy V-notch tests,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 55, 203–212 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Salemi, “The effect of microstructure on estimation of the fracture toughness (KIC) rotor steel using Charpy absorbed energy (CVN),” J. Adv. Mater. Process. 1, 11–17 (2013).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Ghosh, P. Modak, R. Dutta, and D. Chakrabarti, “Effect of MnS inclusion and crystallographic texture on anisotropy in Charpy impact toughness of low carbon ferritic steel,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 654, 298–308 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Lan, X. Kong, Ch. Qiu, and D. Zhao, “Influence of microstructural aspects on impact toughness of multipass submerged arc welded HSLA steel joints,” Mater. Design 90, 488–498 (2016). doi 10.1016/j.matdes. 2015.10.158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Terán, S. Capula-Colindres, D. Angeles-Herrera, J. C. Velázquez, and M. J. Fernández-Cueto, “Estimation of fracture toughness KIC from Charpy impact test data in T-welded connections repaired by grinding and wet welding,” Eng. Fracture Mechan. 153, 351–359 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. D. Alexopoulos, “Impact properties of the aircraft cast aluminium alloy Al-7Si0.6Mg (A357),” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Exper. Mechan., Poitiers, France, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Hemmouche, C. Fares, and M. A. Belouchrani, “Influence of heat treatments and anodization on fatigue life of 2017A alloy,” Eng. Failure Anal. 35, 554–561 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Fares, L. Hemmouche, M.A. Belouchrani, A. Amrouche, D. Chicot, and E. S. Puchi-Cabrera, “Coupled effects of substrate microstructure and sulphuric acid anodizing on fatigue life of a 2017A aluminum alloy,” Mater. Design 86, 723–734 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Engineering LaboratoryPolytechnic Military School, BP17C Bordj El BahriAlgiersAlgeria

Personalised recommendations