Complementary Transformations of Buried Organic Residues and the Ambient Sediment: Results of Long-Term Taphonomic Experiments
- 12 Downloads
Abstract
Long-term (18 month) experiments were conducted, burying soft bodied organisms (Artemia salina, Crustacea) in marine sediment. For the first time in experimental taphonomy, the mineralogical transformation of the sediment that accompanied the process of decomposition was correlated with the degree of preservation. To obtain different quantitative characteristics of preservation, we used four dilutions of marine water (marine water: to fresh water as 1: 0; 1: 1, 1: 4, 1: 9).It was shown that higher dilutions corresponded to lower degrees of preservation. The proportion of kaolinite decreased in the marine sediment and, accordingly, the amorphous phase increased; in the diluted variants, the opposite pattern was revealed: the crystalline kaolinite phase increased and the amorphous phase decreased. Since no differences in the chemical composition of the residues from different dilutions were identified, the effect of sea salt concentration on preservation was considered to be negligible. A plausible hypothesis suggested that dissolving of kaolinite slows of organic decomposition and the beginnings of mineralization. Due to the acidic hydrolysis of kaolinite, Al cations appear in the solution; subsequently proteins are converted into insoluble forms, and thus escape from bacterial degradation. These taphonomic experiments reveal some overlooked physicochemical aspects important for the mechanisms of exceptional preservation.
Keywords
experimental taphonomy Lagerstätten fossilization marine sediments kaolinitePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allison, P.A., The role of anoxia in the decay and mineralization of proteinaceous macro-fossils, Paleobiology, 1988, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berner, R.A., Calcium carbonate concretions formed by the decomposition of organic matter, Science, 1968, vol. 159, no. 3811, pp. 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bortnikov, N.S., Novikov, V.M., Savko, A.D., Boeva, N.M., Zhegallo, E.A., Bushueva, E.B., Krainov, A.V., and Dmitriev, D.A., Structural-morphological features of kaolinite from clayey rocks subjected to different stages of lithogenesis: Evidence from the Voronezh anteclise, Lithol. Miner. Resour., 2013, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boswell, P.G.H., Muddy Sediments: Some Geotechnical Studies for Geologists, Engineers and Soil Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1961.Google Scholar
- Butler, A.D., Cunningham, J.A., Budd, G.E., and Donoghue, P.C.J., Experimental taphonomy of Artemia reveals the role of endogenous microbes in mediating decay and fossilization, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2015, vol. 282, no. 1808, p. 20150476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butterfield, N.J., Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian explosion, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2003, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butterfield, N.J., Balthasar, U., and Wilson, L.A., Fossil diagenesis in the Burgess Shale, Palaeontology, 2007, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Chaffoy de Courcelles, D., and Kondo, M., Lipovitellin from the crustacean, Artemia salina, biochemical analysis of lipovitellin complex from the yolk granules, J. Biol. Chem., 1980, vol. 255, no. 14, pp. 6727–6733.Google Scholar
- Dzik, J., Zhao Yuan-long, and Zhu Mao-yan, Mode of life of the Middle Cambrian eldonioid lophophorate Rotadiscus, Palaeontology, 1997, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 385–396.Google Scholar
- Fiore, S., Huertas, F.J., Huertas, F., and Linares, J., Morphology of kaolinite crystals synthesized under hydrothermal conditions, Clays Clay Miner., 1995, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forchielli, A., Steiner, M., Kasbohm, J., Hu Shi-xue, and Keupp, H., Taphonomic traits of clay-hosted early Cambrian Burgess Shale-type fossil Lagerstätten in South China, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2014, vol. 398, pp. 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gabbott, S.E., Zalasiewicz, J., and Collins, D., Sedimentation of the Phyllopod Bed within the Cambrian Burgess Shale Formation of British Columbia, J. Geol. Soc., 2008, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaines, R.R., Hammarlund, E.U., Hou Xian-guang, Qi Chang-shi, Gabbott, S.E., Zhao Yuan-long, Peng Jin, and Canfield, D.E., Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2012, vol. 109, no. 14, pp. 5180–5184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gostling, N.J., Dong Xi-ping, and Donoghue, P.C.J., Ontogeny and taphonomy: an experimental taphonomy study of the development of the brine shrimp Artemia salina, Palaeontology, 2009, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horobin, R.W., Acridines and phenanthridines, in Conn’s Biological Stains, A Handbook of Dyes, Stains, and Fluorochromes for Use in Biology and Medicine, Horobin, R.W. and Kiernan, J.A., Eds., Oxford: BIOS Sci. Publ., 2002, 10th ed., Ch. 17, pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
- Lin Jih-pai, Zhao Yuan-long, Rahman, I.A., Xiao Shu-hai, and Wang Yue, Bioturbation in Burgess Shale-type Lagerstätten— Case study of trace fossil–body fossil association from the Kaili Biota (Cambrian Series 3), Guizhou, China, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2010, vol. 292, nos. 1–2, pp. 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, D., Briggs, D.E.G., and Parkes, R.J., Experimental attachment of sediment particles to invertebrate eggs and the preservation of soft-bodied fossils, J. Geol. Soc. (London), 2004, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, D., Briggs, D.E.G., and Parkes, R.J., Decay and mineralization of invertebrate eggs, Palaios, 2005, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 562–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCoy, V.E., Young, RT., and Briggs, D.EG., Factors controlling exceptional preservation in concretions, Palaios, 2015a, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCoy, V.E., Young, R.T., and Briggs, D.E.G., Sediment permeability and the preservation of soft-tissues in concretions: an experimental study, Palaios, 2015b, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 608–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Naimark, E.B., Kalinina, M.A., Shokurov, A.V., Markov, A.V., and Boeva, N.M., Decaying of Artemia salina in clay colloids: 14-month experimental formation of subfossils, J. Paleontol., 2016a, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Naimark, E.B., Kalinina, M.A., Shokurov, A.V., Boeva, N.M., Markov, A.V., and Zaytseva, L.G., Decaying in different clays: implications for soft-tissue preservation, Palaeontology, 2016b, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nemecz, E., Clay Minerals, Budapest: Akad. Kiadó, 1981.Google Scholar
- Page, A., Gabbott, S.E., Wilby, P.R., and Zalasiewicz, J.A., Ubiquitous Burgess Shale-style “clay templates” in lowgrade metamorphic mudrocks, Geology, 2008, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 855–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Towe, K.M., Clay mineral diagenesis as a possible source of silica cement in sedimentary rocks, J. Sediment. Petrol., 1962, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
- Towe, K.M., Fossil preservation in the Burgess Shale, Lethaia, 1996, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Webster, M., Gaines, R.R., and Hughes, N.C., Microstratigraphy, trilobite biostratinomy, and depositional environment of the “Lower Cambrian” Ruin Wash Lagerstätte, Pioche Formation, Nevada, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2008, vol. 264, nos. 1–2, pp. 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilson, L.A. and Butterfield, N.J., Sediment effects on the preservation of Burgess Shale-type compression fossils, Palaios, 2014, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wollanke, G. and Zimmerle, W., Petrographic and geochemical aspects of fossil embedding in exceptionally well preserved fossil deposits, Mitt. Geol.-Paläontol. Inst. Univ. Hamburg, 1990, vol. 69, pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
- Zangerl, R., On the geologic significance of perfectly preserved fossils, Proc. 1st North Am. Paleontol. Convention, Chicago, 1969, Part 1, Lawrence, Kansas: Allen, 1971, vol. 1, pp. 1207–1222.Google Scholar