Advertisement

Optics and Spectroscopy

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 252–261 | Cite as

Light Scattering by Small Multilayer Particles: A Generalized Separation of Variables Method

  • V. G. Farafonov
  • V. I. Ustimov
Physical Optics
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

A Rayleigh approximation is constructed for light scattering by small multilayer axisymmetric particles, in which their polarizability is determined by the generalized separation of variables method (SVM). In this method, scalar potentials, the gradients of which yield the electric-field strengths, are represented as expansions in spherical harmonics of the Laplace equation. Unknown coefficients of expansions are determined from the boundary conditions, which are reduced to infinite systems of linear algebraic equations (ISLAEs), since the separation of variables is incomplete. The T matrix of the electrostatic problem, principal element T11 of which is proportional to the particle polarizability, is determined. The necessary condition for the ISLAEs solvability for the SVM coincides with the condition of the correct application of the extended boundary conditions method (EBCM). However, numerical calculations in which finite-dimensional (i.e., reduced) systems are solved, yield different results in ranges of variation of parameters that are close to the boundary of the range of applicability. An analysis of the numerical calculations of the scattering and absorption cross sections for two-layer confocal spheroids, an exact solution for which can be obtained using spheroidal harmonics, shows that the SVM is preferable to the EBCM. It turned out that the proposed method yields workable results in a wider range of variation of parameters. Even outside the range of applicability, in which it should be regarded as a certain approximate solution, its use in a number of cases is quite acceptable. Additional calculations for three-layer nonconfocal spheroids, as well as for three-layer similar pseudospheroids and Pascal’s snails, which can be obtained from spheroids as a result of the inversion with respect to the coordinate origin and one of the foci, respectively, confirm these inferences. We note that, for certain values of the parameters, the shapes of the latter particles are nonconvex.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Bohren and D. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. M. Morse and G. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953; Inostr. Liter., Moscow, 1960).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 8: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Nauka, Moscow, 1982; Pergamon, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. G. Farafonov, Opt. Spectrosc. 88, 441 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. G. Farafonov, Opt. Spectrosc. 90, 574 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Posselt, V. G. Farafonov, V. B. Il’in, and M. S. Prokopjeva, Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 256 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. G. Farafonov, V. I. Ustimov, and M. V. Sokolovskaya, Opt. Spectrosc. 120, 448 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Farafonov, V. Il’in, V. Ustimov, and E. Volkov, Adv. Math. Phys. 2017, 7862462 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. I. Ustimov, Opt. Spectrosc. 122, 282 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. G. Farafonov, A. A. Vinokurov, and V. B. Il’in, Opt. Spectrosc. 102, 927 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. G. Farafonov, V. Il’in, V. Ustimov, and M. Prokopjeva, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trasfer 178, 176 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. G. Farafonov and A. A. Vinokurov, Opt. Spectrosc. 105, 292 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. A. Vinokurov, V. G. Farafonov, and V. B. Il’in, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trasfer 110, 1356 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. G. Farafonov, Opt. Spectrosc. 117, 923 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. I. Ustimov, Opt. Spectrosc. 119, 1022 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. B. Il’in, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trasfer 146, 244 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. G. Kyurkchan and N. I. Smirnova, Mathematical Modeling in Diffraction Theory Based on A Priori Information on the Analytical Properties of the Solution (Media Pabl., Moscow, 2014; Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. B. Il’in, Opt. Spectrosc. 115, 745 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. G. Farafonov and M. V. Sokolovskaya, J. Math. Sci. 194, 104 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. I. Ustimov, Opt. Spectrosc. 119, 855 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. G. Farafonov and V. I. Ustimov, Opt. Spectrosc. 118, 445 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace InstrumentationSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations