Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DNA Bearing Bulky Fluorescent and Photoreactive Damage in Both Strands as Substrates of the Nucleotide Excision Repair System

  • Molecular Cell Biology
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model DNA molecules that contain bulky lesions in both strands have been created, and their properties as substrates of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system have been analyzed. The modified nucleoside, 5-[3-(4-azido-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamido)-1-propoxypropyl]-2′-deoxycytidine (dCFAB), or the nonnucleoside fragment, N-[6-(9-anthracenylcarbamoyl)hexanoyl]-3-amino-1,2-propanediol (nAnt), have been inserted as damage in certain positions of the first DNA strand (“0”). The position of N-[6-5(6)- fluoresceinylcarbamoyl]hexanoyl]-3-amino-1,2-propanediol (nFlu) has been varied within the second DNA strand. This residue has been located opposite the removable damaging fragment of the first strand at positions–20,–10,–4, 0, +3, and +8 relative to the first lesion). It has been demonstrated that the presence of nFlu at the–4, 0, or +3 position of the second strand significantly reduces the thermostability of DNA duplexes, especially in the case of nAnt-DNA and completely excludes the possibility of NER-catalyzed excision from dCFAB- and nAnt-containing 137-meric DNA with the second lesion at these positions. The introduction of nFlu at positions–20,–10, or +8 differently affects the excision efficiency of dCFAB- and nAntcontaining fragments from the first strand. The excision efficiency of dCFAB-containing fragments from extended double-damaged DNA is as high as from DNA that contains a single dCFAB damage, while the excision of nAnt-containing fragments occurs with 80–90% lower efficiency from double-damaged DNA occurs from DNA that contains the single nAnt insert. The nFlu insert differently affects the interaction of the sensory XPC-HR23B dimer with dCFAB- and nAnt-containing DNAs, although in all cases, this interaction occurs with increased efficiency compared to that with single-damaged DNAs. No direct correlation between the thermostability of the DNA duplex and XPC-DNA affinity on the one hand, and the excision efficiency of lesions on the other hand has been shown. The absence of the correlation may be caused by both functional features of variable multiprotein complexes involved in the recognition and verification of damage during NER and the sensitivity of the complexes to the structure of the damage and damage-surrounding DNA. The results are important for understanding the NER mechanism of elimination of bulky damage located in both DNA strands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP site:

apurinic/apyrimidinic site

ODN:

oligodeoxyribonucleotide(s)

NER:

nucleotide excision repair

dCFAB :

5-[3-(4-azido-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamido)propoxyprop-1-inyl]-2′-deoxycytidine

nAnt:

N-[6-(9-anthracenylcarbamoyl) hexanoyl]-3-amino-1,2-propanediol

nFlu:

N-[6-5(6)-fluoresceinylcarbamoyl) hexanoyl]-3-amino-1,2-propanediol

XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum group C):

protein factor of the NER system responsible for the primary recognition of DNA lesions, DNAbinding subunit

XPC-HR23B:

recombinant sensor dimer of NER

References

  1. Gillet L.C., Scharer O.D. 2006. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian global genome nucleotide excision repair. Chem. Rev. 106, 253–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scharer O.D. 2003. Chemistry and biology of DNA repair. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 42, 2946–2974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petruseva I.O., Evdokimov A.N., Lavrik O.I. 2014. Molecular mechanism of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Acta Naturae. 6, 23–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishi R., Okuda Y., Watanabe E., et al. 2005. Centrin 2 stimulates nucleotide excision repair by interacting with xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5664–5674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dip R., Camenisch U., Naegeli H. 2004. Mechanisms of DNA damage recognition and strand discrimination in human nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair. 3, 1409–1423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherland B.M., Bennett P.V., Sidorkina O., Laval J. 2000. Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 103–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett P., Ishchenko A.A., Laval J., et al. 2008. Endogenous DNA damage clusters in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 45, 1352–1359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Starostenko L.V., Maltseva E.A., Lebedeva N.A., Pestryakov P.E., Lavrik O.I., Rechkunova N.I. 2016. Interaction of nucleotide excision repair protein XPC–RAD23B with DNA containing benzo[a]pyrenederived adduct and apurinic/apyrimidinic site within a cluster. Biochemistry (Moscow). 81 (3), 233–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Z., Ding S., Kropachev K., et al. 2015. Resistance to nucleotide excision repair of bulky guanine adducts opposite abasic sites in DNA duplexes and relationships between structure and function. PLoS One. 10, e0137124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sassa A., Kamoshita N., Kanemaru Y., et al. 2015. Xeroderma pigmentosum group A suppresses mutagenesis caused by clustered oxidative DNA adducts in the human genome. PLoS One. 10, e0142218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lukyanchikova N.V., Petruseva I.O., Evdokimov A.N., et al. 2016. DNA with damage in both strands as affinity probes and nucleotide excision repair substrates. Biochemistry (Moscow). 81, 263–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evdokimov A., Petruseva I., Tsidulko A., et al. 2013. New synthetic substrates of mammalian nucleotide excision repair system. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Reardon J.T., Sancar A. 2006. Purification and characterization of Escherichia coli and human nucleotide excision repair enzyme systems. Methods Enzymol. 408, 189–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smeaton M.B., Miller P.S., Ketner G., Hanakahi L.A. 2007. Small-scale extracts for the study of nucleotide excision repair and non-homologous end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Petruseva I., Tikhanovich I., Chelobanov B., Lavrik O. 2008. RPA repair recognition of DNA containing pyrimidines bearing bulky adducts. J. Mol. Recognit. 21, 154–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petruseva I., Lukyanchikova N., Evdokimov A., et al. 2016. European Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomic Society Annual Meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 14–18, 2016. Abstract Book, p.124.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sugasawa K., Okamoto T., Shimizu Y., et al. 2001. A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 15, 507–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Camenisch U., Trautlein D., Clement F.C., et al. 2009. Two-stage dynamic DNA quality check by xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein. EMBO J. 28, 2387–2399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li L., Perdigao J., Pegg A.E., Lao Y.B., et al. 2009. The influence of repair pathways on the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity induced by the pyridyloxobutylation pathway of tobacco-specific nitrosamines. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22, 1464–1472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang J., Sancar A. 1994. Substrate spectrum of human excinuclease: Repair of abasic sites, methylated bases, mismatches, and bulky adducts. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19034–1904.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

    N. V. Lukyanchikova, I. O. Petruseva, A. N. Evdokimov, L. S. Koroleva & O. I. Lavrik

  2. Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

    O. I. Lavrik

  3. Altai State University, Barnaul, 656049, Russia

    O. I. Lavrik

Authors
  1. N. V. Lukyanchikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. O. Petruseva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. N. Evdokimov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. S. Koroleva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. I. Lavrik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. O. Petruseva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.V. Lukyanchikova, I.O. Petruseva, A.N. Evdokimov, L.S. Koroleva, O.I. Lavrik, 2018, published in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2018, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 277–288.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukyanchikova, N.V., Petruseva, I.O., Evdokimov, A.N. et al. DNA Bearing Bulky Fluorescent and Photoreactive Damage in Both Strands as Substrates of the Nucleotide Excision Repair System. Mol Biol 52, 237–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893318020061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893318020061

Keywords

Search

Navigation