Instruments and Experimental Techniques

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 198–204 | Cite as

Neutron Activator Design for 99Mo Production Yield Estimation via Lead and Water Moderators in Transmutation’s Analysis

  • Abdollah Khorshidi
Nuclear Experimental Techniques


99Mo/99mTc generator is a remarkable radionuclide choice for imaging in nuclear medicine, thereby a neutron activator including two different neutron moderators was devised in a cyclotron-based technique. Neutron activator was designed for 99Mo production via radiative capture using proton beam of compact cyclotron. Neutron production by a 30 MeV proton beam interacting with tungsten target was considered to drive the activator. Fast neutrons were gradually moderated toward resonance energy range of molybdenum using joint moderators including light and heavy materials. Molybdenum transmutation as a result of neutron absorption was appraised via lead and water moderators, surround the target and a graphite reflector around the moderator region. 98Mo spherical samples with different thicknesses were positioned at radial distances from the target inside the diverse regions of the activator. The neuron flux inside the two moderators was comparable as the water rapidly diminished the flux. The greatest 99Mo production yield occurred inside the lead region at 10 cm distance equal to 430.39 ± 0.05 MBq/g for 0.2 cm radius of the sample. Results indicated using heavy moderator reduces the neutron-adiabatic probability over 98Mo resonance peaks therefore neutron capture improves during transmutation process. In comparison with the reactorbased method, a local method for radioisotope production using small and low-current cyclotrons can decrease the expenditures in nuclear medicine policies due to more safety and commercial usages.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Khorshidi, A., Ashoor, M., Hosseini, S.H., and Rajaee, A., J. Nucl. Med. Tech., 2012, vol. 40, p. 37. doi 10.2967/jnmt.111.089904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khorshidi, A., Ashoor, M., Hosseini, S.H., and Rajaee, A., Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 2012, vol. 109, p. 59. doi 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khorshidi, A. and Ashoor, M., Ann. Nucl. Med., 2014, vol. 28, p. 363. doi 10.1007/s12149-014-0820-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khorshidi, A., Sadeghi, M., Pazirandeh, A., Tenreiro, C., and Kadi, Y., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2014, vol. 299, p. 303. doi 10.1007/s10967-013-2749-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khorshidi, A., Cancer Biother. Radiopharm., 2015, vol. 30, p. 317. doi 10.1089/cbr.2014.1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khorshidi, A., J. Cancer Res. Ther., 2017, vol. 13, p. 456. doi 10.4103/0973-1482.179180Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubbia, C., Resonance Enhanced Neutron Captures for Element Activation and Waste Transmutation, CERNLHC/97-0040EET, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khorshidi, A., Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 2016, vol. 68, p. 449. doi 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abbas, K., Buono, S., Burgio, N., Cotogno, G., Gibson, N., Maciocco, L., Mercurio, G., Santagata, A., Simonelli, F., and Tagziria, H., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2009, vol. 601, p. 223. doi 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.152ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Froment, P., Tilquin, I., Cogneau, M., Delbar, Th., Vervier, J., and Ryckewaert, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2002, vol. 493, p. 165. doi 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01173-7ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.6.0, Pelowitz, D.B., Ed., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report no. LACP-07-1473, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Materials Science International Team (MSIT), Selected Nuclear Materials and Engineering Systems, 1st ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ENDF/B-VII.1, U.S. Evaluated Nuclear Data Library, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lamarsh, J.R. and Baratta, A.J., Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tilquin, I., Froment, P., Cogneau, M., Delbar, Th., Vervier, J., and Ryckewaert, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2005, vol. 545, p. 339. doi 10.1016/j.nima.2005.01.325ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Paramedical SciencesGerash University of Medical SciencesGerashIran

Personalised recommendations