Mercury in Hydrobionts and Their Habitat in Grønfjorden, West Spitsbergen, in Early Springtime
The first data were obtained on the total mercury content in hydrobionts and their habitat in Grønfjorden, Spitsbergen, at the waste discharge sites of the settlement of Barentsburg in early spring 2017. The Hg concentration was below the detection limit in the water and varied from 7.1 to 42.3 ng/g of dry weight in the bottom sediments. Mercury concentration in the hydrobionts increased toward the inner fjord and was higher near the mouth of the Grøndalen River, which flows into the fjord. Elevated Hg concentrations at the mouth of the Grøndalen River indicate that much of the toxic metal is brought to the inner part of the fjord with riverine runoff, and this Hg source is likely more important than the surface supply of Hg transferred from local surface pollution centers at Barentsburg. The Hg concentration depended on the position of the marine organisms in the trophic chain and was the highest in the detritophage mollusks Thyasira gouldi, Cardium sp., and Macoma calcarea, the specialized predatory sea snail Cryptonatica affinis, and the cod Gadus morhua, which is a benthosophage–secondary predator. The total Hg concentrations in the hydrobionts and their habitat in Grønfjorden were generally relatively low and close to the background one.
Keywordshydrobionts Hg pollution Grønfjorden Spitsbergen Arctic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- AMAP Assessment 2011: Mercury in the Arctic. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP, Oslo, 2011).Google Scholar
- AMAP/UNEP, 2013: Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (Oslo, Norway/UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, 2013).Google Scholar
- B. N. Demin, A. P. Graevskii, A. S. Demeshkin, S. V. Vlasov, S. S. Krylov, and N. A. Laletin, State and Tendencies in Changes of Environmental Pollution in the Anthropogenic Activity Area of the Russian Enterprises in the Spitsbergen Archipelago (Settlement Barentsburg and Adjacent Territories) During 2002—2010 (AANII, St.Petersburg, 2011) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- I. G. Hallanger, A. Ruus, D. Herzke, N. A. Warner, A. Evenset, E. S. Heimstad, G. W. Gabrielsen, and K. Borgå, “Influence of season, location, and feeding strategy on bioaccumulation of halogenated organic contaminants in Arctic marine zooplankton. Environ,” Toxic. Chem. 30, 77–87 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M. V. Ivanov, “Mercury in the bottom sediments of the Chukchi Sea and Ajacent Arctic Areas,” Geol. Geoekol. Kontnent. Okrain Evrazii, No. 4, 81–87 (2012).Google Scholar
- Mercury: Environmental Aspects. Environmental Health Criteria 86 (WHO, Geneva, 1989).Google Scholar
- N. I. Meshcheryakova and G. A. Tarasov, “Sedimentation and lithological structure of the subsurface sedimentary sequence in the near-mouth shoal of the Grendalen River (Gren-Fjord Bay),” Vestn. Murmansk. Gos. Tekhn. Univ. 19 (1), 101–109 (2016).Google Scholar
- Methylmercury. Environmental Gealth Criteria 101. (WHO, Geneva, 1990).Google Scholar
- S. Rognerud, J. O. Grimalt, and B. O. Rosseland, “Mercury and organochlorine contamination in brown trout (Salmo trutta) and arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from high mountain lakes in Europe and the Svalbard archipelago,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollut.: Focus 2, 209–232 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar