Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 79, Issue 12, pp 2186–2202 | Cite as

Synthesis of a Control System for a Steam Turbine

  • A. V. UtkinEmail author
Control in Technical Systems


Within the framework of the block approach, we propose a solution for a set of tasks for controlling a steam generator, i.e., a turbine unit under parametric uncertainty of the control object model, under the action of external uncontrolled disturbances and under incomplete measurements of the state vector. The feasibility of developed control algorithms has been confirmed by a simulation study in the Matlab–Simulink environment.


block approach decompositional synthesis tracking problem external uncoordinated disturbances synthesis of state observers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mello, F.P., Boiler Models for System Performance Studies, IEEE Transact. Power Syst., 1991, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mello, F.P., Dynamic Models for Fossil Fueled Steam Units in Power System Studies, IEEE Transact. Power Syst., 1991, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 753–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Venikov, V.A., Perekhodnye elektromekhanicheskie protsessy v elektricheskikh sistemakh (Electromechanical Transition Processes in Electric Systems), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merkur’ev, G.V. and Shargin, Yu.M., Ustoichivost’ energosistem (Stability of Power Systems), St. Petersburg: NOU “Tsentr Podgotovki Kadrov Energetiki,” 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Åström, K.J. and Bell, R.D., Drum Boiler Dynamics, Automatica, 2000, no. 36, pp. 363–378.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Labibi, B., Marquez, H.J., and Chen, T., Decentralized Robust PI Controller Design for an Industrial Utility Boiler, J. Proc. Control, 2009, vol. 19, pp. 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolek, W., Sasiadek, J., and Wisniewski, T., Linearization of Non-Linear MIMO Model of Large Power Plant Station, Proc. Am. Control Conf., 2000, pp. 4435–4436.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolek, W., Sasiadek, J., and Wisniewski, T., Adaptive Backstepping Control of a Power Plant Station Model, IFAC 15 Triennial World Congr., 2002, pp. 1650–1655.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng, K., Bentsman, J., and Taft, C.W., Full Operating Range Robust Hybrid Control of a Coal-Fired Boiler/Turbine Unit, J. Dynam. Syst. Measurement Control, 2008, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 0410111–04101114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ponce, I.U., Bentsman, J., Orlov, Yu., and Aguilar, L.Y., Generic Nonsmooth H∞ Output Synthesis: Application to a Coal-Fired Boiler/Turbine Unit With Actuator Dead Zone, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Techn., 2015, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Utkin, V.A., Separation of Motions in Observation Problems, Autom. Remote Control, 1990, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 300–308.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Utkin, V.A., Invariance and Independence in Systems with Separable Motion, Autom. Remote Control, 2001, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1825–1843.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Utkin, A.V., Method of State Expansion in the Design of Autonomous Control, Autom. Remote Control, 2007, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1006–1022.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akhobadze, A.G. and Krasnova, S.A., Tracking in Linear MIMO Systems under External Perturbations, Autom. Remote Control, 2009, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 933–957.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akhobadze, A.G. and Krasnova, S.A., Solving the Tracking Problem under Uncertainty Based on a Joint Block-Canonical Form of Controllability and Observability, Upravlen. Bol’shimi Sist., 2009, no. 24, pp. 34–80.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krasnova, S.A., Sirotina, T.G., and Utkin, V.A., A Structural Approach to Robust Control, Autom. Remote Control, 2011, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 1639–1666.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Utkin, V.A. and Utkin, A.V., Problem of Tracking in Linear Systems with Parametric Uncertainties under Unstable Zero Dynamics, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1577–1592.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loukianov, A.G., Dominguez, J.R., and Sastillo-Toledo, B., Robust Sliding Mode Regulation of Nonlinear Systems, Automatica, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 241–246.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krasnova, S.A. and Mysik, N.S., Cascade Synthesis of a State Observer with Nonlinear Correction Influences, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 263–280.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krasnova, S.A., Utkin, V.A., and Utkin, A.V., Block Approach to Analysis and Design of the Invariant Nonlinear Tracking Systems, Autom. Remote Control, 2017, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 2120–2140.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loukianov, A.G., Caballero-Barragan, H., Osuna-lbarra, I., et al., Robust Control for Uncertain Linear Delay Systems via Sliding Mode Control, Int. J. Robust Nonlin. Control, 2017, vol. 89, no. 17, pp. 4825–4845.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krasnov, D.V. and Utkin, A.V., Synthesis of a Multifunctional Tracking System under Uncertainty, Upravlen. Bol’shimi Sist., 2017, no. 69, pp. 29–49.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations