Abstract
This paper considers an extension of the actional model of influence in online social networks. Within the framework of this model, the influence and influence levels of separate agents (users) and meta-agents (subsets of users) are calculated on the basis of their actions taking into account the goals of a control subject (a Principal). We study some properties of the influence function. An example illustrates how the actional model can be used to calculate the influence levels of users in a concrete social network under available initial data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gubanov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., A Conceptual Approach to Online Social Networks Analysis, Autom. Remote Control, 2015, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1455–1462.
Aggarwal, C.C., Social Network Data Analytics, New York: Kluwer, 2011.
Everton, S.F., Disrupting Dark Networks (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences), Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.
Hubbell, C., An Input-Output Approach to Clique Identification, Sociometry, 1965, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 377–399.
Freeman, L.C., A Set of Measure of Centrality Based on Betweenness, Sociometry, 1977, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–41.
Gubanov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Friendship and Commenting Relations of Facebook Users, Upravlen. Bol’sh. Sist., 2014, vol. 52, pp. 69–84.
Agarwal, N., Liu, H., Tang, L., and Yu, P.S., Identifying the Influential Bloggers in Community, Proc. 1st ACM Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’08), Palo Alto, 2008, pp. 207–217.
Weng, J., Lim, E.-P., Jiang, J., and He, Q., Twitterrank: Finding Topic-sensitive Influential Twitterers, Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Web Search and Web Data Mining, New York, 2010, pp. 261–270.
Akritidis, L., Katsaros, D., and Bozanis, P., Identifying Influential Bloggers: Time Does Matter, Proc. 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Milan, 2009, pp. 76–83.
Gubanov, D.A., Novikov, D.A., and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Models of Influence in Social Networks, Upravlen. Bol’sh. Sist., 2009, vol. 27, pp. 205–281.
Friedkin, N.E. and Johnsen, E.C., Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Group Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011.
Gubanov, D.A., Novikov, D.A., and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Sotsial’nye seti: modeli informatsionnogo vliyaniya, upravleniya i protivoborstva (Social Networks: Models of Informational Influence, Control and Confrontation), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2010.
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., and Tardos, E., Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network, Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, 2003, pp. 137–146.
Granovetter, M., Threshold Models of Collective Behavior, Am. J. Sociol., 1978, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1420–1443.
Golub, B. and Jackson, M.O., Naive Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence, and the Wisdom of Crowds, Am. Econom. J.: Microeconomics, 2010, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 112–149.
Gubanov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., An Actional Model of Influential Users in Social Networks, Autom. Remote Control, 2015, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 1282–1290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © D.A. Gubanov, A.G. Chkhartishvili, 2016, published in Problemy Upravleniya, 2016, No. 6, pp. 12–17.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gubanov, D.A., Chkhartishvili, A.G. Influence Levels of Users and Meta-Users of a Social Network. Autom Remote Control 79, 545–553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117918030128
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117918030128