Advertisement

Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 372–384 | Cite as

Energy-based approach for flight control systems design

  • A. M. Shevchenko
Topical Issue

Abstract

We consider the fundamentals of the energy-based approach to spatial motion control. The resulting energy balance equation establishes quantitative relations between all energy sources and consumers in the system of objects “flying vehicle—thrust system—external environment.” We establish the structure and further modification of an energy-based flight control system. The energy balance equation lets us estimate the level of atmospheric disturbances and formulate the commanding control index for engine thrust under winds of complex structure. For ground-based stages, we show a prediction method for the takeoff energy possibilities with air traffic obstacles; for situations of interrupted takeoff, the possibilities to stop inside the runway.

Keywords

Remote Control Decision Making Point Energy Balance Equation Full Energy Thrust System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurdjukov, A.P., Nachinkina, G.N., and Shevtchenko, A.M., Energy Approach to Flight Control, AIAA Conf. Navigation, Guidance & Control, Boston, 1998, AAIA Paper 98-4211.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borisov, V.G., Nachinkina, G.N., and Shevchenko, A.M., An Energy-Based Approach to Flight Control, Autom. Remote Control, 1999, vol. 60, no. 6, part 1, pp. 805–813.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambregts, A.A., Vertical Flight Path and Speed Control Autopilot Design Using Total Energy Principles, AIAA, 1983, Paper 83-2239CP, pp. 559–569.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents. 1959–2011, Boeing, July 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kofman, V.D., Poltavets, V.A., and Teimurazov, R.A., A Comparative Analysis of Flight Security for Russian and Foreign Aircraft, Probl. Bezopasn. Poletov, 2006, no. 1, pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glubokaya, M.G., Modern State of the Takeoff Security Problem, Iskusstv. Intellekt, 2005, no. 3, pp. 370–380.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erusalimskii, M.A., Analyzing the Decision Making on Stopping or Proceeding with Takeoff in Aviation Accidents and Incidents, Aviation EXplorer, 07.11.2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nikiforov, S.P., An Onboard Ground Roll Control System as an Efficient Way to Improve Takeoff Security of Transport Aircraft, Tekh. Vozdushn. Flota, 2002, nos. 3–4, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zavershinskii, V.V., Ustroistvo dlya predotvrashcheniya vykatyvaniya vozdushnykh sudov za predely vzletno-posadochnoi polosy (A Device for Preventing Runway Overrun of Flying Vehicles), RF Patent RU2373115, published on 20.11.2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharov, V.D., A Method for Estimating the Runway Overrun Probability of Landing Aircraft, Nauch. Vestn. MGTU Grazhdan. Aviats., 2007, no. 122(12).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pinder, S.D., Aircraft Takeoff Performance Monitoring in Far-Northern Regions: An Application of the Global Positioning System, PhD Dissertation, Saskatchewan: Univ. of Saskatchewan, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Middleton, D.B., Srivatsan, R., and Person, L.H., Jr., Flight Test of Takeoff Performance Monitoring System Indicates Successful Use in Research Vehicle, Flight Safety Digest, 1994, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shevchenko, A.M., Pavlov, B.V., and Nachinkina, G.N., A Prediction Method for Aircraft Takeoff with Air Traffic Obstacles, Izv. Yuzhnogo Federal. Univ., Tekh. Nauki, 2012, no. 3, pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borisov, V.G., Pavlov, B.V., and Shevchenko, A.M., Materialy VII nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii “Mekhatronika, avtomatizatsiya, upravlenie” (Proc. VIIth Sci.-Tech. Conf. “Mechatronics, Automation, Control”), St. Petersburg: OAO Kontsern “TsNII Elektropribor,” 2010, pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shevchenko, A.M., Some Means for Informational Support of Airliner Pilot, V Int. Sci. Conf. Physics and Control (Physcon 2011), Leon, Spain, Sept. 5–8, 2011, pp. 1–5, http://lib.physcon.ru/doc?id=78f90e41e746/.
  16. 16.
    Bach, R.E. and Wingrove, R.C., The Analysis of Airline Flight Records for Winds and Application to the Delta 191 Accident, AIAA, 1986, Paper 86-2227.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, Y. and Bryson, A., Simple Analyses of Paths through Windshears and Downdrafts, AIAA, 1990, Paper 90-222.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Psiaki, M.L. and Stengel, R.F., Optimal Aircraft Performance During Microburst Encounter, J. Guidance, Control Dynam., 1991, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 440–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Shevchenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations