Abstract—Chemical composition of the Upper Pleistocene sediments (turbidites interbedded with hemipelagic sediments) from contact zones with basalt sills in the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of the California (DSDP Hole 481A), was studied by the methods of XRF and ICP-MS. Alteration for most macroelements in these sediments is not or slightly. This is not indicates immobility or slightly mobility of these elements, as a process of a distribution of elements occurs inside of sediments without a change their bulk chemical compositions at dissolution/deposition process, in which primary diatoms, opal CT, quartz, and clay minerals. In results, as a whole there is no change in the content of macroelements in sediments. Whereas, the contents Corg, Li, Cu, As, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, Ta, W, Tl, Pb, Bi strongly decreasing in altered sediments from contact zones with sills.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
E. V. Blinova and V. B. Kurnosov, “Hydrothermal alterations of sediments in the southern trough of the Guaymas Basin (Gulf of California) and transformation of the composition of solutions,” Lithol. Miner. Resour. 50, 433–451.
V. B. Kurnosov and E. V. Blinova, “Hydrothermal alteration of sediments and compositional evolution of solutions in the Guaymas basin of the Gulf of California,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 461, 217–220 (2015).
V. B. Kurnosov, B. A. Sakharov, and E. V. Blinova, “Clay minerals in sediments of the hydrothermally active southern trough in the Guaymas Basin (Gulf of California),” Lithol. Miner. Resour. 51, 243–261 (2016).
V. B. Kurnosov, B. A. Sakharov, A. R. Geptner, et al., “Clay minerals in sediments from contact zones with basalt sills,” Lithol. Miner. Resour. 54, 221–235 (2019).
V. B. Kurnosov, B. A. Sakharov, A. R. Geptner, et al., “Clay minerals in sediments from the central part of the Guaymas Basin, the Gulf of California, hole 478,” Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 13, 479–491 (2019).
J. R. Curray and D. G. Moore, “Objectives of drilling on young passive continental margins: application to the Gulf of California,” Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj. 64 (1), 27–33 (1982).
J. M. Gieskes, H. Elderfield, J. R. Lawrence, et al., “Geochemistry of interstitial waters and sediments, Leg 64, Gulf of California,” Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj. 64 (2), 675–694 (1982).
M. Kastner, “Evidence for two distinct hydrothermal systems in the Guaymas Basin,” Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj. 64 (2), 1143–1158 (1982).
R. L. Larson, “Bathymetry, magnetic anomalies, and plate tectonic history of the mouth of the Gulf of California,” Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 83, 3345–3360 (1972).
L. A. Lawver and D. L. Williams, “Heat flow in the central Gulf of California,” J. Geophys. 84, 3465–3478 (1979).
B. T. R. Lewis, P. Robinson, et al., “Crustal accretion in the Gulf of California, an intermediate-rate spreading axis,” Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj. 65, 739–752 (1983).
P. Lonsdale, J. L. Bischoff, V. M. Burns, et al., “A high-temperature hydrothermal deposit on the seabed at a Gulf of California spreading center,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 49, 8–20 (1980).
D. G. Moore, “Plate-edge deformation and crustal growth, Gulf of California structural province,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84, 1883–1906 (1973).
J. Niemitz, “Geochemistry of sediments, Leg 64, Gulf of California,” Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj. 64 (2), 695–716 (1982).
D. L. Williams, K. Becker, L. A. Lawver, and R. P. Von Herzen, “Heat flow at the spreading centers of the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California,” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 84, 6757–6796 (1979).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Sediment samples were taken at the core storage of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) at Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Funding
The study was carried out as part of the state research plan, no. 0135-2019-0053.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goncharov, E.O., Kurnosov, V.B., Konovalov, Y.I. et al. Hydrothermal Altered Sediments from Contact Zones with Sills in the North Trough of the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California. Oceanology 60, 98–107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437020010129
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437020010129