Advertisement

Arid Ecosystems

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 254–259 | Cite as

Specific Features of Chestnut Soils in the Southern Basins of Siberia

  • G. D. ChimitdorzhievaEmail author
  • E. V. TsybikovaEmail author
APPLIED PROBLEMS OF ARID LAND DEVELOPMENT
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

A long period of freezing and drying of the soil profile and frequent seasonal and daily temperature fluctuations lead to the formation of chestnut soils featuring slightly condensed and developed aliphatic humic acid (HA) chains, which makes the soils unstable. The current environmental condition of chestnut soils confirms this; the area of degraded arable and grazing lands in the Republic of Buryatia is significant. Their location in intermountain basins often results in a high vulnerability to deflation processes, leading to dehumification. This adverse phenomenon is currently amplified by global climate change, which intensifies the aridization rates. The noted complex of factors determines the specific composition of regional phytocoenoses, which are highly ligninoficated and depleted of protein components; this affects the structure of humic substances and determines the number of specific features of the local humus, which is distinct from that in similar soils of other regions.

Keywords:

chestnut soils humic acids humus Siberia 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was performed in the framework of a topic of the research studies of the Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, state registration no. AAAA-A17-117011810038-7.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Сonflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Agrokhimicheskie metody issledovaniya pochv (Agrochemical Analysis of Soils), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biryukova, O.N. and Orlov, D.S., Content and composition of humus in the main soil types of Russia, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2004, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 143–158.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., and Nadporozhskaya, M.A., Analysis of the dynamics of plant residue mineralization and humification in soil, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2007, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chimitdorzhieva, G.D., Gumus kholodnykh pochv (ekologicheskie aspekty) (Humus of Cold Soils: Ecological Aspects), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gamzikov, G.P., Agrochemical properties of Siberian soils and its regulation, Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Sibirskie agrokhimicheskie Pryanishnikovskie chteniya,” Irkutsk, 16–21 iyulya 2007 g. (Proc. IV Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Siberian Agrochemical Pryanishnikov’s Readings,” Irkutsk, July 16–21, 2007), Novosibirsk, 2009, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Il’in, V.B., Elementarnyi khimicheskii sostav rastenii (Elementary Chemical Composition of the Plants), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klenov, B.M., Ustoichivost’ gumusa avtomorfnykh pochv Zapadnoi Sibiri (Resistance of Humus in Automorphic Soils of Western Siberia), Novosibirsk: Geo, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kogut, B.M., Assessment of the humus content in arable soils of Russia, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2012, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 944–952.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kononova, M.M., Organicheskoe veshchestvo pochvy (Soil Organic Matter), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kovalev, I.V. and Kovaleva, N.O., Biochemistry of lignin in soils of periodic excessive moistening (from the example of agrogray soils in opolie landscapes of the Russian Plain), Eurasian Soil Sci., 2008, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1066–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kovaleva, N.O. and Kovalev, I.V., Transformation of lignin in surface and buried soils of mountainous landscapes, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2009, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1270–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulikov, A.I., Dugarov, V.I., and Korsunov, V.M., Merzlotnye pochvy: ekologiya, teploenergetika i prognoz produktivnosti (Permafrost Soils: Ecology, Thermal Energetics, and Productivity Forecast), Ulan-Ude: Buryat. Nauch. Tsentr, Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kulikov, A.I., Ubugunov, L.L., and Mangataev, A.Ts., Global climate change and its impact on ecosystems, Arid Ecosyst., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lima, D.L.D., Duarte, A.C., and Esteves, V.I., Solid-phase extraction and capillary electrophoresis determination of phenols from soil after alkaline CuO oxidation, Chemosphere, 2007, no. 69, pp. 561–568.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merkusheva, M.G., Bioproduktivnost’ pochv senokosov i pastbishch sukhostepnoi zony Zabaikal’ya (Biological Productivity of Soils under Haymaking and Pastures in Dry Steppe Zone of Transbaikalia), Ulan-Ude: Buryat. Nauch. Tsentr, Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Merkusheva, M.G., The humus state and structure of microbial cenosis in deflated chestnut soils of Barguzin depression (Western Transbaikal), Arid Ecosyst., 2012, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nimaeva, S.Sh., Mikrobiologiya krioaridnykh pochv (na primere Zabaikal’ya) (Microbiology of Cryoarid Soils in Transbaikalia), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orlov, D.S., Gumusovye kisloty pochv i obshchaya teoriya gumifikatsii (Humic Soils and General Theory of Humification), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ponomareva, V.V., Teoriya pochvoobrazovatel’nogo protsessa (The Theory of Pedogenesis), Moscow: Nauka, 1964.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ponomareva, V.V. and Plotnikova, T.A., Gumus i pochvoobrazovanie (metody i rezul’taty izucheniya) (Humus and Pedogenesis: Methods and Study Results), Leningrad: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thevenot, M., Dignac, M.-F., and Rumpel, C., Fate of lignins in soils: a review, Soil Biol. Biochem., 2010, vol. 42, pp. 1200–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tishchenko, V.V. and Rydalevskaya, M.D., Chemical analysis of humic acids of different types of soils, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1936, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 137–140.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vazhenin, I.G. and Vazhenina, E.A., Transbaikalia region: Buryatia and Chita oblast, in Agrokhimicheskaya kharakteristika pochv SSSR (Vostochnaya Sibir’) (Agrochemical Characteristics of Soils of USSR: Eastern Siberia), Moscow: Nauka, 1969, pp. 5–209.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Volkovintser, V.I., Stepnye krioaridnye pochvy (Steppe Cryoarid Soils), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zavarzina, A.G. and Demin, V.V., Acid-base properties of humic acids of different origin as seen from the potentiometric titration data, Eurasian Soil Sci., 1999, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1115–1122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesUlan-UdeRussia
  2. 2.Buryat Republican Institute of Educational PolicyUlan-UdeRussia

Personalised recommendations