Advertisement

Advances in Gerontology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 352–354 | Cite as

Analysis of Indicators of Primary and Repeated Disability due to Eye Diseases in People of Retirement Age in the Russian Federation and in Moscow

  • M. G. NazarianEmail author
  • O. Yu. Vertash
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This paper analyzes the dynamics of primary and secondary disability due to eye diseases in people of retirement age in the Russian Federation and Moscow for the period 2007–2016. The main medical and social indicators in disabled people of retirement age are defined. A comparative analysis of primary and repeated disability in the Russian Federation and Moscow is performed.

Keywords:

primary disability repeated disability eye diseases structure of disability level of disability 

Notes

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Baranova, V.P., The structure of primary disability due to the pathology of the vision organ and its dynamics, in Aktual’nye voprosy oftal’mologii (Relevant Problems in Ophthalmology), Tr. Mosk. Oftal’mol. Klin. Bol’n., Moscow, 2006, part 1, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grishina, L.P., Current trends in disability and its prevention in the Russian Federation, Yubileinaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya posvyashchennoi 75-letiyu Tsentral’nogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta ekspertizy trudosposobnosti i organizatsii truda invalidov, Tezisy dokladov (Jubilee Sci.-Pract. Conf. Dedicated to the 75th Anniversary of the Central Scientific-Research Institute of Rehabilitation and Habilitation of the Disabled, Abstracts of Papers), Moscow, 2005, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Libman, E.S. and Shakhova, E.V., Blindness and visual disability in the Russian population, VIII S”ezda oftal’mologov Rossii, Tezisy dokladov (The VIII Congr. of Russian Ophthalmologists, Abstracts of Papers), Moscow, 2005, pp. 78–79.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Momot, V.A. and Ryzhkov, V.M., The distribution and structure of disability in the All-Russian Society of the blind people in 1995–2004, Med.-Sots. Eksp. Reabil., 2006, no. 1, pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bourne, R.R., Taylor, H.R., Flaxman, S.R., et al., Number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma worldwide and in world regions 1990–2010: a meta-analysis, PLoS One, 2016, vol. 20, no. 11, p. e0162229.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medeiros, F.A., Gracitelli, C.P., Boer, E.R., et al., Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma patients, Ophthalmology, 2015, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan, J.C., Garway-Heath, D.F., Fitzke, F.W., and Hitchings, R.A., Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 2003, vol. 44, pp. 1126–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tautman, D.R. and Klein, B.E., The Beaver Dam eye study, Ophthalmology, 1996, vol. 8, no. 103, pp. 1169–1178.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thylefors, B., Avoidable blindness, Bull. W.H.O., 1999, vol. 6, no. 77, p. 453.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Bureau of Medical and Social ExpertiseMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations