Inorganic Materials: Applied Research

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 785–793 | Cite as

Prospects of Application of Self-Healing Materials and Technologies Based on Them

  • N. N. SitnikovEmail author
  • I. A. Khabibullina
  • V. I. Mashchenko
  • R. N. Rizakhanov
Physicochemical Principles of Creating Materials and Technologies


Self-healing materials are of increasing interest for science and industry. However, such materials and technologies based on them are not widely implemented at the large-scale industrial level. There are reports on single successful implementations of such technologies; the concept of artificial self-healing of nonbiological materials is mostly actualized in prototypes for self-healing materials and systems. Self-restoring of the initial characteristics of materials is the most successfully realized in polymers and compositions based on them, and polymer coatings are the most applicable and commercially demanded self-healing materials. In this article, the basic mechanisms of self-healing of the initial characteristics in materials of different types are briefly presented and the technologies based on them are considered. The data on self-healing materials of different chemical nature (polymers, cements, ceramics, metals, and composite materials) are analyzed. The physical and chemical principles of providing the effect of self-restoring of the initial characteristics are highlighted, and the prospects of practical implementation of self-healing materials and technologies on their basis are discussed. The sources of information used were overviews on self-healing materials of different types, patents, and scientific articles.


self-restoring self-healing polymers ceramics cements concretes metals composite materials encapsulated systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wool, R.P., Self-healing materials: a review, Soft Matter, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 400–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekas, D.G., Tsirka, K., Baltzis, D., and Paipetis, A.S., Self-healing materials: a review of advances in materials, evaluation, characterization and monitoring techniques, Composites, Part B, 2016, vol. 87, pp. 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kessler, M.R., Self-healing: a new paradigm in materials design, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 2007, vol. 221, pp. 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ying, Y., Xiaochu, D., and Marek, W., Urban chemical and physical aspects of self-healing materials, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2015, vol. 49–50, pp. 34–59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scheiner, M., Dickens, T.J., and Okoli, O., Progress towards self-healing polymers for composite structural applications, Polymer, 2016, vol. 83, pp. 260–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, V.C. and Yang, E., Self-healing in concrete materials, in Self-Healing Materials, van der Zwaag, S., Ed., Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 161–193.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Rooij, M., van Tittelboom, K., De Belie, N., and Schlangen, E., Self-Healing Phenomena in Cement-Based Materials, Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, M., Johannesson, B., and Geiker, M., A review: self-healing in cementitious materials and engineered cementitious composite as a self-healing material, Constr. Build. Mater., 2012, vol. 28, pp. 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan, Y.C., Yin, T., Rong, M.Z., and Zhang, M.Q., Self-healing in polymers and polymer composites. Concepts, realization and outlook: A review, eXPRESS Polym. Lett., 2008, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 238–250.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urdl, K., Kandelbauer, A., Kern, W., and Müller, U., Self-healing of densely cross-linked thermoset polymers— a critical review, Prog. Org. Coat., 2017, vol. 104, pp. 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu, D.Y., Rong, M.Z., and Zhang, M.Q., Self-healing polymeric materials based on microencapsulated healing agents: From design to preparation, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2015, vols. 49–50, pp. 175–220.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ying, Y. and Marek, W., Urban self-healing polymeric materials, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, vol. 42, no. 17, pp. 7446–7467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thakur, V.K. and Michael, R.K., Self-healing polymer nanocomposite materials: a review, Polymer, 2015, vol. 69, pp. 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, H.I., Vahedi, V., and Pasbakhsh, P., Self-healing polymer composites: prospects, challenges, and applications, Polym. Rev., 2016, vol. 56, pp. 225–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zwaag, S., Grande, A.M., and Post, W., Review of current strategies to induce self-healing behavior in fibrereinforced polymer based composites, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, vol. 30, pp. 1633–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blaiszik, B.J., Kramer, S.L.B., Olugebefola, S.C., et al., Self-healing polymers and composites, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2010, vol. 40, pp. 1790–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhua, D.Y., Rong, M.Z., and Zhang, M.Q., Self-healing polymeric materials based on microencapsulatedhealing agents: from design to preparation, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2015, vols. 49–50, pp. 175–220.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Akarachkin, S.A., Self-recovering materials, Proc. XVIII Int. Conf. Reshetnev Readings, November 11–14, 2014, Loginov, Yu.Yu., Ed., Krasnoyarsk: Sib. Gos. Aerokosm. Univ., 2014, part 1, pp. 339–340.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kotov, A.N., Novye naukoemkie tekhnologii v tekhnike. Entsiklopediya. Tom 30. Nanotekhnologii—novyi uroven’ resheniya problem pri sozdanii perspektivnykh izdelii RKT (New High Technologies in Engineering: Encyclopedia, Vol. 30: Nanotechnologies: A New Level of Problem Solving in the Development of Advanced Products for Rocket-Space Technics), Moscow: Ensitekh, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu, D.Y., Meure, S., and Solomon, D., Self-healing polymeric materials: a review of recent developments, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2008, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 479–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jud, K., Kausch, H.H., and Williams, J.G., Fracture mechanics studies of crack healing and welding of polymers, J. Mater. Sci., 1981, vol. 16, pp. 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, Y.H. and Wool, R.P., A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface, Macromolecules, 1983, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1115–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toohey, K.S., Sottos, N.R., Lewis, J.A., et al., Selfhealing materials with microvascular networks, Nat. Mater., 2007, vol. 6, pp. 581–585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams, H.R., Trask, R.S., Knights, A.C., et al., Biomimetic reliability strategies for self-healing vascular networks in engineering materials, J. R. Soc., Interface, 2008, vol. 5, no. 24, pp. 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hansen, C.J., Wu, W., Toohey, K.S., et al., Self-healing materials with interpenetrating microvascular networks, Adv. Mater., 2009, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 4143–4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fetter, E., US Patent 1427277, 1921.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bateman, S., Meure, S., et al., US Patent 20120165432, 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blaiszik B.J., Moll J.L., et al., US Patent 8703285, 2014.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    White, S.R., Sottos, N.R., Geubelle, P.H., et al., US Patent 6 518 330, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    White, S.R., et al., US Patent 6 518 330, 2003.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Klein, D.J., US Patent 20100174 041, 2010.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanders, M.L., et al., US Patent 5790304, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parrish, C.F., US Patent 7285306, 2007.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mather, P. and Pan, W., US Patent 20150343749, 2015.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zaykoski, J.A. and Talmy, I.G., US Patent 6632762, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Merle, P., Guntzburger, Y., Haddad, E., et al., US Patent 0036568, 2009.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jolley, S.T., Williams, M.K., Gibson, T.L., et al., WO Patent 174325, 2012.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    The 2015 International Conference on Self-Healing Materials (ICSHM2015). http://icshm2015.pratt. Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hillewaere, X.K.D. and Du Prez, F.E., Fifteen chemistries for autonomous external self-healing polymers and composites, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2015, vols. 49–50, pp. 121–153.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wool, R.P. and O’Connor, K.M., A theory of crack healing in polymers, J. Appl. Phys., 1981, vol. 52, pp. 5953–5963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sonoda, Y., Solid-state [2+2] photodimerization and photopolymerization of α,ω-diarylpolyene monomers: Effective utilization of noncovalent intermolecular interactions in crystals, Molecules, 2011, vol. 16, pp. 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takeda, K., Tanahashi, M., and Unno, H., Self-repairing mechanism of plastics, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2003, vol. 4, pp. 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Plaisted, T.A. and Nemat-Nasser, S., Quantitative evaluation of fracture, healing and re-healing of a reversibly cross-linked polymer, Acta Mater., 2007, vol. 55, pp. 5684–5696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Keller, M.K., White, S.R., and Sottos, N.R., A selfhealing poly(dimethyl siloxane) elastomer, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, vol. 17, pp. 2399–2404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang, W., Duchet, J., and Gerard, J.F., Self-healable interfaces based on thermoreversible Dielse–Alder reactions in carbon fiber reinforced composites, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2014, vol. 430, pp. 61–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Amamoto, Y., Otsuka, H., Takahara, A., et al., Selfhealing of covalently cross-linked polymers by reshuffling thiuram disulfide moieties in air under visible light, Adv Mater., 2012, vol. 24, no. 29, pp. 3975–3980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Roy, N., Buhler, E., and Lehn, J.-M., Double dynamic self-healing polymers: Supramolecular and covalent dynamic polymers based on the bisiminocarbohydrazide motif, Polym. Int., 2014, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1400–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yoon, J.A., Kamada, J., Koynov, K., et al., Self-healing polymer films based on thioledisulfide exchange reactions and self-healing kinetics measured using atomic force microscopy, Macromolecules, 2011, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hentschel, J., Kushner, A.M., Ziller, J., et al., Selfhealing supramolecular block copolymers, Angew. Chem., 2012, vol. 124, no. 42, pp. 10713–10717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bond, I.P., Trask, R.S., and Williams, H.R., Self-healing fiber-reinforced polymer composites, MRS Bull., 2008, vol. 33, pp. 770–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sanada, K., Itaya, N., and Shindo, Y., Self-healing of interfacial debonding in fiber-reinforced polymers and effect of microstructure on strength recovery, Open Mech. Eng. J., 2008, vol. 2, pp. 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Koralagundi, M.A.K., Strong, S., El Gammal, T., et al., Development of novel self-healing polymer composites for use in wind turbine blades, J. Energy Resour. Technol., 2015, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 51–202.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Williams, G., Trask, R.S., and Bond, I.P., A self-healing carbon fibre reinforced polymer for aerospace applications, Composites, Part A, 2007, vol. 38, pp. 1525–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Song, G., Ma, N., and Li, H.N., Application of shape memory alloys in civil structures, Eng. Struct., 2006, vol. 28, pp. 1266–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shelyakov, A.V., Sitnikov, N.N., Menushenkov, A.P., Rizakhanov, R.N., et al., Forming the two-way shape memory effect in TiNiCu alloy via melt spinning, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 2015, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1134–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kirkby, E.L., Rule, J.D., Michaud, V.J., et al., Embedded shape-memory alloy wires for improved performance of self-healing polymers, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2253–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sundeev, R.V., Glezer, A.M., and Shalimova, A.V., Structural and phase transitions in the amorphous and nanocrystalline Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloys upon high-pressure torsion, Mater. Lett., 2014, vol. 133, pp. 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ratna, D. and Karger-Kocsis, J., Recent advances in shape memory polymers and composites: a review, J. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 43, pp. 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xu, W. and Li, G., Constitutive modeling of shape memory polymer based self-healing syntactic foam, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2010, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1306–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gardner, G.L., Manufacturing encapsulated products, Chem. Eng. Progr., 1966, vol. 62, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zako, M. and Takano, N., Intelligent material systems using epoxy particles to repair microcracks and delamination damage in GFRP, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 1999, vol. 10, pp. 836–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yin, T., Rong, M.Z., Zhang, M.Q., et al., Self-healing epoxy composites—preparation and effect of the healant consisting of microencapsulated epoxy and latent curing agent, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2007, vol. 67, pp. 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yin, T., Zhou, L., Rong, M.Z., et al., Self-healing woven glass fabric/epoxy composites with the healant consisting of micro-encapsulated epoxy and latent curing agent, Smart Mater. Struct., 2008, vol. 17, pp. 015019/1–015019/8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Haase, M.F., Grigoriev, D.O., Mohwald, H., et al., Development of nanoparticle stabilized polymer nanocontainers with high content of the encapsulated active agent and their application in water-borne anticorrosive coatings, Adv. Mater., 2012, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 2429–2435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Haiyan, L., Rongguo, W., and Wenbo, L., Preparation and self-healing performance of epoxy composites with microcapsules and tungsten (VI) chloride catalyst, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2012, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 924–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kirkby, E.L., et al., Performance of self-healing epoxy with microencapsulated healing agent and shape memory alloy wires, Polymer, 2009, vol. 50, no. 23, pp. 5533–5538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Jackson, A.C., Bartelt, J.A., and Braun, P.V., Transparent self-healing polymers based on encapsulated plasticizers in a thermoplastic matrix, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 4705–4711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kling, S. and Czigany, T., Damage detection and selfrepair in hollow glass fiber fabric-reinforced epoxy composites via fiber filling, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2014, vol. 99, pp. 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hamilton, A.R., Sottos, N.R., and White, S.R., Selfhealing of internal damage in synthetic vascular materials, Adv. Mater., 2010, vol. 22, no. 45, pp. 5159–5163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Esser-Kahn, A.P., Thakre, P.R., Dong, H., et al., Three-dimensional microvascular fiber-reinforced composites, Adv. Mater., 2011, vol. 23, no. 32, pp. 3654–3658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Peterson, A.M., Kotthapalli, H., Rahmathullah, M.A.M., et al., Investigation of interpenetrating polymer networks for self-healing applications, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Coppola, A.M., Thakre, P.R., Sottos, N.R., et al., Tensile properties and damage evolution in vascular 3D woven glass/epoxy composites, Composites, Part A, 2014, vol. 59, pp. 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mehta, P.K., Sulfate attack on concrete—a critical review, in Materials Science of Concrete, Skalny, J., Ed., Westerville, Oh: Am. Ceram. Soc., 1993, pp. 105–130.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tittelboom, K.V. and Belie, N.D., Self-healing in cementitious materials—a review, Materials, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 2182–2217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hearn, N. and Morley, C.T., Self-healing, autogenous healing and continued hydration: What is the difference, Mater. Struct., 1998, vol. 31, pp. 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yang, Y.Z., Lepech, M.D., Yang, E.H., et al., Autogenous healing of engineered cementitious composites under wet-dry cycles, Cem. Concr. Res., 2007, vol. 39, pp. 382–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tittelboom, K.V., Belie, N.D., Muynck, W.D., et al., Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 2010, vol. 40, pp. 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ahn, T.H. and Kishi, T., Crack self-healing behavior of cementitious composites incorporating various mineral admixtures, J. Adv. Concr. Technol., 2010, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Aldea, C., Song, W., Popovics, J.S., et al., Extent of healing of cracked normal strength concrete, J. Mater. Civil. Eng., 2000, vol. 12, pp. 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Jonkers, H.M., Thijssen, A., Muyzer, G., et al., Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete, Ecol. Eng., 2010, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yoshioka, S. and Nakao, W., Methodology for evaluating self-healing agent of structural ceramics, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2015, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1395–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ono, M., Nakao, W., Takahashi, K., et al., A new methodology to guarantee the structural integrity of Al2O3/SiC composite using crack healing and a proof test, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2007, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yang, H.J., Pei, Y.T., Rao, J.C., et al., Self-healing performance of Ti2AlC ceramic, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 8304–8313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Song, G.M., Pei, Y.T., Sloof, W.G., et al., Oxidationinduced crack healing in Ti3AlC2 ceramics, Scr. Mater., 2008, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Farle, A., Kwarkernaak, C., van der Zwaag, S., et al., A conceptual study into the potential of Mn+1AXn-phase ceramics for self-healing of crack damage, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2015, vol. 35, pp. 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nakao, W. and Abe, S., Enhancement of the self-healing ability in oxidation induced self-healing ceramic by modifying the healing agent, Smart Mater. Struct., 2012, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ando, K., Kim, B.-S., Chu, M.-C., et al., Crack-healing and mechanical behavior of Al2O3/Sic composites at elevated temperature, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2004, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zhang, S., et al., Self-healing of creep damage by gold precipitation in iron alloys, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2015, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shinya, N., Kyono, J., and Laha, K., Self-healing effect of boron nitride precipitation on creep cavitation in austenitic stainless steel, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2006, vol. 17, pp. 1127–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Laha, K., Kyono, J., and Shinya, N., An advanced creep cavitation resistance Cu-containing 18Cr–12Ni–Nb austenitic stainless steel, Scr. Mater., 2007, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    He, S.M., et al., Thermally activated precipitation at deformation-induced defects in Fe–Cu and Fe–Cu–B–N alloys studied by positron annihilation spectroscopy, Phys. Rev., 2010, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 94–103.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bondarenko, G.G., Radiation-stimulated processes in near-surface layers of metal alloys, Metally, 1993, no. 1, pp. 150–161.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhang, S., Kohibrecher, J., Tichelaar, F.D., et al., Defect-induced Au precipitation in Fe–Au and Fe–Au–B–N alloys studied by in situ small-angle neutron scattering, Acta Mater., 2013, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 7009–7019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Bondarenko, G.G. and Udris, Ya.Ya., Influence of high heat flux loading and irradiation on some promising candidate materials for the diverter structure, Fusion Eng. Des., 1998, vols. 39–40, pp. 419–426.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Williams, H.R., Trask, R.S., and Bond, I.P., Self-healing sandwich panels: restoration of compressive strength after impact, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2008, vols. 15–16, pp. 3171–3177.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zavada, S.R., McHardy, N.R., et al., Rapid, punctureinitiated healing via oxygen-mediated polymerization, ACS Macro Lett., 2015, vol. 4, pp. 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Williams, H.R., Trask, R.S., and Bond, I.P., Self-healing composite sandwich structures, Smart Mater. Struct., 2007, vol. 16, pp. 1198–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bailey, P.B.S., Hayes, S.A., and Lafferty, A.D., Novel interlayers for self-healing sandwich structures, Second Int. Conf. on Self-Healing Materials, Chicago, Illinois USA, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009, pp. 21–27.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Aissa, B., Tagziria, K., and Haddad, E., The self-healing capability of carbon fibre composite structures subjected to hypervelocity impacts simulating orbital space debris, ISRN Nanomater., 2012, vol. 2012, art. ID 351205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. N. Sitnikov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • I. A. Khabibullina
    • 1
  • V. I. Mashchenko
    • 3
  • R. N. Rizakhanov
    • 1
  1. 1.Keldysh Research CenterMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Research Nuclear UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Moscow Region State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations