Advertisement

Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 147–154 | Cite as

Seasonal and Long-Term Dynamics of Population Abundance of the Invasive Species Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) in the Vistula (Kaliningrad) Lagoon of the Baltic Sea

  • E. N. Naumenko
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Long-term monitoring studies of abundance dynamics of the invasive species Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) were conducted in the Vistula (Kaliningrad) Lagoon of the Baltic Sea. We analyzed the size and age structure of its population, individual fecundity, and distribution. We found that its population abundance abruptly fluctuated, which was caused by hydrological conditions. C. pengoi had larger individual body size and higher fecundity compared to those in its native water body or other recipient waters.

Keywords

Vistula Lagoon Cercopagis pengoi abundance dynamics structure fecundity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alimov, A.F., Bogutskaya, N.G., Orlova, M.I., Paevskii, V.A., and Reznik, S.Ya., Anthropogenic propagation of animal and plant species: process and result, in Biologicheskie invazii v vodnykh i nazemnykh ekosistemakh (Biological Invasions in Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems), Alimov, A.F. and Bogutskaya, N.G., Eds., Moscow: KMK, 2004, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
  2. Balushkina, E.V. and Vinberg, G.G., Relationships between the body length and weight in planktonic crustaceans, in Eksperimental’nye i polevye issledovaniya biologicheskikh osnov produktivnosti ozer (Experimental and Field Studies of the Biological Basis of Lake Productivity), Vinberg, G.G., Ed., Leningrad, 1979a, pp. 58–72.Google Scholar
  3. Balushkina, E.V. and Vinberg, G.G., Relationships between the body weight and length in planktonic animals, in Obshchie osnovy izucheniya vodnykh ekosistem (The General Basis for Study of Aquatic Ecosystems), Vinberg, G.G., Ed., Leningrad, 1979b, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar
  4. Chechko, V.A., Analysis of space and time variations in the suspended matter distribution in Kaliningrad Bay of the Baltic Sea, Water Resour., 2002, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 388–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chubarenko, B.V., Chubarenko, I.P., and Kuleshov, A.F., The results of 1994–1997 field investigations of hydrological structure and transparency of water in Russian part of Vistula Lagoon, Proc. Symp. “Freshwater Fish and the Herring Populations in the Coastal Lagoons: Environment and Fisheries,” Gdynia, May 6–7, 1998, Gdynia: Sea Fishery Inst., 1999, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
  6. Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Feneva, I.Yu., and Budaev, S.V., The role of predation and competition in invasive processes by the example of zooplankton communities, Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 2006, no. 1, pp. 67–73.Google Scholar
  7. Haney, J.F. and Hall, D.J., Sugar-coated Daphnia: a preservation technique for Cladocera, Limnol. Oceanongr., 1973, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holliland, P.B., Holmborn, T., and Gorokhova, E., Assessing diet of the non-indigenous predatory cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi using stable isotopes, J. Plankton Res., 2012, vol. 34, pp. 376–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kiselev, I.A., Plankton morei i kontinental’nykh vodoemov, Tom 1: Vvodnye i obshchie voprosy planktonologii (Plankton of the Seas and Continental Waters, Vol. 1: Instructions and General Questions of Planktonology), Leningrad: Nauka, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Krylov, P.I. and Panov, V.E., Resting eggs in the life cycle of Cercopagis pengoi, a recent invader of the Baltic Sea, Arch. Hydrobiol., Spec. Iss. Adv. Limnol., 1998, vol. 52, pp. 383–392.Google Scholar
  11. Laxson, C.L., McPhedran, K.N., Makarewicz, J.C., Telesh, I.V., and MacIsaac, H.J., Effects of the nonindigenous cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi on the lower food web of Lake Ontario, Freshwater Biol., 2003, vol. 48, pp. 2094–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Litvinchuk, L.F. and Telesh, I.V., Distribution, population structure and ecosystem effects of the invader Cercopagis pengoi (Polyphemoidea, Cladocera) in the Gulf of Finland and the open Baltic Sea, Oceanologia, 2006, vol. 48, suppl., pp. 243–257.Google Scholar
  13. Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F.D. and Riv’er, I.K., Khishchnye vetvistousye Podonidae, Polyphemidae, Cercopagidae i Leptodoridae fauny mira (The Predatory Cladocera (Podonidae, Polyphemidae, Cercopagidae and Leptodoridae) of the World), Leningrad: Nauka, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. Naumenko, E.N., Strukturno-funktsional’naya organizatsiya zooplanktona Vislinskogo zaliva Baltiiskogo moray (Structural and Functional Organization of the Zooplankton in the Vistula Lagoon of the Baltic Sea), Kaliningrad: Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Ojaveer, H. and Lumberg, A., On the role of Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov) in Parnu Bay and the NE part of the Gulf of Riga ecosystem, Proc. Est. Acad. Sci., Ecol., 1995, vol. 5, nos. 1–2, pp. 20–25.Google Scholar
  16. Riv’er, I.K. and Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F.D., Materials to biology of Caspian Polyphemidae, in Plankton i bentos vnutrennikh vodoemov (Plankton and Benthos of Inland Water Bodies), Kuzin, B.S., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1966, no. 12 (15), pp. 159–169.Google Scholar
  17. Rudinskaya, L.V. and Gusev, A.A., Invasion of the North American wedge clam Rangia cuneata (G.B. Sowerby I, 1831) (Bivalvia: Mactridae) in the Vistula Lagoon of the Baltic Sea, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2012, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salazkin, A.A., Ivanova, M.B., and Ogorodnikova, V.A., Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po sboru i obrabotke materialov pri gidrobiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh na presnykh vodoemakh. Zooplankton i ego produktsiya (Methodical Recommendations for the Collection and Processing of Materials in Hydrobiological Studies on Fresh Water Bodies. Zooplankton and Its Products), Leningrad: Gos. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Ozern. Rechn. Rybn. Khoz., 1984.Google Scholar
  19. Senin, Yu.M., Smyslov, V.A., and Khlopnikov, M.M., General characteristics of the Vistula Lagoon, in Zakonomernosti gidrobiologicheskogo rezhima vodoemov raznogo tipa (Regularities of the Hydrobiological Regime of Water Bodies of Various Types), Alimov, A.F., Ed., Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2004, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  20. Stolbunova, V.N. and Kozhevnikov, A.P., Modified model of planktonobatometer for the work with a boat, Inf. Byull. Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 1977, no. 33, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
  21. Telesh, I.V., Influence of biological invasions on the diversity and functioning of zooplankton communities in the estuarine ecosystems of the Baltic Sea (review), Izv. Samar. Nauch. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 220–232.Google Scholar
  22. Telesh, I.V., Small details of big importance: carbon mass determination in the invasive cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi (Ostroumov, 1891) by the high temperature combustion method, NeoBiota, 2017, vol. 33, pp. 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.33.9823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Telesh, I.V., Krylov, P.I., Bol’shchagin, P.V., Litvinchuk, L.F., and Panov, V.E., Features of biology of Ponto-Caspian species Cercopagis pengoi (Crustacea, Onicyjpoda) in the Baltic Sea, in Vidy-vselentsy v Evropeiskikh moryakh Rossii (Invasive Species in the European Seas of Russia), Matishov, G.G., Ed., Apatity: Kol’sk. Nauch. Tsentr, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaliningrad State Technical UniversityKaliningradRussia
  2. 2.Atlantic Research Institute of Fisheries and OceanographyKaliningradRussia

Personalised recommendations