Advertisement

Direct Simulation of Moderately Rarefied Gas Flows within Core Samples

  • V. A. BalashovEmail author
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the numerical simulation of isothermal moderately rarefied gas flows in three-dimensional spaces with a complex voxel geometry corresponding to the pore space of core (rock) samples. Classical Maxwell slip boundary conditions are used to take into account the slippage effect on the solid boundaries. The simulation results for several core samples under different averaged pressures are presented. The qualitatively correct dependence of the Klinkenberg slippage coefficient on the absolute intrinsic permeability is obtained.

Keywords:

quasi-hydrodynamic equations digital rock physics slippage effect slip boundary condition Klinkenberg slippage coefficient moderately rarefied gas voxel geometry 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was carried out under the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-31-00400 mol_a). The author thanks Ph. D. E.B. Savenkov (Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences) for their numerous discussions and the attention he paid to this work. This work was performed using the high-performance computational resources of the Federal Center of Shared Usage at the Russian Scientific Center Kurchatov Institute, http://computing.kiae.ru/.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    C. Soulaine, F. Gjetvaj, C. Garing, S. Roman, A. Russian, P. Gouze, and H. A. Tchelepi, “The impact of sub-resolution porosity of X-ray microtomography images on the permeability,” Transp. Porous Media 113, 227–243 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. J. Blunt, B. Bijeljic, H. Dong, O. Gharbi, S. Iglauer, P. Mostaghimi, A. Paluszny, and C. Pentland, “Pore-scale imaging and modelling,” Adv. Water Res. 51, 197–216 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Dong and M. J. Blunt, “Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images,” Phys. Rev. E 80, 036307 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Ranut, E. Nobile, and L. Mancini, “High resolution X-ray microtomography-based CFD simulation for the characterization of flow permeability and effective thermal conductivity of aluminum metal foams,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 67, 30–36 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Escoda, F. Willot, D. Jeulin, J. Sanahuja, and C. Toulemonde, “Estimation of local stresses and elastic properties of a mortar sample by FFT computation of fields on a 3D image,” Cement Concrete Res. 41, 542–556 (2011).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Balashov, “Direct simulation of moderately rarefied gas flows in two-dimensional model porous media,” Math. Models Comput. Simul. 10, 483 (2018).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. V. Sheretov, Dynamics of Continuous Media with Space-Time Averaging (Regular. Khaotich. Dinamika, Moscow, Izhevsk, 2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. N. Chetverushkin, Kinetic Schemes and Quasi-Gasdynamic System of Equations (CIMNE, Barcelona, 2008; MAKS Press, Moscow, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. G. Elizarova, Quasi-Gas Dynamic Equations (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009; Nauch. Mir, Moscow, 2007).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    GOST (State Standard) No. 26450.2-85, Mountain rocks. Methods for determining reservoir properties. Method for determining the absolute gas permeability coefficient for stationary and non-stationary filtration.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. J. Klinkenberg, “The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases,” in Drilling and Production Practice (Am. Pet. Inst., 1941), pp. 200–213.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. N. Kogan, Rarefied Gas Dynamics (Springer, US, 1969; Nauka, Moscow, 1967).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. V. Sivuhin, General Course of Physics, Vol. 2: Thermodynamics and Molecular Physics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. A. Zlotnik, “On conservative spatial discretizations of the barotropic quasigasdynamic system of equations with a potential body force,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 56, 303–319 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. A. Balashov and V. E. Borisov, “Numerical algorithm for 3D moderately rarefied gas flows simulation within domains with voxel geometry,” KIAM Preprint No. 99 (Keldysh Inst. Appl. Math., Moscow, 2017). http://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.aspıd=2017-99.  https://doi.org/10.20948/prepr-2017-99
  16. 16.
    Imperial College, London. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/earth-science/research/research–groups/perm/ research/pore-scale-modelling/micro-ct-images-and-networks/.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. S. Basniev, N. M. Dmitriev, R. D. Kanevskaya, and V. M. Maksimov, Underground Fluid Mechanics (Inst. Kompyut. Issled., Moscow, Izhevsk, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. A. Bikulov, “Modeling of transport phenomena in porous media on hybrid supercomputer systems,” Cand. Sci. (Phys. Math.) Dissertation (Lomonosov Mosc. State Univ., Moscow, 2015).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Degruyter, A. Burgisser, O. Bachmann, and O. Malaspinas, “Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and lattice Boltzmann simulations of gas flow through volcanic pumices,” Geosphere 6, 470–481 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palabos: Parallel Lattice Boltzmann Solver. http://www.palabos.org/.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. I. Kotyahov, Physics of Oil and Gas Reservoirs (Nedra, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Tiab and E. C. Donaldson, Petrophysics. Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, 4th ed. (Gulf Professional, 2015), p. 918.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. H. Tang, W. Q. Tang, and Y. L. He, “Gas slippage effect on microscale porous flow using the lattice Boltzmann method,” Phys. Rev. E 72, 056301 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Gao, Q. Yu, and X. Lu, “Apparent permeability and gas flow behavior in carboniferous shale from the Qaidam basin, China: an experimental study,” Transp. Porous Med. 116, 585–611 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. Saxena, R. Hofmann, F. O. Alpak, J. Dietderich, and S. Hunter, “Effect of image segmentation and voxel size on micro-CT computed effective transport and elastic properties,” Marine Pet. Geol. 86, 972–990 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. G. Heid, J. J. McMahon, R. F. Nielsen, and S. T. Yuster, “Study of the permeability of rocks to homogeneous fluids,” in Drilling and Production Practice (Am. Pet. Inst., 1950), pp. 230–244.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. O. Jones and W. W. Owens, “A laboratory study of low-permeability gas sands,” J. Pet. Technol. 32, 1631–1640 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Tanikawa and T. Shimamoto, “Comparison of Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability and water permeability in sedimentary rocks,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. 46, 229–238 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations