Advertisement

Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 434–443 | Cite as

Experience of a Synthetic Approach to an Ecological Classification of Vascular Epiphytes

  • N. M. DerzhavinaEmail author
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract—

On the basis of an investigation into epiphytic ferns and taking into account the literature data, information on ecological classifications of vascular epiphytes has been summarized and a multiple ecological classification is proposed in which vascular epiphytes are grouped into three blocks of morphofunctional types (MFT): facultative epiphytes (protoepiphytes), obligate epiphytes (holoepiphytes), and hemiepiphytes. The main criterion underlying this division is the degree of specialization of plants to the epiphytic life pattern. Each group includes several subgroups diverging on the basis of the presence of special morphological structures providing epiphytes with nutrients and water under conditions of their deficit, as well as life under the conditions of low irradiation and high hydrature. Within the subgroups, the variants are distinguished and the preadaptive and adaptive mechanisms used by the epiphytes in order to cope with the specific environment are defined for the variants. Physiofunctional types with specialization to an epiphytic mode of life are distinguished as well.

Keywords:

ecological classification protoepiphytes holoepiphytes hemiepiphytes preadaptive and adaptive mechanisms morphofunctional and physiofunctional types 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am sincerely grateful to I.V. Tatarenko (The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) and Prof. K. Kondo (Hiroshima University, Japan), who graciously provided the opportunity for collecting field materials as part of their expeditions.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of interests. The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Barkman, J.J., Phytosociology and Ecology of Cryptogamic Epiphytes, Assen: Van Gorcum, 1958, p. 9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benzing, D.H., Vascular Epiphytes: General Biology and Related Biota, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Derzhavina, N.M., Biomorphology and anatomy of homosporous ferns (epilithophytes, epiphytes, amphibious and aquatic) in connection with adaptatiogenesis, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derzhavina, N.M., Ecological anatomy of fern fronds, Modern Phytomorphol., 2013, vol. 5, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derzhavina, N.M., Anatomical and morphological adaptations of homosporous fern Crepidomanes latealatum (Hymenophyllaceae) to specific environmental conditions, Turzchaninowia, 2018, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Es’kov, A.K., Ecophysiological classification of vascular epiphytes as a theoretical premise of building collections and communities of epiphytic plants in a hothouse culture, Estestv. Tekh. Nauki, 2012, no. 4, pp. 93–98.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gentry, A. and Dodson, C., Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard., 1987, vol. 74, pp. 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gladkova, V.N., Orchidaceae, in Zhizn’ rastenii (Life of the Plants), Takhtadzhyan, A.L., Ed., Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1982, vol. 6, pp. 248–275.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holbrook, N.M. and Putz, F.E., Physiology of tropical vines and hemiepiphytes: plants that climb up and plants that climb down, in Tropical Plant Ecophysiology, Mulkey, S. Chazdon, P.L., and Smith, A.P., Eds., New York: Chapman and Hall, 1995, pp. 363–393.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosokawa, T., Ecological studies of tropical epiphytes in forest ecosystem, Adv. Trop. Ecol., 1968, vol. 2, pp. 482–501.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ignat’eva, I.P. and Andreeva, I.I., Metamorfozy vegetativnykh organov pokrytosemennykh (Metamorphoses of Vegetative Organs of Angiosperms), Moscow: Mosk. S-kh. Akad., 1991, part 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knapp, R., Die Vegetation von Afrika unter Berück-Sichtigung von Umwelt, Entwicklung, Wirtschaft, Agrar- und Forstgeographie. Vegetationsmonogr. der Einzelnen Großräume, Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1973, vol. 3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kress, W.J., The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes: an update, Selbyana, 1986, vol. 9, pp. 2–22.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lebrun, J., Observation sur les épiphytes de la forêt équatoriale congolaise, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, 1937, vol. 57, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lüttge, U., Epiphyten: evolution und Ökophysiologie, Naturwissenschaften, 1985, vol. 72, pp. 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lüttge, U., Vascular epiphytes: setting the scene, in Vascular Plants as Epiphytes: Evolution and Ecophysiology, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mazurenko, M.T. and Khokhryakov, A.P., Bryophyls as a specific ecological group of plants, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1989, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 64–73.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Müller, L., Starnecker, G., and Winkler, S., Zur Oekologie epiphytischer Farne in Südbrasilien I. Saugschüppen, Flora, 1981, vol. 171, pp. 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oliver, W.R.B., New Zealand epiphytes, J. Ecol., 1930, vol. 18, pp. 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pessin, L.J., An ecological study of the polypody fern Polypodium polypodioides as an epiphyte in Mississippi, Ecology, 1925, vol. 6, pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richards, P.W., The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruinen, J., Epiphytosis. A second view on epiphytism, Ann. Bogoriensis, 1953, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–157.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schimper, A.F.W., Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas, Botanische Mittheilungen aus den Tropen no. 2, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1888.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schimper, A.F.W. and Faber, F.C., Pflanzengeographie auf Physiologischer Grundlage, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1935.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schneider, H., The root anatomy of ferns: a comparative study, in Pteridology in Perspective, Kew: R. Bot. Gardens, 1996, pp. 271–283.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schnell, R., Introduction à la Phytogéographie des Pays Tropicaux: Les Problèmes Généraux, Paris: Gauthier-Vitlars, 1970, vols. 1–2.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shorina, N.I. and Derzhavina, N.M., The mode of rythmological evolution of ferns, Turzchaninowia, 2015, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Terekhin, E.S., About the terms “saprophyte”, “hemisaprophyte” and “hemiparasite” in terms of the character of biotic relation of some angiosperms, Bot. Zh., 1965, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsavkelova, E.A., Microorganisms associated with greenhouse orchids, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsutsumi, C. and Kato, M., Phylogeny and the evolution of epiphyte in Davalliaceae, in Perspectives in Pteridophytes, Verma, S.C., Khullar, S.P., and Cheema, H.K., Eds., Dehradun: Bischen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, 2009, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Volkov, I.V., Vvedenie v ekologiyu vysokogornykh rastenii (Introduction into Ecology of High-Altitude Plants), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Went, F.A., Über Haft- und Nährwurzeln bei Kletterpflanzen und Epiphyten, Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, 1895, vol. 12, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Went, F.W., Soziology der Epiphyten eines tropischen Urwaldes, Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, 1940, vol. 50, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhuk, A.V., Origin of parasitism in flowering plants, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 3: Biol., 2001, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 24–37.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zotz, G., The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes—a critical update, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 2013a, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 453–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zotz, G., ‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history, Ann. Bot., 2013b, vol. 111, pp. 1015–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zotz, G., Plants on Plants—The Biology of Vascular Epiphytes, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orel State UniversityOrelRussia

Personalised recommendations