Advertisement

Numerical Analysis and Applications

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 323–331 | Cite as

An Algorithm of Linear Combinations: Thermal Conduction

  • V. I. MashukovEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents computational algorithms that make it possible to overcome some difficulties in the numerical solving boundary value problems of thermal conduction when the solution domain has a complex form or the boundary conditions differ from the standard ones. The boundary contours are assumed to be broken lines (the 2D case) or triangles (the 3D case). The boundary conditions and calculation results are presented as discrete functions whose values or averaged values are given at the geometric centers of the boundary elements. The boundary conditions can be imposed on the heat flows through the boundary elements as well as on the temperature, a linear combination of the temperature and the heat flow intensity both at the boundary of the solution domain and inside it. The solution to the boundary value problem is presented in the form of a linear combination of fundamental solutions of the Laplace equation and their partial derivatives, as well as any solutions of these equations that are regular in the solution domain, and the values of functions which can be calculated at the points of the boundary of the solution domain and at its internal points. If a solution included in the linear combination has a singularity at a boundary element, its average value over this boundary element is considered.

Keywords

algorithmof linear combinations thermal conduction,mixed boundary conditions arbitrary form of boundary surfaces complex constraints steady state problems linear combination of solutions composite boundary conditions method of conjugate gradients Trefftz method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yasnitskii, L.N., On a Method of Solving Problems of Harmonic Functions and Linear Elasticity Theory, in Prochnostnye i gidravlicheskie kharakteristiki mashin i konstruktsii (Strength and Hydraulic Characteristics ofMachines and Constructions), Perm: Perm Polytechnic Institute, 1973, pp. 78–83.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yasnitskii, L.N., Metod fiktivnykh kanonicheskikh oblastei v mekhanike sploshnykh sred (Fictitious Canonical DomainMethod in Continuum Mechanics),Moscow: Nauka, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gladkii, S.L. and Yasnitskii, L.N., Solving 3D Heat Conduction Problems by Fictitious Canonical Domain Method, Vest. Perm.Univ. Mat. Mekh. Inform., 2011, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gladkii, S.L. and Yasnitskii, L.N., Solving Problems of Linear Thermal Elasticity by Fictitious Canonical Domain Method, Dinamika i prochnost’ mashin. Vest. Perm. Univ., 2003, no. 4, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trufanov, N.A., Matveenko, V.P., and Shardakov, I.N., Metod geometricheskogo pogruzheniya v teorii uprugosti (Geometric ImmersionMethod in Elasticity Theory), Yekaterinburg: UrB RAS, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kostyuchenko, S.V., A Method of Nonorthogonal Series for the Nonideal Conjugate Elliptic Problems with Discontinuous Coefficients, Vych. Tekhnol., 2000, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–64.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kobylinskii, Yu.V., Popkova, T.L., and Slepyan, G.Ya., The Method of Non-Orthogonal Series for the Numerical Solving Problems of Mathematical Physics, Zh. Vych. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 1988, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 237–246.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolshakov, A.Yu. and Eltyshev, V.A., Solving Three-Dimensional Problems of Elasticity Theory by the Fourier Method, in Staticheskie i dinamicheskie zadachi uprugosti i vyazkouprugosti, Sverdlovsk: UNTs USSR Acad. Sci., 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kupradze, V.D. and Aleksidze, M.A., The Method of Functional Equations for Approximate Solving Certain Boundary Value Problems, Zh. Vych. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 1964, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 683–715.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aleksidze, M.A., Reshenie granichnykh zadach metodom razlozheniya po neortogonal’nym funktsiyam (Solving Boundary Value Problems by Method of Decomposition in Terms of Non-Orthogonal Functions),Moscow: Nauka, 1978.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kupradze, V.D.,Metody potentsiala v teorii uprugosti (Potential Methods in Elasticity Theory),Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kupradze, V.D., Gegelia, T.G., Basheleishvili,M.O., and Burchuladze, T.V., Trekhmernye zadachi matematicheskoi teorii uprugosti i termouprugosti (Three-Dimensional Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity and Thermoelasticity),Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mashukov, V.I. and Osinov, V.A., Spectral Estimation of CalculationAccuracy in Elasticity Theory Problems, Mekh. Tverd. Tela, 1990, vol. 4, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mikhlin, S.G., Variatsionnye metody v matematicheskoi fizike (Variational Methods in Mathematical Physics),Moscow: Nauka, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mashukov, V.I., Algoritm lineinykh kombinatsii dlya resheniya granichnykh zadach teorii uprugosti i teploprovodnosti (Algorithm of Linear Combinations to Solve Boundary Value Problems of Elasticity Theory and Heat Conduction), The Siberian State University of Means of Communication, Available from VINITI, 2016, Novosibirsk, no. 55–2016.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mashukov, V.I., An Outer Layer Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems of Elasticity Theory, Num. An. Appl., 2017, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 237–243.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hageman, L. and Young, D., Prikladnye iteratsionnye metody (Applied IterativeMethods),Moscow:Mir, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuznetsov, S.B., An Algorithm for Solving Quasilinear Elliptic Equations in Domains with Sources at Internal Boundaries, Preprint of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 1983, preprint no. 476.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Siberian State University of Means of CommunicationNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations