Advertisement

Inland Water Biology

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 435–447 | Cite as

Rheophilic Macrozoobenthos Communities of the Southern Himalayas

  • M. V. Chertoprud
  • D. M. Palatov
  • E. S. Chertoprud
ZOOPLANKTON, ZOOBENTHOS, AND ZOOPERIPHYTON
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The regional diversity of rheophilic macrozoobenthos communities in North India and Nepal has been studied based on material collected from 450 original quantitative samples in 160 small and large watercourses within the altitude gradient of 200–2800 m above sea level. A total of 22 types of communities from 5 classes are identified: rhithral (hard substrates at rapid flow), crenal (mosaic substrates of small watercourses), pelal (soft sediments), phytal (macrophyte beds), and rhipal (mosaic substrates of river bank edge). Many of the community types occur in different altitudinal temperature zones, but their composition and structure vary as the study proceeds further into the mountains. It has been shown that oriental tropical taxa dominate the lowland tropical zone, endemic subtropical taxa dominate the mid-mountain zone, and Palearctic (Central Asian) groups dominate the high-mountain zone. The key features of tropical rheophilic communities are described in comparison with temperate zone communities. The application of the Ramensky–Grime classification of ecological strategies to macrozoobenthos communities is discussed.

Keywords:

macrozoobenthos altitudinal zonation watercourses Himalayas Nepal India 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Alimov, A.F., Metabolism intensity in aquatic poikilotherms, in Obshchie osnovy izucheniya vodnykh ekosistem (General Principles of the Study of Aquatic Ecosystems), Leningrad: Nauka, 1979, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhadin, V.I., The fauna of rivers and reservoirs, Tr. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 519–919.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palatov, D.M., Altitude variability of rheophilic macrobenthic communities of the Caucasus and Transcaucasia, in Materialy dokladov II Vserossiiskoi shkoly-konferentsii “Ekosistemy malykh rek: bioraznoobrazie, ekologiya, okhrana” (Proc. II All-Russia School-Conference “The Ecosystems of Small Rivers: Biodiversity, Ecology, and Protection”), Yaroslavl: Filigran’, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 314–317.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramenskii, L.G., Vvedenie v kompleksnoe pochvenno-geobotanicheskoe issledovanie zemel' (Introduction to Complex Soil-Geobotanical Study of Lands), Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1938.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Semenov Tyan-Shanskii, A.P., The main features of the history of alpine faunas, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Mat. Estestv. Nauk, 1937, pp. 1211–1222.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chertoprud, M.V., Biogeographical zoning of fresh waters of Eurasia by the macrobenthic fauna, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2010, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 144–162.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chertoprud, M.V., Diversity and classification of rheophilic macrobenthic communities of the temperate zone of European Russia, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2011, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chertoprud, M.V., Diversity of rheophilic macrobenthic communities, in Materialy lektsii II Vserossiiskoi shkoly-konferentsii “Ekosistemy malykh rek: bioraznoobrazie, ekologiya, okhrana” (Proc. II All-Russia School-Conference “The Ecosystems of Small Rivers: Biodiversity, Ecology, and Protection”), Yaroslavl: Filigran’, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 112–124.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chertoprud, M.V. and Palatov, D.M., Macroscale ecotone effects for the stream macrobenthic fauna and communities of the eastern Novosibirsk region, Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2013, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braun-Blanquet, J., Pflanzensociologie, Wien: Springer-Verlag, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brewin, P. and Ormerod, S., Macroinvertebrate drift in streams of the Nepalese Himalaya, Freshwater Biol., 1994, vol. 32, pp. 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brewin, P., Buckton, S., and Ormerod, S., The seasonal dynamics and persistence of stream macroinvertebrates in Nepal: do monsoon floods represent disturbance?, Freshwater Biol., 2000, vol. 44, pp. 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chertoprud, M. and Palatov, D., Rheophilic communities of macrobenthos of the southwestern Kola Peninsula, Inland Water Biol., 2013, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 305–313. doi 10.1134/S1995082913040056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chertoprud, M. and Palatov, D., Stream macrozoobenthic communities of the eastern Balkans, Inland Water Biol., 2017, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 286–295. doi 10.1134/S1995082917030051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dudgeon, D., Tropical Asian Streams: Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conservation, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gopal, B. and Zutshi, D., Fifty years of hydrobiological research in India, Hydrobiologia, 1998, vol. 384, pp. 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grime, J., Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, Chichester: J. Wiley Publ., 1979.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Identification of Freshwater Invertebrates of the Mekong and Its Tributaries, Vientyan: Mekong River Commission, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Illies, J., Versuch einer allgemeinen biozönotischen Gliederung der Fliessgewässer, Int. Rev. Gesamt. Hydrobiol., 1961, vol. 46, pp. 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Milner, A., Brittain, J., Castella, E., and Petts, G., Trends of macroinvertebrate community structure in glacier-fed rivers in relation to environmental conditions: a synthesis, Freshwater Biol., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 1833–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morse, J., Liangfang, Y., and Lixin, T., Aquatic Insects of China Useful for Monitoring Water Quality, Nanjing: Hohai Univ. Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ormerod, S., Rundle, S., Wilkinsos, S., et al., Altitudinal trends in the diatoms, bryophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish of a Nepalese river system, Freshwater Biol., 1994, vol. 32, pp. 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palatov, D. and Chertoprud, M., The rheophilic fauna and invertebrate communities of the tundra zone: a case study of the southern Yamal, Inland Water Biol., 2012, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–28. doi 10.1134/S1995082912010117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palatov, D. and Chertopud, M., Macrozoobenthic communities of compact grounds in streams of eastern Black Sea region, Russ. J. Ecol., 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pradhan, B., Water Quality Classification Model in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region: The Bagmati River in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Kathmandu: Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rundle, S., Jenkins, A., and Ormerod, S., Macroinvertebrate communities in streams in the Himalaya, Nepal, Freshwater Biol., 1993, vol. 30, pp. 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharma, R., Bhanot, G., and Singh, D., Aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India, Environmentalist, 2004, vol. 24, pp. 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suren, A., Macroinvertebrate communities of streams in western Nepal: effects of altitude and land use, Freshwater Biol., 1994, vol. 32, pp. 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vannote, R., Minshall, G., Cummins, K., et al., The river continuum concept, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci, 1980, vol. 37, pp. 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Chertoprud
    • 1
  • D. M. Palatov
    • 1
  • E. S. Chertoprud
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations