Geology of Ore Deposits

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 381–390 | Cite as

The New Massadou Diamondiferous Kimberlite Field in Guinea

  • V. P. AfanasievEmail author
  • E. I. Nikolenko
  • N. V. Glushkova
  • I. D. Zolnikov


A new Massadou kimberlite field, was discovered in southeastern Guinea, near the town of Macenta. It consists of 16 poorly diamondiferous kimberlite dikes, ~1 m thick on average. The ore-controlling zone has a width of around 600 m, its orientation corresponds to the K-4 trend after S. Haggerty, and it is quite well detectable in satellite images. A thick laterite weathering profile has developed on the kimberlites. The main indicator minerals are pyrope, chromite, and ilmenite. Ilmenite grains have a zoned structure with a high-Fe core (hemoilmenite) overgrown by a parallel-columnar aggregate of Mg-ilmente rim resulting from interaction of the core phase with kimberlitic melt. The age of kimberlites is estimated as 140–145 Ma by analogy with those in adjacent areas. Dikes occur as an independent form of kimberlite magmatism in the Guinean–Liberian shield, rather than being roots of kimberlite pipes; therefore, the erosion cutout is relatively small and large-scale diamond placers should not be expected.


Guinean–Liberian shield kimberlite diamond kimberlite indicator minerals tectonic control of kimberlites 



  1. 1.
    Afanas’ev, V.P., Zinchuk, N.N., and Pokhilenko, N.P., Morfologiya i morfogenez indikatornykh mineralov kimberlitov (Morphology and Morphogenesis of Indicator Minerals of Kimberlites), Novosibirsk: Manuskript, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Afanas’ev, V.P., Zinchuk, N.N., and Pokhilenko, N.P., Poiskovaya mineralogiya almaza (Prospecting Mineralogy of Diamond), Novosibirsk: Geo, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clifford, T.N., Tectono-metallogenic units and metallogenic provinces of Africa, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1966, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 298–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haggery, S.I., Diamond potential of West Africa: structural position and productivity of kimberlites, Geol. Geofiz., 1992, no. 10, pp. 44–60.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nekos, V.V., On find of bedrock diamond source within the Massadou diamond project area (Guinea Repiblic), Shchelochnye kompleksy Tsentral’noi Sibiri (Alkaline Complexes of Central Siberia), Krasnoyarsk: KNIIGGiMS, 2003, pp. 125–131.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nikolenko, E.I., Afanas’ev, V.P., and Pokhilenko, N.P., Peculiarities of the composition of zoned picroilmenites from the Massadou Field (Giunea) and Dachnaya Pipe (Yakutia) kimberlites, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2010, vol. 434, no. 2, pp. 1386–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skinner, E.M.W., Apter, D.B., Morelli, C., and Smithson, N.K., Kimberlites of the Man Craton, West Africa, Lithos, 2004, pp. 233–259.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sobolev, N.V., Mineralogical criteria of the diamond potential of kimberlites, Geol. Geofiz., 1971, no. 3, pp. 70–80.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yanse, A.D., New approach to the classification of cratons, Geol. Geofiz., 1992, no. 10, pp. 12–32.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zubarev, B.M., Daikovyi tip almaznykh mestorozhdenii (Dike Type of Diamond Deposits), Moscow: Nedra, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Afanasiev
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. I. Nikolenko
    • 1
  • N. V. Glushkova
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. D. Zolnikov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations