Advertisement

Studies on Russian Economic Development

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 627–636 | Cite as

Integrating Russia into the Global Project of Digital Transformation: Opportunities, Problems and Risks

  • N. A. GanichevEmail author
  • O. B. Koshovets
ECONOMIC POLICY
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Can the worldwide development of the digital economy relaunch global economic growth? What is really ensured the projected high growth rates of digital economy made by international institutions? Will the program for the development of the digital economy in the Russian Federation be able to stimulate the competitiveness of Russia’s economy? Firstly, this article seeks to answer if high expectations placed on digital economy are equal to its real impact on the global economic growth in the long-term. It appears that despite widespread declarations the development of the digital economy is not a sustainable path for engendering rapid growth of the world economy rather an attempt to consolidate asserts globally for building a fundamentally new digital infrastructure based on microelectronic and software products on a worldwide scale and create numerous new mass markets for ICT and microelectronics TNC. Given that the authors show that at the global level, in fact two different models of the digital economy development are implemented: one for developed countries and the other for developing ones. The digital transformation model offered by international institutions to developing countries might lead to the loss of technological sovereignty and consolidation of the long-term status of “technological periphery.” Based on this analysis the authors consider Russian digital economy development program, which ignores several extremely important aspects of the implementation of international projects of digital transformation. The measures outlined in the program may not fully meet the stated goals, at least in terms of maintaining technological independence.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    M. Löffler and A. Tschiesner, The Internet of Things and the Future of Manufacturing (McKinsey & Company, 2013). http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/the_internet_of_things_and_the_future_of_manufacturing/.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Crown Publishing Group, 2016; EKSMO, Moscow, 2016).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Rifkin, The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011; Al’pina non-fikshn, Moscow, 2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. B. Koshovets and N. A. Ganichev, “Nanotechnology contribution to innovation-driven growth: Hype or hope?,” J. Int. Sci. Publ.: Econ. Bus. 10, 546–561 (2016).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Frolov, “Institutional logic of technological progress. The case of nanotechnology,” Zh. Inst. Issled. 4 (1), 49–64 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. B. Koshovets and N. A. Ganichev, “Global digital transformation and its goals: Declarations, reality, and a new growth mechanism,” Ekon. Nauka Sovrem. Ross., No. 4, 126–143 (2018).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ICT for Economic Growth: A Dynamic Ecosystem Driving the Global Recovery (Davos, 2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Perez, “The double bubble at the turn of the century: Technological roots and structural implications,” Cambridge J. Econ. 33 (4), 779–805 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Srnichek, Capitalism of Platforms (Vyssh. Shk. Ekon., Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Promising Directions for the Development of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in the Digital Economy of Russia, Ed. by E. V. Yaluner and M. I. Lubochkina (S.-Peterb. Gos. Ekon. Univ., 2018) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017 (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2017).  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264276284-en.
  12. 12.
    OECD and World Bank, Inclusive Global Value Chains: Policy Options in Trade and Complementary Areas for GVC Integration by Small and Medium Enterprises and Low-Income Developing Countries (OECD and World Bank Group Publishing, Washington, DC, 2015).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The 2018 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard: World—2500 Companies Ranked by R&D (2018). http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard18.html.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Zwillenberg, D. Field, and D. Dean, Greasing the Wheels of the Internet Economy (BCG, 2014).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Internet Economy in the G-20 (The Boston Consulting Group, 2012).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Digital Russia: A New Reality (McKinsey Global Institute, 2017).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    PwC, Sizing the Prize.What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise? (2017).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O. B. Koshovets and N. A. Ganichev, “Nanotechnology and the new technological revolution: Expectations and Reality,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 28 (4), 391–397 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2017–2022 (2019).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Grijpink, A. Menard, H. Sigurdsson, and N. Vucevic, The Road to 5G: The Inevitable Growth of Infrastructure Cost (McKinsey & Company, 2018). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/telecommunications/our-insights/the-road-to-5g-the-inevitable-growth-of-infrastructure-cost.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Mallinson, “Analyst Angle: 5G investment threatened by tech titans snatching financial growth from mobile operators,” RCRWirelessNews, Sept. 20 (2017). https://www.rcrwireless.com/20170920/opinion/analyst-angle-5g-investment-threatened-by-tech-titans-snatching-financial-growth-from-mobile-operators-tag10#prettyPhoto.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. I. Moiseichik and T. I. Faradzhov, “Financial and technological sovereignty as a principle for the development of the paradigm of the global social market economy,” J. Soc. Mark. Econ., No. 2, 47–66 (2015).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. E. Frolov, “The concept of the economic and technological mechanism for the accelerated development of the knowledge-intensive high-tech sector of the economy and its theoretical foundations,” Kontseptsii, No. 1, 27–58 (2007).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Executive Office of the President, US National Science and Technology Council, A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing (2012).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    US National Economic Council, US Office of Science and Technology Policy, Strategy for American Innovation (2015).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), The New High-Tech Strategy.Innovations for Germany (2014).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    UK Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, Growth Review Framework for Advanced Manufacturing (2010).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    UK Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, Eight Great Technologies (2012).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ministere de l’Economie et des Finances, La Nouvelle France Industrielle (2015).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Measuring the Digital Economy. A New Perspective (OECD Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy, Ed. by S. Baller, S. Dutta, and B. Lanvin (World Economic Forum, Genewa, 2016).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    “G20 Leaders’ Communiqué,” in Antalya Summit (2015).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    The Program Digital Economy of the Russian Federation, Approved by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2017 No. 1632-r. http://government.ru/docs/28653/.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    I. Korolev, “How authorities to distribute 2.79 trillion for Digital Economy. Cost plan,” Cnews, Sept. 17 (2018). http://cnews.ru/link/n428731.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. E. Frolov, “Heterogeneity of the dynamics of the global economy and “innovation pause:” Causes and possible consequences,” Probl. Teor. Prakt. Upr., No. 6, 130–135 (2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic Forecasting, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations