Application of The Method of Optimized Delta-Transformations in the Control Landing Problem for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

  • P. P. Kravchenko
  • L. I. KulikovEmail author
  • V. V. ScherbininEmail author


The control landing problem for an aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in the vertical plane is considered. In this paper we propose a discrete method of controlling a continuous object, called the method of optimized delta-transformations, which is based on the choice of the control parameters at each step of discretization, which allow minimizing the time duration of the transient process when deviating from the program trajectory, taking into account the restrictions imposed on the control signals. We also made a comparison with the classical method of control generation in the proportional-derivative control circuit. The goal of both methods is to compensate the deviation of the center of mass of the unmanned aerial vehicle from the program flight trajectory. Comparative results of the numerical simulation of the flight of an unmanned aerial vehicle at the landing stage with ideal and noisy measurements of the flight parameters are given.



  1. 1.
    I. A. Mikhalev, B. N. Okoemov, I. G. Pavlina, M. S. Chikulaev, and N. M. Eidinov, Automatic Aircraft Control Systems. Methods of Analysis and Calculation (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Kolesnikov, New Non-Linear Flight Control Methods (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. S. Gamkrelidze, and E. F. Mischenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1976; Pergamon, Oxford, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Aleksandrov, V. G. Boltyanskii, S. S. Lemak, N. A. Parusnikov, and V. M. Tikhomirov, Optimization of the Dynamics of Controlled Systems, The School-Book (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. P. Kravchenko, “Accuracy characteristics definition of nonlinear dynamic systems condition parameters variation estimations,” Mekhatron., Avtomatiz., Upravl., No. 5 (134), 6–15 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. D. Venediktov, Yu. P. Zhenevskii, V. V. Markov, and G. S. Eidus, Delta Modulation. Theory and Application (Svyaz’, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Steel, Delta Modulation Systems (Pentech, London, UK, 1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. P. Kravchenko, Fundamentals of the Theory of Optimized Second Order Delta Transformations. Digital Control, Compression and Parallel Processing of Information (TRTI, Taganrog, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. P. Kravchenko, Optimized Second Order Delta Transforms. Theory and Application (Radiotekhnika, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. P. Kravchenko, “High-performance delta modulation algorithms optimized for speed and accuracy,” Elektrosvyaz’, No. 9, 44–47 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. D. Krut’ko, Inverse Problems of the Dynamics of Controlled Systems: Linear Models (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. A. Fel’dbaum, Fundamentals of the Theory of Optimal Automatic Systems (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. P. Kravchenko, N. A. Khusainov, and V. V. Shcherbinin, Synthesis of Digital Control Algorithms for Multi-Mode Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Optimized Second-Order Delta Transformations (Yuzh. Fed. Univ., Taganrog, 2017) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. I. Kulikov, “Synthesis of the flight control UAV flight control algorithm at the landing stage,” in Proceedings of the 10th All-Russia Conference on Perspective Systems and Control Problems and 6th Youth School-Seminar on Control and Processing of Information in Technical Systems (Yuzh. Fed. Univ., Taganrog, 2015), Vol. 1, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. I. Kulikov, “Synthesis of automatic control for plane-type UAV landing and stability analysis of desired motion regimes,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat. 22, 209–220 (2017).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. P. Kravchenko, N. Sh. Khusainov, and V. V. Shcherbinin, “On the methodology for solving the problem of controlling an aircraft based on second-order delta transformations and principles of controlling a trolley with an inverted pendulum,” in Proceedings of the 21st St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems (Elektropribor, St. Petersburg, 2014), pp. 121–126.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. S. Byushgens and R. V. Studnev, The Dynamics of the Aircraft. Spatial Motion (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. L. Aleksandrov, Propellers (Gos. Izd. Oboron. Prom-sti, Moscow, 1951) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. V. Shcherbinin, G. A. Kvetkin, and P. D. Zinov’ev, “Development of comprehensive integrated automatic control system including radiotechnical local navigation system for unmanned aerial vehicle problem formulation,” Izv. Tul’sk. Univ., Tekh. Nauki, No. 11 (3), 60–67 (2016).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. V. Shcherbinin, G. A. Kvetkin, A. V. Izmailov-Perkin, and E. V. Shevtsova, “The research of autonomous local radio navigation system precision characteristics when used on stationary objects,” Izv. Tul’sk. Univ., Tekh. Nauki, No. 11 (3), 53–60 (2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. V. Smirnov and A. V. Izmailov-Perkin, “Software implementation of algorithm of autonomous local radio navigation system for automated landing system,” Izv. Tul’sk. Univ., Tekh. Nauki, No. 6, 45–55 (2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AO Central Scientific Research Institute of Automatics and HudraulicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations