Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 51, Issue 12, pp 1497–1506 | Cite as

Nitrogen in Chernozems under Traditional and Direct Seeding Cropping Systems: A Review

  • A. A. ZavalinEmail author
  • V. K. Dridiger
  • V. P. Belobrov
  • S. A. Yudin
AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract—

The functional role of nitrogen in the formation of crop yield on chernozems under conditions of traditional and direct seeding (DS) cropping systems is considered. In the course of long-term experimental studies of DS cropping system on chernozems, considerable experience has been gained and has found efficient practical application. It is shown that the effect of nitrogen as the most important element in the composition of humic substances influencing the fertility of chernozems depends on the variability of environmental factors, the forms and rates of nitrogen fertilizers, the rotation systems, and the soil treatment technologies. The DS cropping system has been tested for 4–10 years on experimental fields of the Stavropol Agricultural Research Institute and in a number of farms in Stavropol region. The obtained data on the yields of cereal crops and the application of fertilizers attest to the importance of the formation of a mulching layer of plant residues on the surface of ordinary and southern chernozems in the DS systems. This layer contributes to a gradual accumulation of nitrogen, protects the soil from erosion, and increases the number and mass of earthworms. Nitrogen in the DS cropping systems on chernozems in Russia is characterized by the high mobility and the capacity for considerable transformation. In this context, further investigations and special experiments are necessary to gain better knowledge of the behavior of nitrogen in different cropping systems. In particular, the relationships between nitrogen fluxes, agrophysical soil properties (aggregate-size distribution at the macro and micro levels), and specificity of the organic matter in different subtypes of chernozems under different cultivation technologies have to be clarified. In general, the role of DS cropping systems in farming practices has become more significant in the recent years; application of the DS cropping system is considered a positive factor in maintaining and restoring soil fertility.

Keywords:

no-till technology direct seeding immobilization mineralization crop rotation mineral nitrogen fertilizers organic matter 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    H. P. Allen, Direct Drilling and Reduced Cultivation (Farming Press, Ipswich, 1981; Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Yu. Vernichenko and E. N. Mishustin, Use of Hay as a Compensating Fertilizer (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. N. Vlasenko, I. N. Sharkov, E. E. Sineshchekov, and A. S. Prozorov, “Reduced tillage and nitrogen mineralization,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 34, 993–998 (2001).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. G. Vlasenko and T. P. Sadokina, “Agricultural technologies for optimization of phytosanitary state of barley crops,” Zemledelie, No. 6, 30–31 (2010).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Vlasenko, N. G. Vlasenko, and N. A. Korotkikh, “Development of no-till technology on leached chernozem in the forest-steppe of West Siberia,” Zemledelie, No. 5, 20–22 (2011).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. M. Garmashov, “Influence of major l tillage of ordinary chernozem on the agrophysical parameters,” Zemledelie, No. 6, 12–14 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. K. Dridiger, “Problems of the application of zero tillage systems in the Stavorpol region and their solution,” Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, No. 7, 18–20 (2012).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. K. Dridiger, “Technology of direct seeding in Argentine,” Zemledelie, No. 1, 21–24 (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. K. Dridiger, “Analysis of farming systems without soil tillage,” Zemledelie, No. 7, 24–26 (2014).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. K. Dridiger and N. N. Shapovalova, “Climate, soil, and economic predispositions for implementation of farming without soil tillage in the Stavropol region,” Byull. Stavrop. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Selsk. Khoz., No. 6, 58–67 (2014).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. K. Dridiger and R. S. Stukalov, “Evaluation of no-till technology for cultivation of winter wheat compared with traditional method in the zone of unstable moistening of the Stavropol region,” Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK 29 (10), 39–42 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. K. Dridiger, Practical Guide for Crop Growing without Soil Tillage in the Dry Zone of Stavropol region (Stavropol, 2016) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. K. Dridiger, A. V. Nevecherya, G. Taran, and N. N. Shapovalova, “Ipatov’s experience for crop growing without soil tillage (no-till technology),” AgroSnabForum, No. 3, 35–40 (2017).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. K. Dridiger, V. V. Kulintsev, R. S. Stukalov, and R. G. Gadzhiumarov, “The influence of cultivation technology of crops on the water-physical properties of ordinary chernozem during the first crop rotation in the zone of unstable moistening of the Stavropol region,” Izv. Orenb. Gos. Agrar. Univ., No. 4 (66), 39–43 (2017).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Zavalin, O. A. Sokolov, and N. Ya. Shmyreva, Nitrogen in Agricultural System on Chernozems (On the 125th Anniversary of V.V. Dokuchaev’s Expedition to Kamennaya Steppe) (Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. A. Zavalin, G. G. Blagoveshchenskaya, L. S. Chernova, et al., Standards for Analysis of the Input of the Biological Nitrogen of Legumes to the Nitrogen Balance in Russia (All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.L. Ivanov, “Russia’s soil cover amid global challenges,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 85, 495–503 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.L. Ivanov, I.Yu. Savin, V.S. Stolbovoy, “Quality of Russian soils for agricultural exploitation,” Russ. Agric. Sci. 40, 49–53 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. A. Kashchaev, “Agrophysical properties of soil and crop yield in crop rotation depending on cultivation technology,” Byull. Stavrop. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Sel. Khoz., No. 6, 98–106 (2014).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. A. Kashchaev, Candidate’s Dissertation in Agriculture (Stavropol, 2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. I. Kiryushin, “Minimization of soil tillage: discussion results,” Zemledelie, No. 4, 28–30 (2007).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. I. Kiryushin, “Minimization of soil tillage: prospects and challenges,” Zemledelie, No. 7, 3–6 (2013).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. M. Kogut, S. A. Sysuev, and V. A. Kholodov, “Water stability and labile humic substances of typical chernozems under different land uses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 496–502 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. N. Kudeyarov, Nitrogen Cycle in Soil and Efficiency of Fertilizers (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. A. Maksyutov, G. A. Kremer, and V. M. Zhdanov, “Zonal features of basic tillage of soil in Orenburg oblast,” Zemledelie, No. 1, 17–18 (2001).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. M. Nazaryuk and F. R. Kalimullina, “Efficiency of mineral fertilizers and plant residues during their long-term use,” Russ. Agric. Sci. 36, 35–38 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. N. Nikitishen, “Analysis of deep migration of nitrogen in soil,” in Migration of Pollutants in Soils and Adjacent Media (Leningrad, 1980) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. D. Pannikov and L. Yu. Vernichenko, “Improvement of soil fertility,” Vestn. S-kh. Nauk, No. 3, 43–45 (1984).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. N. Pryanishnikov, Nitrogen in Plant Life and in Farming Practices in the Soviet Union (Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. V. Rymar’, “Long-term use of different tillage systems and fertility of ordinary chernozem,” Zemledelie, No. 3, 22–23 (2007).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. S. Stukalov and V. K. Dridiger, “Influence of cultivation methods of winter wheat on the physical and chemical properties of ordinary chernozem in the central Caucasus region,” Izv. Orenb. Gos. Agrar. Univ., No. 3 (65), 27–31 (2017).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. I. Uvarov, Agroecological Problems of Soil Fertility in Forest-Steppe (Belgorod, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    G. I. Uvarov and V. D. Solovichenko, “Nitrogen regime of ordinary chernozem in crop rotation,” Agrokhimiya, No. 4, 5–10 (2009).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. A. Kholodov, N. V. Yaroslavtseva, V. I. Lazarev, and A. S. Frid, “Interpretation of data on the aggregate composition of typical chernozems under different land use by cluster and principal component analyses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 1026–1032 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. N. Cherkasov, I. G. Pykhtin, A. V. Gostev, L. B. Nitchenko, V. A. Plotnikov, G. P. Il’ina, and N. P. Gaponova, Theoretical Bases for Application of Zero and Surface Tillage Technologies for Grain Crops (Kursk, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. N. Cherkasov, I. G. Pykhtin, and A. V. Gostev, “Use of zero and surface basic tillage of soil in different regions,” Zemledelie, No. 5, 13–16 (2014).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    N. A. Chuyan and R. F. Eremina, “Change in nitrate nitrogen stock in typical chernozem layers during application of straw and plant residues with mineral fertilizers,” Russ. Agric. Sci. 37, 143–145 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. N. Sharkov, “Minimization of tillage and its influence on soil,” Zemledelie, No. 3, 24–27 (2009).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    V. C. Baligar and O. L. Bennett, “NPK-fertilizer efficiency—a situation analysis for the tropics,” Fertil. Res. 10, 147–163 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    R. L. Blevins, G. W. Thomas, M. S. Smith, W. W. Frye, and P. L. Cornelius, “Changes in soil properties after 10 years continuous non-tilled and conventionally tilled corn,” Soil Tillage Res. 3, 135–146 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. M. Carefoot, M. Lindwall, and J. M. Nyborg, “Tillage induced soil changes related grain yield in a semi-arid region,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 70, 203–214 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. W. Doran and M. S. Smith, “Organic matter management and utilization of soil and fertilizer nutrients,” in Soil Fertility and Organic as Critical Component of production Systems (Soil Science Society of America, Fitchburg, WI, 1987), Vol. 19, pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. B. Fenn and L. B. Fenn, “Ammonia loss and associated reaction of urea in calcareous soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 45, 537–540 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    L. E. Gauer, C. F. Shaykewich, and E. N. Stobbe, “Soil temperature and soil water use under zero tillage in Manitoba,” Can. J. Soil. Sci. 62, 311–327 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    W. L. Hargrove, D. E. Kissel, and L. B. Fenn, “Field measurements of ammonia volatilization from surface applications of ammonium salts to a calcareous soil,” Agric. J. 69, 473–476 (1977).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    G. P. Lafond, H. Loeppky, and D. A. Derksen, “The effect of tillage system and crop rotation on soil water conservation, seedling establishment and crop yield,” Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 103–105 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    R. L. Lemake, R. C. Izaurralde, M. Nyborg, and E. D. Solberg, “Tillage and N source influence soil-emitted nitrous oxide in the Alberta Parkland region,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 61, 247–253 (1999).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. S. Malhi and M. Nyborg, “Effect of tillage and straw on yield and N uptake on barley grown under different N fertility regimes,” Soil Tillage Res. 17, 115–124 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. S. Malhi, J. M. Nyborg, and E. D. Solberg, “Influence of source, method of placement simulated rainfall on the recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizers under zero tillage,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 76, 93–100 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    K. J. McInness, R. B. Ferguson, D. E. Kissel, and E. T. Kanemasu, “NH3 loses from application of urea-ammonium nitrate solution to straw residue,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 969–974 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R. D. Mengel, D. W. Nelson, and D. M. Nuber, “Placement of nitrogen fertilizers for no-till and conventional till corn,” Agron. J. 74, 515–518 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Neborg and S. S. Malhi, “Effect of zero and conventional tillage on barley yield and N–NO3 content, moisture and temperature of soil in north-central Alberta,” Soil Tillage Res. 15, 1–9 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. M. Nyborg, E. D. Solberg, R. C. Jsaurralde, et al., “Influence of long-term tillage straw and N fertilizer on barley yield, plant-N uptake and soil-N balance,” Soil Tillage Res. 36, 165–174 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    R. E. Phillips, R. L. Blevins, G. W. Thomas, W. W. Frye, and S. H. Phillips, “No tillage agriculture,” Science 208, 1108–1113 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    D. A. Rowel, W. C. Stonebridge, and A. A. McNeill, “The effect in a long term trial of minimum and reduced cultivation on wheat yields,” Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 17, 802–811 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    G. L. Terman, “Volatilization of nitrogen as ammonia from surface applied fertilizers, organic amendments and crop residues,” Agron. J. 31, 189–223 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    G. M. Volk, “Volatile loss of ammonia following surface application for no-till corn production,” Agron. J. 74, 823–826 (1959).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    G. M. Volk, “Efficiency of fertilizer urea as affected by method of application, soil moisture and lime,” Agron. J. 58, 249–252 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    U. Zihlmann, P. Weisskopf, M. Muller, and R. Schafflutzel, “Dynamique de l`azote dans les sols sous semis direct ou sous labour,” Rev. Suisse Agr. 38 (5), 262–268 (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Zavalin
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • V. K. Dridiger
    • 2
  • V. P. Belobrov
    • 1
  • S. A. Yudin
    • 1
  1. 1.Dokuchaev Soil Science InstituteMoscowRussia
  2. 2.North Caucasus Federal Scientific Research Agricultural CenterMikhailovskRussia
  3. 3.Pryanishnikov All-Russia Research Institute of AgrochemistryMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations