Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 51, Issue 12, pp 1480–1486 | Cite as

Specific Features of the Microbial Community Development in Soddy-Podzolic Soil in the Course of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Growing

  • I. P. Pinchuk
  • L. M. PolyanskayaEmail author
  • N. P. Kirillova
  • A. L. Stepanov
SOIL BIOLOGY
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The development of microbial community in a soddy-podzolic soil (Albic Retisol) on the roots of common barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was studied. Morphometric characteristics of plant roots (length and surface area) were obtained with the help of scanning technique, and characteristics of root hairs were obtained by microscopy. The number of bacteria in barley rhizosphere and rhizoplane was estimated using the method of cascade filtration. A significant contribution (about 30%) of root hairs to the total surface area of barley root system was demonstrated. The germination of barley seeds was accompanied by an increase in the population of bacteria in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane by almost an order of magnitude; during the stage of the development of lateral roots, the density of bacterial cells on the root surface decreased by almost three times in comparison with the initial stage of root development.

Keywords:

rhizosphere and rhizoplane root surface root hairs sizes population density and biomass of bacteria 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, project no. 14-50-00029.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Ultrasonic pretreatment of soils for quantitative counting of microorganisms,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. Biol., Pochv., No. 3, 127–129 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. A. Kozhevin, L. M. Polyanskaya, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Development of different microorganisms in soil,” Mikrobiologiya 48, 490–494 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. V. Kravchenko, A. I. Shaposhnikov, and N. M. Makarova, “The composition of root exudates of the plants and its change in the rhizosphere affected by soil microflora,” S-kh. Biol., No. 3, 71–75 (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Krasil’nikov, Soil Microorganisms and Higher Plants (Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union, 1958) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2015; Moscow, 2017).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. E. Pavlovskaya, E. V. Kostomicheva, E. S. Kuleshova, I. V. Gor’kova, and I. N. Gagarina, “Barley as a source of antibiotics,” Vestn. Orlovsk. Gos. Agrar. Univ., No. 4 (37), 70–73 (2012).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. M. Polyanskaya, R. B. Gorodnichev, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Sizes of bacterial cells in soils determined by cascade filtration technique,” Biol. Bull. 40, 130–137 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. M. Polyanskaya, T. G. Mirchink, P. A. Kozhevin, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Change of the complex of soil micromycetes during microbial successions,” Mikrobiologiya 59, 349–354 (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. M. Polyanskaya, M. Kh. Orazova, T. G. Mirchink, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Dynamics of population and the structure of microbial complex in rhizosphere zone of pea plants,” Mikrobiologiya 63, 314–325 (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. M. Polyanskaya, I. P. Pinchuk, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Assessment of the number, biomass, and cell size of bacteria in different soils using the “cascade” filtration method,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 288–293 (2015). doi 10.1134/S1064229315030096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. M. Polyanskaya, A. L. Stepanov, and K. V. Chakmazyan, “The impact of hydrogen emission on the structure of soil microbial biomass,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 57–63 (2017). doi 10.1134/S1064229317010112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Skugoreva, The effect of mercury nitrate (III) on the growth and development of barley sprouts grown on hydroponics,” in Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific School “Relevant Problems of Regional Ecological Monitoring: Scientific and Educational Aspects” (Kirov, 2005), pp. 81–84.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. I. Shaposhnikov, A. A. Belimov, L. V. Kravchenko, and D. M. Vivanko, “Interaction of rhizosphere bacteria with the plants: formation and efficiency of associative symbioses,” S-kh. Biol., No. 3, 16–22 (2011).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. V. Shein and V. M. Goncharov, Agrophysics (Feniks, Rostov-on-Don, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Bais, T. Weir, L. G. Perry, S. Gilroy, and J. M. Vivanco, “The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms,” Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 57, 233–266 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Barthélémy and Y. Caraglio, “Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny,” Ann. Bot. 99 (3), 375–407 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Blagodatskaya and Y. Kuzyakov, “Active microorganisms as drivers of dynamic processes in soil: integration of basic teaching into research,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 67, 192–211 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Dennis, A. J. Miller, and P. R. Hirsch, “Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?” FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72, 313–327 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. A. Dixon, “Natural products and plant disease resistance,” Nature 411, 843–847 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Dorlodot, B. Forster, et al., “Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops,” Trends Plant Sci. 10, 474–481 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. W. M. Fan, A. N. Lane, J. Pedler, D. Crowley, and R. M. Higashi, “Comprehensive analysis of organic ligands in whole root exudates using nuclear magnetic resonance and gas chromatography—mass spectrometry,” Anal. Biochem. 251, 57–68 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. S. Gahoonia, D. Care, and N. E. Nielsen, “Root hairs and phosphorus acquisition of wheat and barley cultivars,” Plant Soil 191, 181–188 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. S. Gahoonia and N. E. Nielsen, “Barley genotypes with long root hairs sustains high grain yields in low-P field,” Plant Soil 262, 55–62 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Hackett and D. A. Rose, “Model of the extension and branching of a seminal root of barley and its use for studying relations between root dimensions,” Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 25, 669–679 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Jungk, “Root hairs and the acquisition of plant nutrients from soil,” Plant Natr. Soil Sci. 164, 121–129 (2001).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. P. Kirillova, G. A. Stasevich, P. A. Kozhevin, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Bacterial population-dynamics in a soil-plant system,” Microbiology (Moscow) 50, 94–98 (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Loeppmann, M. Semenov, E. Blagodatskaya, and Y. Kuzyakov, “Substrate quality affects microbial- and enzyme activities in rooted soil,” J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 179, 39–47 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Z. Ma, N. V. Bykova, and A. U. Igamberdiev, “Cell signaling mechanisms and metabolic regulation of germination and dormancy in barley seeds,” Crop J. 5, 459–477 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Smith and I. D. Smet, “Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 367, 1441–1452 (2012).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. I. Timonin, “The interaction of higher plants and soil microorganisms. I. Microbial populations of rhizosphere of seedlings of certain cultivated plants,” Can. J. Res. 18, 307–317 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Vercambre, L. Pagès, C. Doussan, and R. Habib, “Architectural analysis and synthesis of the plum tree root system in an orchard using a quantitative modeling approach,” Plant Soil. 251, 1–11 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. S. Walker, H. P. Bais, E. Grotewold, and J. M. Vivanco, “Root exudation and rhizosphere biology,” Plant Physiol. 132, 44–51 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. H. Weisenseel, A. Dorn, and L. Jaffe, “Natural H+ currents traverse growing roots and root hairs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.),” Plant Physiol. 64, 512–518 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. D. Willows, P. Worden, and M. Mirzaei, “Barley grain proteomics,” in Proteomics in Food Science: From Farm to Fork (Elsevier, London, 2017), pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    WinRHIZO: image analysis system. http://www.regentinstruments.com/assets/winrhizo_about.html.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Zhu, P. A. Ingram, P. N. Benfey, and T. Elich, “From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture,” Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 310–317 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. P. Pinchuk
    • 1
  • L. M. Polyanskaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. P. Kirillova
    • 1
  • A. L. Stepanov
    • 1
  1. 1.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations