Advertisement

Technical Physics

, Volume 64, Issue 5, pp 711–719 | Cite as

Bragg Deflectors of Wave Fluxes for High-Power Relativistic Masers

  • A. V. Arzhannikov
  • N. S. Ginzburg
  • V. Yu. Zaslavskii
  • P. V. Kalinin
  • N. Yu. PeskovEmail author
  • A. S. Sergeev
  • S. L. Sinitskii
PHYSICAL ELECTRONICS
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Quasi-optical Bragg structures that represent sections of planar waveguides with tilted (with respect to the beam propagation direction) corrugation are studied. It is shown that such structures may serve as efficient deflectors for high-power wave fluxes and, hence, can be used for separation of microwave radiation and electron beam in relativistic masers. The corrugation configuration is optimized to increase the efficiency of transformation of wave fluxes to the transverse direction and improve uniformity of the spatial distribution of scattered radiation. The simulated results are verified using cold electrodynamic tests.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to G.G. Denisov and V.I. Belousov for helpful discussions.

FUNDING

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-08-00811).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    N. F. Kovalev, I. M. Orlova, and M. I. Petelin, Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 11, 449 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. L. Bratman, G. G. Denisov, N. S. Ginzburg, and M. I. Petelin, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 19, 282 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Ciocci, R. Bartolini, A. Doria, G. P. Gallerano, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 928 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. S. Chu, F. V. Hartemann, B. G. Danly, and R. J. Temkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2391 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. W. Cross, N. S. Ginzburg, W. He, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 407, 181 (1998).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Yu. Peskov, N. S. Ginzburg, A. A. Kaminskii, A. K. Kaminskii, S. N. Sedykh, A. P. Sergeev, and A. S. Sergeev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 25, 429 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. K. Kaminsky, E. A. Perel’shtein, S. N. Sedykh, N. S. Ginzburg, S. V. Kuzikov, N. Yu. Peskov, and A. S. Sergeev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 36, 211 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. W. Fliflet, R. B. McCowan, C. A. Sullivan, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 285, 233 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Alberti, B. G. Danly, G. Gulotta, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2018 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. L. Bratman, G. G. Denisov, B. D. Kol’chugin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3102 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. B. Abubakirov, A. N. Denisenko, A. V. Savel’ev, E. I. Soluyanov, and V. V. Yastrebov, Tech. Phys. Lett 26, 141 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Benford, J. Swegle, and E. Shamiloglu, High Power Microwaves, 3rd ed. (CRC, 2015).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Arzhannikov, N. S. Ginzburg, V. Yu. Zaslavskii, V. G. Ivanenko, I. A. Ivanov, P. V. Kalinin, A. S. Kuznetsov, S. A. Kuznetsov, N. Yu. Peskov, A. S. Sergeev, S. L. Sinitskii, and V. D. Stepanov, JETP Lett. 87, 618 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Arzhannikov, N. S. Ginzburg, G. G. Denisov, P. V. Kalinin, N. Yu. Peskov, A. S. Sergeev, and S. L. Sinitskii, Tech. Phys. Lett. 40, 730 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Arzhannikov, N. S. Ginzburg, V. Yu. Zaslavskii, et al., Vestn. Novosib. Gos. Univ. Fiz. 7 (1), 5 (2012).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. V. Arzhannikov, N. S. Ginzburg, P. V. Kalinin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 114801 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. S. Ginzburg, N. Yu. Peskov, and A. S. Sergeev, J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 40, 401 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. V. Arzhannikov, N. S. Ginzburg, P. V. Kalinin, et al., EPJ Web Conf. 149, 05017 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. I. Belousov, V. A. Vershkov, G. G. Denisov, M. A. Khozin, and D. A. Shelukhin, Tech. Phys. Lett. 43, 1037 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Arzhannikov
    • 1
  • N. S. Ginzburg
    • 2
    • 3
  • V. Yu. Zaslavskii
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. V. Kalinin
    • 1
  • N. Yu. Peskov
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. S. Sergeev
    • 2
  • S. L. Sinitskii
    • 2
  1. 1.Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of SciencesNizhny NovgorodRussia
  3. 3.Lobachevsky State UniversityNizhny NovgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations