Physics of Particles and Nuclei

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 698–700 | Cite as

Differential Intensities of the 2ν2β-Transition in 100Мо

  • S. V. SemenovEmail author


The energy distribution of one electron and angular correlation parameter of two electrons in the two-neutrino double beta-decay of 100Мо have been calculated with the consideration of the contribution of excited 1+-states of the intermediate nucleus 100Тс. Two variants of signs of individual particular excited state contributions to the 2ν2β-transition amplitude are considered. The data of the experiment on the charge-exchange reaction 100Mo(3He, t)100Tc are used in the calculations.



  1. 1.
    A. S. Barabash, Nucl. Phys. A, 935, 52 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Tretyak and Yu. G. Zdesenko, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables, 80, 83 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. M. Gavrilyuk, A. M. Gangapshev, V. V. Kazarov, V. V. Kuzminov, S. I. Panasenko, and S. S. Ratkevich, Phys. Rev. C, 87, 035501 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Doi, T. Kotani, and E. Takasugi, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 83, 1 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Faessler and F. Šimkovic, J. Phys. G., 24, 2139 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Tomoda, Rep. Progr. Phys., 54, 53 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Arnold R., G. Augier, A. M. Bakalyarov, J. Baker, A. Barabash, Ph. Bernaudin, M. Bouchel, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, J. Cailleret, J. E. Campagne, D. Dasié, V. Egorov, K. Errahmane,A. I. Etienvre, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, 536, 79 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Arnold R., G. Augier, J. Baker, A. S. Barabash, A. Basharina-Freshville, M. Bongrand, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, C. Cebrián, A. Chapon, E. Chauveau, Th. Dafni, F. F. Doppisch, H. Diaz, D. Durand, et al., Eur. Phys. J. C., 70, 927 (2010).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Arnold, C. Augier, J. Baker, A. Barabash, G. Broudin, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, V. Caurier, V. Egorov, K. Errahmane, A. I. Etienvre, J. L. Guyonnet, F. Hubert, C. Jollet, S. Jullian, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 182302 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. V. Semenov, Phys. Part. Nucl., 48, 1018 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. K. L. Sjue, D. Melconian, A. Garcia, I. Ahmad, A. Algora, J. Äystö, V.-V. Elomaa, T. Eronen, J. Hakala, S. Hoedl, A. Kankainen, T. Kessler, I. D. Moore, F. Naab, H. Pentilä, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 70, 064317 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Abad, A. Morales, R. Nunez-Lagos, A. F. Pacheco, An. Fiz. A, 80, 15 (1984).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Civatarese and J. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C, 58, 1535 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Šimkovic, P. Domin, S. V. Semenov, J. Phys., 27, 2233 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. V. Semenov, F. Šimkovic, V. V. Khruschev, P. Domin, Phys. At. Nucl., 63, 1196 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu. A. Shitov, Phys. At. Nucl., 69, 2090 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. M. Watson, W. Pairsuwan, B. D. Anderson, A. R. Baldwin, B. S. Flanders, R. Madey, R. J. McCarthy, B. A. Braun, B. H. Wildenthal, C. C. Foster, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 1369 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18R18a.
    S. V. Semenov, AIP Conf. Proc., 942, 67 (2007);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18c.
    A. Ya. Balysh, V. V. Khruschov, V. P. Labozin, S. V. Semenov, G. O. Tsvetkov, in Proceedings of the III International Conference on Current Problems in Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 7–10, 2010, 414.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    J. H. Thies, T. Adachi, M. Dozono, H. Ejiri, D. Frekers, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, M. Fujivara, E.-W. Grewe, K. Hatanaka, P. Heinrichs, D. Ishikawa, N. T. Khai, A. Lennarz, H. Matzubara et al., Phys. Rev. C, 86, 044309 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Center Kurchatov InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations