Advertisement

Russian Microelectronics

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 157–166 | Cite as

Monte Carlo Simulation of Defects of a Trench Profile in the Process of Deep Reactive Ion Etching of Silicon

  • M. K. RudenkoEmail author
  • A. V. Myakon’kikhEmail author
  • V. F. LukichevEmail author
Article

Abstract

A numerical model of the evolution of a 2D profile during cryogenic etching of Si in SF6/O2 plasma is proposed and implemented. To calculate the fluxes of species a Monte Carlo method is used. The etch profile is presented with the help of square cells. The model is meant to investigate diverse defects in a profile of stochastic nature. For this, the state of a model cell is presented as a combination of states of several subcells randomly chosen upon each interaction of the species with the surface, which makes it possible to study small-scale profile defects without loss of calculation performance. They are compared with the experimental data, and good qualitative agreement is observed. Surface defects typical of high aspect ratio cryogenic etching are investigated numerically. They include the depth-dependent sidewall roughness, formation of cavities, trench splitting, and formation of “nanograss.”

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The investigation was carried out under the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, research project. no. 18-07-01190.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Miakonkikh, A.V., Rogozhin, A.E., Rudenko, K.V., Lukichev, V.F., Yunkin, V.A., and Snigirev, A.A., Elements for hard X-ray optics produced by cryogenic plasma etching of silicon, Proc. of SPIE, 2016, vol. 10224, p. 1022421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jansen, H.V., de Boer, M.J., Unnikrishnan, S., Louwerse, M.C., and Elwenspoek, M.C., Black silicon method: X. A review on high speed and selective plasma etching of silicon with profile control: an in-depth comparison between bosch and cryostat drie processes as a roadmap to next generation equipment, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2009, vol. 19, p. 033001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haidar, Y., Rhallabi, A., Pateau, A., Mokrani, A., Taher, F., Roqueta, F., and Boufnichel, M., Simulation of cryogenic silicon etching under SF6/O2/Ar plasma discharge, J. Vacuum Sci. Technol., A, 2016, vol. 34, p. 061306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lukichev, V. and Yunkin, V., Scaling of silicon trench etch rates and profiles in plasma etching, Microelectron. Eng., 1999, vol. 46, pp. 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishchuk, V., Olynick, D.L., Liu, Z., and Rangelow, I.W., Profile simulation model for sub-50 nm cryogenic etching of silicon using SF6/O2 inductively coupled plasma, J. Appl. Phys., 2015, vol. 118, p. 053302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blauw, M.A., van der Drift, E., Marcos, G., and Rhallabi, A., Modeling of fluorine-based high-density plasma etching of anisotropic silicon trenches with oxygen sidewall passivation, J. Appl. Phys., 2003, vol. 94, pp. 6311–6318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Valiev Institute of Physics and Technology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations