Journal of Mining Science

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 690–696 | Cite as

Prediction of the Environmental Impact of Mining Industry Based on Satellite Observations

  • S. P. MesyatsEmail author
  • S. P. Ostapenko
Mining Ecology


Environmental impact of mining is studied by two criteria: aerosol pollution and vegetation cover condition—using the data of long-term satellite observations. In terms of the mining and processing industry on the Kola Peninsula, environmental impact is predicted as overlapping of aerosol pollution areas and decrease in the vegetation index. It is shown that predicted boundaries of impact-zones match in case of one or two sources of effect, and unmatch in case of many sources. The proposed approach to integration of the remote sensing data allows differentiating between the environmental impact of mining and natural change of the vegetation cover.


Mine man-made aerosol effect vegetation cover satellite observation vegetation index geoinformation system prediction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jain, R.K., Cui, Z., and Domen, J.K., Environmental Impact of Mining and Mineral Processing, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chuvieco, E., Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, an Environmental Approach, CRC Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oparin, V.N., Potapov, V.P., Giniyatullina, O.L., Bykov, A.A., and Schastlivtsev, E.L., Integrated Monitoring of Induced Air Pollution in Mining Regions, J. Min. Sci., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 945–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kar, B. and Chow, E., Fusion of Multiscaled Spatial and Temporal Data: Techniques and Issues, Integrating Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Quattrochi, D.A., Wentz, E.A., Lam, Nina Siu-Ngan, Emerson, C.W. (Eds.), CRC Press. Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gamba, P. and Dell’Acqua, F., Data Fusion Related to GIS and Remote Sensing, Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing, Mesev, V. (Ed.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lovelius, N.V., Izmenchivost’ prirosta derev’ev. Dendroindikatsiya prirodnykh protsessov i antropogennykh vozdeistvii (Variability of Tree Growth. Dendroindication of Natural Processes and Anthropogenic Impacts), Leningrad: Nauka, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jordan, C.F., Derivation of Leaf-Area Index from Quality of Light on the Forest Floor, Ecology, 1969, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 663–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rouse, Jr J.W., Hass, R.H., Schell, J.A., and Deering, D.W., Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with ERTS, Proc. 3rd Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium, Washington, NASA Goddart Space Flight Center, 1974, vol. 1, pp. 309–317.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd, D.S. and Danson, F.M., Satellite Remote Sensing of Forest Resources: Three Decades of Research Development, Progress in Physical Geography, 2005, vol. 29, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wessels, K.J., Prince, S.D., Frost, P.E., and van Zyl, D., Assessing the Effects of Human-Induced Land Degradation in the Former Homelands of Northern South Africa with a 1 km AVHRR NDVI Time-Series, Remote Sens. Environ., 2004, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conijn, J., Bai, Z., Bindraban, P., and Rutgers, B., Global Changes of Net Primary Productivity, Affected by Climate and Abrupt Land Use Changes since 1981, Towards Mapping Global Soil Degradation, Report 2013/01, ISRIC-World Soil Information, Wageningen, ISRIC Report 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalabin, G.V., Qualitative Assessment of Vegetation in Disturbed Mining-and-Metallurgical Areas by the Remote and Surface Monitoring, J. Min. Sci., 2011, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bondur, V.G. and Vorobev, V.E., Satellite Monitoring of Impact Arctic Regions, Izvestiya. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2015, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 949–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yue, X. and Unger, N., Aerosol Optical Depth Thresholds as a Tool to Assess Diffuse Radiation Fertilization of the Land Carbon Uptake in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2017, no. 17, pp. 1329–1342.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiao, X., Braswell, B., Zhang, Q., Boles, S., Frolking, S., and Moore III, B., Sensitivity of Vegetation Indices to Atmospheric Aerosols: Continental-Scale Observations in Northern Asia, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, vol. 84, pp. 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mesyats, S.P. and Ostapenko, S.P., Satellite Data Based Assessment of Environment Impact of Mining Industry, Int. Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 2017, vol. 17, no. 41, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesyats, S.P., Ostapenko, S.P., and Zorin, A.V., Methodological Approach to the Assessment of Technology-Related Aerosol Pollution Based on Satellite Observations: Case Study of the Mineral Mining and Processing Complex in the Murmansk Region, Gorn. Promysh., 2016, no 6, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (USA).
  19. 19.
    Annual Reports on the Status of Environment in the Murmansk Region.
  20. 20.
    NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota ( DOI:
  21. 21.
    NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota ( DOI:
  22. 22.
    Mesyats, S.P., Ostapenko, S.P., and Averina, O.V., A Methodical Approach to Estimate the Impact of Mining Enterprises on Vegetation Cover Based on Satellite Data, GIAB, 2017, no. 10, issue 23, pp. 545–553.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
  24. 24.
    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008. Scholar
  25. 25.
    QGIS Development Team, QGIS Geographic Information System, Software Version 3.0.2. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
  26. 26.
    Talalaev, S.M., Atmospheric Conditions of Dust Formation at Tailings Dumps, Trudy GGO, 1986, 502, pp. 101–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mining Institute, Kola Science CenterRussian Academy of SciencesApatityRussia

Personalised recommendations