Advertisement

Journal of Mining Science

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 656–662 | Cite as

Mineralogical and Technological Assessment of Tin–Sulfide Mining Waste Dressability

  • T. S. YusupovEmail author
  • S. A. Kondrat’evEmail author
  • S. R. KhalimovaEmail author
  • S. A. Novikova
Mineral Dressing

Abstract

Mineralogical composition, structural changes and floatability of minerals in the content of the Novosibirsk Tin Works waste are examined. It is shown that casserite is totally unfloatable after long stay in tailings pond, while iron sulfides preserve flotation ability despite the fact that their structure is partly X-ray amorphous. Combining key beneficiation techniques allows production of concentrates with the tin content of 10% and higher, though the tin recovery is no more than 17.2% in this case, which prevents from recommending the combination dressing for application. In the article, the flotation circuit producing tin concentrate at the yield of 5% and recovery of 80%, which meets the requirements of fuming process and electric melting, is proposed and substantiated.

Keywords

Mining waste minerals casserite tin concentrate dressing flotation magnetic separation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Doctor of Technical Sciences G. I. Gazaleeva for the valuable methodological support.

References

  1. 1.
    Chanturia, V.A., Vaisberg, L.A., and Kozlov, A.P., Priority Directions of Research in the Field of Processing of Mineral Raw Materials, Obogashch. Rud, 2014, no. 2, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lebedev, I.S., D’yakov, V.E., and Terebenin, A.N., Kompleksnaya metallurgiya olova (Complex Metallurgy of Tin), Novosibirsk: Novosibirskiy pisatel’, 2004, 548 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yusupov, T.S., Kondrat’ev, S.A., and Baksheeva, Production-Induced Cassiterite-Sulfide Mine Waste Minerals Structural-Chemical and Technological Properties, Obogashch. Rud, 2016, no. 5, pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larionov, A.N., Terent’eva, E.A., Kanarskaya, A.V., and Vorob’ev, V.V., Dry Ore Preparation Methods: New Prospects, Proceedings of the 10th Congress of Ore Dressers of the CIS Countries, Moscow, 2015, pp. 497–500.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yusupov, T.S., Baksheeva, I.I., and Rostovtsev, V.I., Analysis of Different Type Mechanical Effects on Selectivity of Mineral Dissociations, J. Min. Sci., 2015, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1248–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Semenov, E.I. and Organova, N.I. Gel-Cassiterite, Mineralogicheskie issledovania (Mineralogical Studies), 1969, Moscow.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gazaleeva, G.I., Nazarenko, L.I., Shigaeva, V.I., and Vlasov, N.A., Features of Processing Tin-Bearing Tailings at the of Solnechny Mining and Processing Plant, J. Min. Sci., 2018, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tverdov, A.A., Zhura, A.V., and Nikishichev, S.V., Improvement of the Deposit Development Budgetary Efficiency Estimation and Socio-Economic Macro-Effect Valuation Method, Nedropolz.-XXI Vek, 2013, no. 3 (40), pp. 86–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Chinakal Institute of Mining, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations