Advertisement

Journal of Mining Science

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 609–616 | Cite as

A Comparative Assessment on Cement Raw Material Quarry Quality Distribution via 3-D Identification

  • A. C. OzdemirEmail author
  • A. Dag
  • T. Ibrikci
Mineral Mining Technology
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

In addition to capacity increase, quality also has critical importance in the cement industry. In a cement product process, the chemical properties based on the oxide composition are necessary in describing clinker characteristics. One of the most important parameters in cement product, Lime Saturation Factor (LSF) controls the ratio of alite to belite in the clinker and this factor is frequently used to evaluate the quality of cement. This study focuses on identifying LSF distribution in the site conditions. For this purpose, probabilistic (geostatistical) and non-probabilistic (neural network-based) algorithms have been used. 3D based analyses revealed some relationships in the site conditions. The accuracy studies performed by performance indicators specified that the non-probabilistic methods produced better statistical prediction capacity. Thus, the adaptive neural algorithms can ensure the results identify the quality distribution in connection with geological parameters.

Keywords

Cement quarry lime saturation factor geostatistics neural network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tutmez, B., A Data-Driven Study for Evaluating Fineness of Cement by Various Predictors, Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber, 2015, 6, pp. 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorrentino, F., Lime Saturation Factor: New Insight, Cement WapnoBeton, 2008, 2, pp. 82–88.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boughanmi, S., Iabidi, I., Tiss, H., and Megriche, A., The Effect of Marl and Clay Compositions on the Portland Cement Quality, J. of the Tunisian Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 18, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaaks, E.H., and Srivastava, R.M., An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, New York, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cressie, N., The Origins of Kriging, Mathematical Geology, 1990, vol. 22.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uygucgil, H. and Konuk, A., Reserve Estimation in Multivariate Mineral Deposits Using Geostatistics and GIS, J. Min. Sci., 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 993–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sides, E.J., Geological Modeling of Mineral Deposits for Prediction in Mining, Geol. Rundsch., 1997, vol. 86, pp. 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David, M., The Geostatistical Estimation of Porphyry-Type Deposits and Scale Factor Problems, Proc. Pribram Mining Symposium, Pribram, Czechoslovakia, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diehl, P., Quantification of the Term Geological Assurance in Coal Classification Using Geostatistical Methods, Schriftenreihe der GDMB Klassif, Von Lagerstatten, 1997, 79, pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bardossy, G., and Fodor, J., Traditional and New Ways to Handle Uncertainty in Geology, Natural Resources Research, 2001, 10, pp. 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dag, A. and Mert, B.A., Evaluating Thickness of Bauxite Deposit Using Indicator Geostatistics and Fuzzy Estimation, Resource Geology, 2008, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 188–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang, L.C. and Chang, F.J., Intelligent Control for Modeling of Real-Time Reservoir Operation, Hydrogeological Processes, 2001, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1621–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pahm, T.D., Grade Estimation Using Fuzzy-Set Algorithms, Mathematical Geology, 1997, 29, pp. 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wong, P., Aminzadeh, F., and Nikravesh, M., Soft Computing for Reservoir Characterization and Modeling, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bardossy, G. and Fodor, J., Evaluation of Uncertainties and Risks in Geology, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amini, M., Afyuni, M., Fathianpour, N., Khademi, H., and Flühler, H., Continuous Soil Pollution Mapping Using Fuzzy Logic and Spatial Interpolation, Geoderma, 2005, vol. 124, no. 3–4, pp. 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tutmez, B., An Uncertainty Oriented Fuzzy Methodology for Grade Estimation, Computing Geoscience, 2007, 33, pp. 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goovaerts, P., Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Webster, R. and Oliver, M., Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2007, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T., and Mizutani, E., Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence, Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London, 1997, 614.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang, J.S.R., ANFIS: Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1993, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ozkan, G. and Inal, M., Comparison of Neural Network Application for Fuzzy and ANFIS Approaches for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems, Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 24, pp. 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kosko, B., Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems, a Dynamical Systems Approach, Englewood Ciffs., NJ, Prentice Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jang, J.S.R. and Sun, C.T., Neuro-Fuzzy Modeling and Control, Proc. of the IEEE, 1995, vol. 83, no. 3.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fuller, R., Introduction to Neuro-Fuzzy Systems, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999, 289.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tutmez, B., Hatipoglu, Z., and Kaymak, U., Modelling Electrical Conductivity of Groundwater Using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, Computers & Geosciences, 2006, 32, pp. 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jang, J.S.R., Fuzzy Modeling Using Generalized Neural Networks and Kalman Filter Algorithm, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hayer, H. and Khosravi-Nikou, M.R., Multi-Component Catalyst Design for Oxidative Coupling of Methane Using ANFIS and ANN, Petroleum Science and Technology, 2014, 32, pp. 1357–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu, C. and Cao, L., A System Identification Method Based on Multi-Layer Perception and Model Extraction, Adv. Neural Netw, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Akay, M.F., Aci, Ç.İ., and Abut, F., Predicting the Performance Measures of a 2-Dimensional Message Passing Multiprocessor Architecture by Using Machine Learning Methods, Neural Network World, 2015, 3/15, pp. 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations