Russian Journal of Developmental Biology

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 291–296 | Cite as

Detection of DNA in Human Blastocyst Cavity Aspirate by Multiplex PCR

  • N. I. SesinaEmail author
  • E. Y. Voskoboeva
  • K. V. Krasnopolskaya
Embryogenesis and Carcinogenesis


Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a modern method of detection of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities in a human embryo before its transfer to the uterus. The genetic material is obtained by embryo biopsy. Here, we attempted to evaluate the efficiency of a method of noninvasive biopsy—aspiration of the blastocoel contents (blastocentesis) of human embryos. In this study, a biopsy was carried out human embryos with low morphological characteristics (3–4 CC according to Gardner grading) on day 6–7 of development. DNA obtained from the aspirate, as well as from the blastocyst, was analyzed by QF-PCR (quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction) after whole genome amplification. In total, 24 blastocysts and aspirate samples obtained from them were analyzed; assayable DNA was found in seven (29%) aspirate samples from the blastocyst cavity, and this DNA was identical to blastocyst DNA in five (71%) cases. Thus, it was shown that, using aspiration of the blastocoel fluid of the human embryo, it is possible to obtain DNA suitable for analysis by molecular genetic methods. The features and advantages of the use of multiplex QF-PCR method combined with whole genome amplification for studying DNA obtained during aspiration of the blastocoel fluid are discussed. The prospects of DNA obtainment by the noninvasive biopsy method for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in the routine practice of infertility treatment and prevention of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities in newborns are considered.


human embryo PGT embryo biopsy blastocyst cavity blastocentesis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bazanov, P.A., Mityushina, N.G., Yutkin, E.V., et al., Optimization of the management of patients when performing preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Vestn. Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov, Ser.: Med., 2013, no. 5, pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
  2. Debrock, S., Melotte, C., Spiessens, C., et al., Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial, Fertil. Steril., 2010, vol. 93, pp. 364–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gardner, D., Schoolcraft, W., Wagley, L., et al., A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in IVF, Hum. Reprod., 1998, vol. 13, pp. 3434–3440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gianaroli, L., Magli, M.C., Pomante, A., et al., Blastocentesis: a source of dna for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study, Fertil. Steril., 2014, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1692–1699.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammond, E.R., Shelling, A.N., and Creel, L.M., Nuclear and mitochondrial dna in blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium: evidence and potential clinical use, Hum. Reprod., 2016, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1653–1661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Handyside, A.H., 24-Chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies, Fertil. Steril., 2013, vol. 100, pp. 595–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuliev, A. and Verlinsky, Y., Place of preimplantation diagnosis in genetic practice, Am. J. Med. Gen., 2005, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, G., Garnova, E., Reagin, M., et al., A improved multiple displacement amplification with phi29 DNA polymerase for genotyping of single human cells, Bio-Techniques, 2008, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 879–890.Google Scholar
  9. Liu, L., Li, Y., Li, S., et al., Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems, J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2012, vol. 2012, p. 251364. doi 10.1155/2012/25136.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Markoulatos, P., Siafakas, N., and Moncany, M., Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a practical approach, J. Clin. Lab. Anal., 2002, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 47–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mastenbroek, S., Twisk, M., van Echten-Arends, J., et al., In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening, N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, vol. 357, pp. 9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Palini, S., Galluzzi, L., De Stefani, S., et al., Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2013, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 603–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Skryabin, N.A., Lebedev, I.N., Artyukhova, V.G., et al., Molecular karyotyping of cell-free DNA from blastocoele fluid as a basis for noninvasive preimplantation genetic screening of aneuploidy, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1123–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G.D., et al., The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, Fertil. Steril., 2017, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 393–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zheng, Y.M., Wang, N., Li, L., et al., Whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis, J. Zhejiang. Univ. Sci. B, 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. I. Sesina
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Y. Voskoboeva
    • 2
    • 3
  • K. V. Krasnopolskaya
    • 4
  1. 1.Family International ClinicMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Research Center for Medical GeneticsRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Progress Lab Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory of Human ReproductionMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and GynecologyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations