Advertisement

Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 418–425 | Cite as

Nondestructive Testing of CubSat Satellite Body Using Laser Vibrometry

  • D. A. DerusovaEmail author
  • V. P. Vavilov
  • N. V. Druzhinin
  • O. I. Kazakova
  • V. O. Nekhoroshev
  • V. V. Fedorov
  • S. Yu. Tarasov
  • V. Yu. Shpil’noi
  • E. A. Kolubaev
VIBRATION DIAGNOSTICS
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The high reliability of modern 3D printing technologies makes it possible to create structural elements for aerospace and rocket industry products. Currently, the team of authors are developing a system for designing and additive manufacturing of composite and polymer structures for high-tech applications. In this paper, we studied the body of a Tomsk-TPU-120 CubSat satellite, the first Russian spacecraft to contain additive manufactured elements. Device quality control was carried out using resonant ultrasonic stimulation in conjunction with the use of scanning Doppler laser vibrometry, as well as experimental modal analysis. The testing results made it possible to reveal a defect at the butt end surface of the satellite body by analyzing the amplitude-frequency characteristic of surface vibrations. Experimental vibration-scanning data were used to verify a mathematical model developed using the ANSYS software.

Keywords:

CubSat satellite 3D printing modal analysis additive technologies scanning Doppler laser vibrometry local defect resonance 

Notes

FUNDING

The methodolody of resonance ultrasonic vibrometry and experimental results (section 3.2) was done at Tomsk Polytechnic University by D.A. Derusova, V.Yu. Shpil’noi and supported by Russian Science Foundation under grant no. 18-79-00029. Introduction, Section 1 and Section 2 of this article were done with the support of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Competitiveness Enhancement Program. Experimental results (section 3.1) was done by the Fundamental Research Program of the State Academies of Sciences for 2013-2020, line of research III.23.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Brian, E., Practical 3D Printers—the Science and Art of 3D Printing, New York: Apress, 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huber, C., Abert, C., Bruckner, F., et al., 3D print of polymer bonded rare-earth magnets, and 3D magnetic field scanning with an end-user 3D printer, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2016, vol. 109, no. 16, article no. 162401.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goh, G.D., Agarwala, S., Goh, G.L., Dikshit, V., Sing, S.L., and Yeong, W.Y., Additive manufacturing in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Challenges and potential, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 63, pp. 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cranston, B., AIGhofaily, M., and Palazotto, A., Design and structural analysis of unique structures under an internal vacuum, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 68, pp. 68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rego, I.S, Marcos, T.V.C., Pinto, D.R., et al., Ground experimentation with 3D printed scramjet inlet models at hypervelocities, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 55, pp. 307–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, P., Tan, X., He, C., Nai, M.L.S., Huang, R., Tor, S.B., and Wei, J., Scanning optical microscopy for porosity quantification of additively manufactured components, Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 21, pp. 350–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simonetti, F., Satow, I.L., Brath, A.J., Wells, K.C., Porter, J., Hayes, B., and Davis, K., Cryo-ultrasonic NDE: ice-cold ultrasonic waves for the detection of damage in complex-shaped engineering components, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Eng., 2018, vol. 65, pp. 638–647.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2796387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dao, P.B., Klepka, A., Pieczonka, Ł., Aymerich, F., and Staszewski, W.J., Impact damage detection in smart composites using nonlinear acoustics–cointegration analysis for removal of undesired load effect, Smart Mater. Struct., 2017, vol. 26, article no. 035012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fierro, G., Calla, D., Ginzburg, D., Ciampa, F., and Meo, M., Nonlinear ultrasonic stimulated thermography for damage assessment in isotropic fatigued structures, J. Sound Vib., 2017, vol. 404, pp. 102–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solodov, I., Resonant vibration nonlinearity in acoustic wave-defect interaction, AIP Conf. Proc. 1685, 2015, article no. 020003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Derusova, D.A., Vavilov, V.P., Guo, X., and Druzhinin, N.V., Comparing the efficiency of ultrasonic infrared thermography under high-power and resonant stimulation of impact damage in a CFRP composite, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 356—362.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830918050030
  12. 12.
    Xiamen Dynachem Import & Export Trading Co.,Ltd, 2017 (accessed December 13, 2017).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G., Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Wiley, 2012. 4th Ed.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ANSYS® Mechanical APDL, Release 16.1, Help System, Structural Analysis Guide, ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solodov, I., Pfleiderer, K., Gerhard, H., Predak, S., and Busse, G., New opportunities for NDE with air-coupled ultrasound, NDT & E Int., 2006, vol. 39, pp. 176–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solodov, I., Resonant acoustic nonlinearity of defects for highly-efficient nonlinear NDE, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2014, vol. 33, pp. 252–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-014-0229-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hettler, J., Tabatabaeipour, M., Delrue, S., and Van Den Abeele, K., Detection and characterization of local defect resonances arising from delaminations and flat bottom holes, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2017, vol. 3, article no. 2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-016-0380-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krasnoveikin, V.A., Smolin, I.Y., Druzhinin, N.V., Kolubaev, E.A., and Derusova, D.A., Modal testing circuit board assembly of an electronic apparatus by laser vibrometry, IOP Conf. Ser: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, vol. 156. article no. 012005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/156/1/012005
  19. 19.
    Rahammer, M. and Kreutzbruck, M., Fourier-transform vibrothermography with frequency sweep excitation utilizing local defect resonances, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 86, pp. 83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vavilov, V., Chulkov, A., and Derusova, D., IR thermographic characterization of low energy impact damage in carbon/carbon composite by applying optical and ultrasonic stimulation, Proc. SPIE, Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 2014, vol. 9105, pp. 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.07.023 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vavilov, V., Marinetti, S., Pan, Y., and Chulkov, A., Detecting water ingress in aviation honeycomb panels: qualitative and quantitative aspects, Polym. Test., 2016, vol. 54, pp. 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Derusova
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. P. Vavilov
    • 2
  • N. V. Druzhinin
    • 1
  • O. I. Kazakova
    • 3
    • 4
  • V. O. Nekhoroshev
    • 5
  • V. V. Fedorov
    • 2
  • S. Yu. Tarasov
    • 1
  • V. Yu. Shpil’noi
    • 2
  • E. A. Kolubaev
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia
  2. 2.Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia
  3. 3.Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia
  4. 4.Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation EnergiaKorolevRussia
  5. 5.Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations