Advertisement

Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 54, Issue 11, pp 765–775 | Cite as

On the Use of Multipurpose Software Packages for Solving Problems of Magnetostatics

  • V. V. Dyakin
  • O. V. Kudryashova
  • V. Ya. RaevskiiEmail author
Electromagnetic Methods
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The main advantages and disadvantages of universal software packages designed to solve problems of magnetostatics are indicated. The problems arising from the use of such packages are discussed, and possible ways to overcome these barriers are suggested.

Keywords

multipurpose software packages finite element method problems of magnetostatics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chernykh, I.V., Reshenie polevykh zadach s pomoshch’yu programmy ELCUT 4.2 (Solving Field Problems Using the ELCUT 4.2 Program), Yekaterinburg: Ural State Tech. Univ., 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhidkov, A.V., Primenenie sistemy ANSYS k resheniyu zadach geometricheskogo i konechno-elementnogo modelirovaniya (Application of the ANSYS System to Solving Problems of Geometrical and Finite-Element Modeling), Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Univ., 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mikhlin, S.G., Lineinye uravneniya v chastnykh prozivodnykh (Linear Partial Differential Equations), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Descloux, J., Metod konechnykh elementov (Finite Element Method), Moscow: Mir, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rektorys, K., Variational Methods in Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Springer, 2001, 2nd Ed.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andreev, V.B. and Rukhovets, L.A., Proektsionnye metody (metod konechnykh elementov) (Projection Methods (Finite Element Method)), Moscow: Znanie, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fletcher, C.A.J., Computational Galerkin Methods, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ivanov, D.V. and Dol’, A.V., Vvedenie v Ansys Workbench/Ucheno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya studentov estestvenno-nauchnykh distsiplin (Introduction to Ansys Workbench. A Tutorial for Students of Natural Sciences), Saratov: Amirit, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frizen, V.E., Chernykh, I.V., Bychkov, S.A., and Tarasov, F.E., Metody rascheta elektricheskikh i magnitnykh polei/Uchebnyi komplekt (Methods for Calculating Electric and Magnetic Fields. A Training Kit), Yekaterinburg: Ural Fed. Univ., 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andreeva, E.G., Shamets, S.P., and Kolmogorov, D.V., Raschet statsionarnykh magnitnykh polei i kharakteristik elektrotekhnicheskikh ustroistv s pomoshch’yu programmnogo paketa Ansys (Calculation of Stationary Magnetic Fields and Characteristics of Electrical Devices Using the Ansys Software Package), Omsk: Omsk State Tech. Univ., 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kizhaev, I.V., Andryushchenko, V.Yu., Karnaukhov, N.A., Yuferev, M.S., and Timofeev, S.P., Comparative analysis of FEM-based software packages, SCI-ARTICLE.RU, 2017, no. 43. pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisenko, V.G., Chislennye raschety elektromagnitnykh polei v elektricheskikh mashinakh na osnove metoda konechnykh elementov (Numerical Calculations of Electromagnetic Fields in Electrical Machines Based on the Finite Element Method), Moscow: Moscow Power Eng. Inst., 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pechenkov, A.N., Scherbinin, V.E., Shleenkov, S.A., and Bulychev, O.A., Computational relationships for the development of software for calculating magnetostatic fields from flaws in arbitrarily shaped ferromagnetic products, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reutov, Yu.Ya., Gobov, Yu.L., and Loskutov, V.E., Feasibilities of using the ELCUT software for calculations in nondestructive testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2002, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dyakin, V.V., Umergalina, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Ya., The field of a finite defect in a 3D semispace, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2005, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dyakin, V.V., Raevskii, V.Ya., and Umergalina, O.V., A magnetostatic problem for a semispace with a spherical defect in an inhomogeneous external field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2007, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dyakin, V.V., Rayevskiy, V.Y., and Kudrjashova, O.V., The field of a finite defect in a plate, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dyakin, V.V., Raevskii, V.Ya., and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a sphere, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyakin, V.V. and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a cylinder, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dyakin, V.V. and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a pipe, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dyakin, V.V., Kudryashova, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Y., Exact solution of one problem of magnetostatics in bipolar coordinates (continued), Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pechenkov, A.N. and Scherbinin, V.E., Nekotorye pryamye i obratnye zadachi tekhnicheskoi magnitostatiki (Some Direct and Inverse Problems of Technical Magnetostatics), Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dyakin, V.V., Kudryaschova, O.V., and Raevskii V.Y., One approach to solving the basic equation of magnetostatics in the case of nonhomogeneous magnets, Theor. Math. Phys., 2016, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shur, M.L., Smorodinskii, Y.G., and Novoslugina, A.P., The magnetic field of an arbitrary shaped defect in a plane-parallel plate, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shcherbinin, V.E. and Shur, M.L., Accounting for the influence of the product boundary on the field of a cylindrical defect, Defektoskopiya, 1976, no. 6, pp. 30–36.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sapozhnikov, A.B. Some simplest nonlinear calculations in the theory of magnetic flaw detection, Tr. Sib. Phys.-Tech. Inst, Tosmk State Univ., 1950, no. 30. 1950.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Dyakin
    • 1
  • O. V. Kudryashova
    • 1
  • V. Ya. Raevskii
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Mikheev Institute of Metal PhysicsUral Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations