Physical Mesomechanics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 52–64 | Cite as

Theory of Superplasticity and Fatigue of Polycrystalline Materials Based on Nanomechanics of Fracturing and Failure

  • G. P. CherepanovEmail author


Fracture nanomechanics is the study of the interconnected process of the growth and birth of cracks and dislocations in the nanoscale. In this paper, it is applied to superplasticity and fatigue of metals and other polycrystalline materials in order to derive the basic equations describing some main features of these phenomena, namely, the fatigue threshold and the enormous neck-free superplastic elongation. It is shown that in most metals and alloys the fatigue threshold is greater than one per cent of the value of fracture toughness. Using the concepts of fracture nanomechanics, we study the superplastic deformation and fracturing of polycrystalline materials under uniaxial extension and calculate the neck-free elongation to failure in terms of strain rate, stress and temperature. Then, we determine the optimum strain rate of the maximum superplastic elongation in terms of temperature, creep index and other material constants. Further, we estimate the critical size o f ultrafine grains necessary to stop the growth of microcracks and open way to the superplastic flow, and find the superplastic deformation of grains, their maximum-possible elongation and the activation energy of superplastic state. Also, we introduce the dimensionless A-number in order to characterize the capability of different materials in yielding the superplastic flow. A t a very high elongation the alloying boundary of grains proves to be broken by a periodical system o f dead fractures of some definite period. It is shown that experimental results of the testing of the Pb-62% Sn eutectic alloy and Zn-22% A l eutectoid alloy at T = 473 K have substantially supported the theory of superplasticity advanced herewith.


superplasticity fatigue fracturing failure nanomechanics crack dislocation ultrafine grain size threshold stress intensity factor elongation to failure optimum strain rate material characterization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Cracks in Solids, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1968, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 811–831.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherepanov, G.P., On the Crack Growth under Cyclic Loadings, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 1968, no. 6, pp. 924–940.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cherepanov, G.P. and Halmanov, H., On the Theory of Fatigue Crack Growth, J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 1972, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Mechanics of Brittle Fracture, Moscow: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Mechanics of Brittle Fracture, New York: McGraw–Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Fmcture Mechanics, Moscow: Institute of Computer Science, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paris, P.C., Testing for Very Slow Growth of Fatigue Cracks, DEL Research Corporation. Closed Loop 2, 1970, no. 5, pp. 11–49.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cherepanov, G.P., The Start of Growth of Micro–cracks and Dislocations, Sov. Appl. Mech., 1988, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1165–1183.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cherepanov, G.P., The Growth of Micro–cracks under Monotonic Loading, Sov. Appl. Mech., 1988, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 396–415.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherepanov, G.P., The Closing of Micro–cracks under Unloading and Generation of Reverse Dislocations, Sov. Appl. Mech., 1989, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 635–648.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cherepanov, G.P., On the Foundation of Fracture Mechanics: Fatigue and Creep Cracks in Quantum Fracture Mechanics, Sov. Appl. Mech., 1990, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 3–12.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Invariant Integrals in Continuum Mechanics, Sov. Appl. Mech., 1990, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3–16.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Richter, A., Verijenko, V.E., Adali, S., and Sutyrin, V., Dislocation Generation and Crack Growth under Monotonic Loading, J. Appl. Phys., 1995, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 6249–6265.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Methods of Fracture Mechanics: Solid Matter Physics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cherepanov, G.P., Nanofracture Mechanics Approach to Dislocation Generation and Fracturing: Invited Paper at the 12th U.S. Nat. Congr. Appl. Mech., Appl. Mech. Rev., 1994, vol. 47, no. 6, part 2, S326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Padmanabhan, K.A. and Davis, G.J., Superplasticity: Mechanical and Structural Aspects, Environmental Effects, Fundamentals and Applications, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Encyclopedia of Physics, Lerner, R.G., Trigg, G.L., Eds., New York: VCH Publ., 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Honeycomb, R.W.K., Plastic Deformations of Metals, London: Edward Arnold Publ., 1968.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawasaki, M. and Langdon, T.G., Grain Boundary Sliding in a Superplastic Zinc–Aluminum Alloy Processed Using Severe Plastic Deformation, Mater. Trans., 2008, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New York Academy of SciencesNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations