Physical Mesomechanics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 46–51 | Cite as

Rotation Versus Curvature Fractal Scaling in Bending Failure

  • Alberto CarpinteriEmail author
  • Federico Accornero


In the present work, an approach based on fractal geometry, that has been successfully applied for the tensile and the compressive behaviour of quasi-brittle materials, is followed in order to obtain a fractal scaling from three-point bending tests of concrete specimens. According to this approach, bending strength, fracture energy, and the critical kinematic parameter, represented by the localized rotation, are not defined with respect to canonical physical dimensions, but on fractal sets presenting noninteger dimensions. In the case of bending strength, the dimensional decrement of the reference area dG represents the weakening of the reacting cross section, whereas in the case of fracture energy the dimensional increment dG represents the roughness of the fracture surface. Furthermore, the kinematic parameter proves to be intermediate between a dimensionless rotation angle and a curvature, i.e., it moves from a generalized displacement to a deformation: its dimensional decrement dx represents the curvature localization along the beam span according to a lacunar fractal constituted by the infinite radial cracks converging to the center of curvature. As a consequence, the classical mechanical parameters are replaced by fractal quantities, which represent the actual material properties.


fractal scaling bending strength fracture energy rotation curvature 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Goldstein, R.V. and Vainshelbaum, V.M., Material Scale Length as a Measure of Fracture Toughness in Fracture Mechanics of Plastic Materials, Int. J. Fract., 1978, vol. 14, pp. 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carpinteri, A., Size Effect in Fracture Toughness Testing: A Dimensional Analysis Approach, in Proc. Int. Conf. Analytical and Experimental Fracture Mechanics, Roma, Italy, Sih, G.C., Mirabile, M., Eds., Alphen an den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980, pp. 785–797.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpinteri, A., Notch Sensitivity in Fracture Testing of Aggregative Materials, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1982, vol. 16, pp. 467481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Flow, Deformation and Fracture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Similarity, Self–Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics, New York: Springer, 1979.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Scaling, Self–Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeldovich, Y.B. and Barenblatt, G.I., On the Asymptotic Properties of Self–Similar Solutions of the Equations of Unsteady Gas Filtration, Dokl. USSR Acad. Sci” 1958, vol. 118, pp. 671–674.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barenblatt, G.I. and Botvina, L.R., Incomplete Self–Similarity of Fatigue in the Linear Range of Crack Growth, Fatig. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1980, vol. 3, pp. 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barenblatt, G.I. and Botvina, L.R., A Note Concerning Power–Type Constitutive Equations of Deformation and Fracture of Solids, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 1982, vol. 20, pp. 187–191.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barenblatt, G.I. and Botvina, L.R., Self–Similar Nature of Fatigue Failure: Damage Accumulation, Mech. Solid” 1983, vol. 18, pp. 160–164.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson, K.G., Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena, Phys. Rev. B, 1971, vol. 4, pp. 3174–3183.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson, K.G. and Kogut, J., The Renormalization Group and the s Expansion, Phys. Rep., 1974, vol. 12, pp. 75–199.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carpinteri, A., Fractal Nature of Material Microstructure and Size Effects on Apparent Mechanical Properties, Mech. Mater., 1994, vol. 18, pp. 89–101; (1992) Internal Reports, Laboratory of Fracture Mechanics, Politecnico di Torino, 1/92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carpinteri, A., Scaling Laws and Renormalization Groups for Strength and Toughness of Disordered Materials, Int. J. Solid. Struct., 1994, vol. 31, pp. 291–302.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldstein, R.V. and Mosolov, A.B., Fractal Cracks, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1992, vol. 56, pp. 563–571.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandelbrot, B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature, San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turcotte, D.L., Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barenblatt, G.I., The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Fracture, Adv. Appl. Mech., 1962, vol. 7, pp. 55–129.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carpinteri, A., Cusp Catastrophe Interpretation of Fracture Instability, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1989, vol. 37, pp. 567–582.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carpinteri, A. and Ferro, G., Size Effects on Tensile Fracture Properties: A Unified Explanation Based on Disorder and Fractality of Concrete Microstructure, Mater. Struct., 1994, vol. 27, pp. 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carpinteri, A. and Ferro, G., Scaling Behaviour and Dual Renormalization of Experimental Tensile Softening Responses, Mater. Struct., 1998, vol. 31, pp. 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carpinteri, A. and Chiaia, B., Multifractal Scaling Laws in the Breaking Behaviour of Disordered Materials, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 1997, vol. 8, pp. 135–150.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carpinteri, A., Chiaia, B., and Cornetti, P., A Scale–Invariant Cohesive Crack Model for Quasi–Brittle Materials, Eng. Fract. Mech” 2002, vol. 69, pp. 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carpinteri, A. and Corrado, M., An Extended (Fractal) Overlapping Crack Model to Describe Crushing Size–Scale Effects in Compression, J. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2009, vol. 16, pp. 2530–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    RILEM Technical Committee 50–FMC. Determination of the Fracture Energy of Mortar and Concrete by Means of Three–Point Bend Tests on Notched Beams, Mater. Struct., 1985, vol. 18, pp. 287–290.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations