Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 484, Issue 1, pp 66–70 | Cite as

The Deep Velocity Structure of the Southern Margin of the Siberian Craton with Respect to Baikal Rifting

  • V. V. MordvinovaEmail author
  • M. M. Kobelev
  • M. A. Khritova
  • E. Kh. Turutanov
  • E. A. Kobeleva
  • D. S. Trynkova
  • L. R. Tsydypova
GEOPHYSICS
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The models of the velocity structure of the southern margin of the ancient Siberian Craton are constructed for depths down to 80 km from teleseismic records by the method of longitudinal receiver function (P-to-S). The relationship between depth and surface structures revealed using the modeling indicates a submeridional convergence of the southwestern margin of the Siberian craton and the Central Asian mobile belt. This convergence caused sublatitudinal extension of the crust in the contact zone, and this extension could in turn have triggered the Baikal rifting in the southeastern margin of the craton.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 12-05-01024_a and 14-35-50697 mol_nr, including expeditionary grants nos. 14-05-10028 and 15-05-10085).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Evolution of Southern Part of Siberian Craton in the Precambrian, Ed. by E. V. Sklyarov (Siberian Branch Russ. Acad. Sci., Novosibirsk, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. Zorin, V. Mordvinova, E. Turutanov, et al., Tectonophysics 359 (3–4), 307–327 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. L. Kosarev, N. V. Petersen, L. P. Vinnik, et al., J. Geophys. Res. 98 (B3), 4437–4448 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Mordvinova, A. Deschamps, T. Dugarmaa, et al., Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 43 (2), 119–129 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. I. Lobkovskii, Geodynamics of Spreading and Subduction Zones and Two-Layer Tectonics of Plates (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu. A. Zorin, T. V. Balk, M. R. Novoselova, et al., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 7, 33–42 (1988).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. A. Zorin, V. G. Belichenko, E. Kh. Turutanov, et al., Tectonophysics 225, 361–378 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. I. Mel’nikova and N. A. Radziminovich, Dokl. Earth Sci. 416 (7), 1137–1140 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. A. San’kov, A. V. Lukhnev, A. V. Parfeevets, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. 436 (1), 159–164 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Mordvinova, L. P. Vinnik, G. L. Kosarev, et al., Dokl. Earth Sci. 372 (4), 716–720 (2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Emmerson, J. Jackson, D. McKenzie, et al., Geophys. J. Int. 167, 1233–1272 (2006). doi  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03075.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Barruol, A. Deschamps, J. Déverchère, et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 274, 221–233 (2008). doi  https://doi.org/10.1016/epsl.2008.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Nielsen and H. Thybo, Tectonophysics 470, 298–318 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. A. Letnikov, G. D. Feoktistov, N. V. Vilor, et al., Petrology and Fluid Regime of Continental Lithosphere (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. V. Ananyin and V. V. Mordvinova, Dokl. Earth Sci. 444 (2), 721–724 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Mordvinova
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. M. Kobelev
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. A. Khritova
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Kh. Turutanov
    • 1
  • E. A. Kobeleva
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. S. Trynkova
    • 1
  • L. R. Tsydypova
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia
  2. 2.Baikalian Branch, United Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia
  3. 3.Geological Institute, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesUlan-UdeRussia

Personalised recommendations