Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 483, Issue 1, pp 1418–1422 | Cite as

The First Quantitative Evaluation Data on Vendian Metamorphism in the Eastern Part of the Bashkir Meganticlinorium

  • S. G. Kovalev
  • V. N. Puchkov
  • S. S. Kovalev
  • S. I. Vysotskii
GEOLOGY
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This paper reports the data on the P–T parameters of the Vendian metamorphism within the eastern wing of the Bashkir Meganticlinorium. Regular near-EW variations in the P–T parameters are due to the fact that the Late Vendian Southern Urals developed under compression resulting from orogenic movements in the Timanides fold region. The stress metamorphism is specified by the “near-fault” nature, when the metamorphosed rock zones alternate with unaltered deposits.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 16-17-10192.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    A. A. Alekseev, G. V. Alekseeva, A. R. Galieva, and E. A. Timofeeva, Metamorphic Geology of Western Slope of the Southern Urals (Gilem, Ufa, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. M. Valizer and E. V. Dubinina, Izv. Chelyab. Nauchn. Tsentra, No. 3 (29), 27–33 (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. L. Dobretsov, Yu. G. Lavrent’ev, L. G. Ponomareva, and L. N. Pospelova, The Statistical Methods Used in Geology (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1974), Iss. 236, pp. 113–133 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. G. Kovalev and E. A. Timofeeva, Litosfera, No. 2, 27–48 (2017).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. I. Lennykh, Magmatism, Metamorphism, and Ore Formation in Geological History of the Urals (Ural Sci. Center USSR Acad. Sci., Sverdlovsk, 1974), pp. 170–183 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozhiganov, D.G., Geology of Ural-Tau Range and the Region of the Southern Kraka Peridotite Massif (Gosgeolizdat, Ufa, 1941) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. N. Puchkov, Geology of the Urals and Cis-Urals (Actual Problems on Stratigraphy, Tectonics, Geodynamics and Metallogeny) (DizainPoligrafServis, Ufa, 2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. J. Chopin, J. Petrol. 22 (4), 628–650 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U. A. Glasmacher, W. Bauer, U. Giese, P. Reynolds, B. Kober, L. Stroink, A. Alekseyev, V. N. Puchkov, and A. P. Willner, Precambrian Res. 110 (4), 185–213 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. J. Krogh and A. Raheim, Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 66 (1), 75–80 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. J. Massonne and By. W. Schreyer, Eur. J. Mineral., No. 1, 391–410 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. G. Kovalev
    • 1
  • V. N. Puchkov
    • 1
  • S. S. Kovalev
    • 1
  • S. I. Vysotskii
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geology, Ufa Scientific Center, Russian Academy of SciencesUfaRussia

Personalised recommendations