Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 482, Issue 1, pp 1234–1238 | Cite as

Influence of a Vertical Shift in the Current Velocity during Propagation of Contaminated Water from an Underwater Outfall under Stratified Conditions

  • V. A. Ivanov
  • V. V. Fomin
  • A. A. Polozok
Oceanology
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The features of the spatial structure of coastal water caused by the impact of a nonstationary deep source of waste under stratified conditions is studied using a numerical hydrothermal model. The task is solved for the case of contaminated water outfall in Golubaya Bay of the city of Sevastopol. It is found that the activity of the source is accompanied by a jet and a stream of contaminated water. The pycnocline layer is mostly polluted with the contaminated area reaching 0.3–0.5 km2. The increase in the vertical shift of the velocity of background current leads to the increase in the existing period of contaminated zones and displacement of the stream of waste water toward the free surface (the stream becomes more localized vertically). The fields of contamination, temperature, and salinity of water have a complex spatial structure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. A. Gol’dberg, V. I. Zats, Zh. M. Atsikhovskaya, et al., The Way for Simulating Processes of Water Self-Clarification in Sea Shelf Zone (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. G. Bondur and Yu. V. Grebenyuk, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa, No. 6, 49–67 (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. G. Bondur, V. M. Zhurbas, and Yu. V. Grebenuk, Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 49 (5), 595–606 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. A. Dulov, M. V. Yurovskaya, and I. E. Kozlov, Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 6, 43–60 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Blumberg, Z. Ji, and C. Ziegler, J. Hydraul. Eng. 122 (11), 610–616 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Zhang and E. Adams, J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (3), 233–241 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. P. Lyubimova, B. Roux, S. Luo, Y. N. Parshakova, et al., Nonlin. Proc. Geophys., No. 20, 257–266 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Ivanov and V. V. Fomin, Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 6, 89–103 (2016).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Smagorinsky, Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. L. Mellor and T. Yamada, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. N. Mikhailova and N. B. Shapiro, Morsk. Gidrofiz. Zh., No. 4, 28–50 (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Hydrophysical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSevastopolRussia

Personalised recommendations