Extinction Matrix of Atmospheric Ice Crystals with Their Preferred Spatial Orientation for the Visible and IR Regions
- 6 Downloads
The extinction matrix for an ensemble of hexagonal ice plates and columns is presented. The extinction matrix for droxtal and bullet crystals has been estimated. The calculations have been carried out for particles with characteristic dimensions from 10 to 100 μm and wavelengths from 0.3 to 10 μm assuming a gamma distribution of particle size with a width parameter μ < 4. It has been found that the extinction matrix of an ensemble of atmospheric ice crystals in the visible wavelength region is a unit matrix with a coefficient equal to the doubled area of the particle projection. The error of this representation does not exceed tenths of a percent and does not depend on the type of crystals and their spatial orientation. It has also been found that such a representation of the extinction matrix in the IR region is possible only for hexagonal columns, bullets, and similar crystals with a characteristic size greater than 20 μm for wavelengths less than 8 μm.
Keywords:extinction coefficient extinction matrix cirrus clouds physical optics light scattering ice crystals
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 16-35-60 089, 18‑05-00568, and 18-55-53 046), President of the Russian Federation (grant no. MK-2495.2017.5), and Mendeleev Foundation of Tomsk State University. Calculations of the quasi-horizontally oriented column were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (agreement no. 18-77-10 035).
- 1.Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
- 11.K. S. Kunz and R. J. Luebbers, Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics (FL: CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993).Google Scholar
- 15.A. A. Popov, Avtoref. Doctoral Dissertation in Mathematics and Physics (Tomsk, 1992).Google Scholar
- 19.A. A. Popov, “Polarized radiation extinction and backscattering cross-sections by a round plate in the physical optics approximation,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 1 (5), 19–24 (1988).Google Scholar
- 20.A. A. Popov and O. V. Shefer, “An analytical expression for the coefficient of optical attenuation by a polydisperse plate crystal system,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 2 (5), 532–535 (1989).Google Scholar
- 21.A. A. Popov and O. V. Shefer, “Estimate of the extinction of optical radiation by crystals lacking plane-parallel faces,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 3 (5), 456–461 (1990).Google Scholar
- 24.A. G. Borovoy, A. A. Popov, and O. V. Shefer, “Theoretical investigation of the spectral behavior of the optical radiation extinction coefficient of a system of oriented ice plates,” Opt. Atmos. Okeana 4 (9), 899–906 (1991).Google Scholar
- 25.O. V. Shefer, “Energy and polarization characteristics of optical radiation scattered forward by a plane crystal,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 19 (4), 244–248 (2006).Google Scholar
- 31.O. V. Shefer, “Energy and polarization features of the extinction of visible and near-IR wavelengths by large crystals,” Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved., Fiz. 57 (10), 61–68 (2014).Google Scholar
- 34.L. Tsang, J. A. Kong, and R. T. Shin, Theory of Microwave Remote Sensing (Wiley, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
- 36.N. V. Kustova and A. G. Borovoy, “The shadow function method in aureole scattering,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 19 (10), 778–783 (2006).Google Scholar