Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 393–402 | Cite as

Leaf Functional Traits and Biomass of Wetland Plants in Forest and Steppe Zones

  • D. A. RonzhinaEmail author
  • L. A. Ivanova
  • L. A. Ivanov


Leaf traits, the rate of gas exchange, and biomass were examined in five plurizonal species (Alisma plantago-aquatica L., Carex acuta L., Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roem. et Schult., Phalaris arundinacea L., and Typha angustifolia L.) of emergent plants growing in wetlands of forest (Middle Urals) and steppe (South Urals) zones. It was found that changes in the leaf thickness, leaf mass per area (LMA), the transpiration rate, and characteristics of the pigment complex associated with a rise in aridity were species-specific. Structural reorganization of the leaves of wetland plants growing in conditions of steppe wetland showed a general pattern of an increase in leaf density (1.2–2 times) and a reduction in leaf area (by 42–54%). This trend was accompanied by a reduction in the photosynthesis rate per 1 m2 (1.2–3.4 times) or per 1 mg of chlorophyll (by 29–63%). In two species, P. arundinacea and T. angustifolia, we detected a decrease in stomatal conductance by 2 and 4.8 times, respectively, in more arid conditions. Analysis of interspecific relations between plant productivity and leaf parameters has shown that plant biomass positively correlated with leaf area (r = 0.84, P < 0.01) and with the photosynthesis rate per leaf area unit (r = 0.97, P < 0.001) both in the regions of the Middle and South Urals. On the whole, structural changes in the leaves associated with adaptation of plant water relations to semiarid climate lead to a decrease in photosynthetic activity of leaves and, therefore, a decline of plant height and productivity of emergent plants growing in steppe wetland.


wetland plants above-ground biomass leaf traits LMA chlorophyll carotenoids photosynthesis transpiration water use efficiency aridity 



We are grateful to the personnel of Orenburgskii Wildlife Preservation for their assistance in our investigations.


This work was supported by the Russian Federal Budget (project no. АААА-А17-117072810011-1).


The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    Wetzel, R.G., Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems, San Diego: Academic, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ronzhina, D.A. and P’yankov, V.I., Structure of the photosynthetic apparatus in leaves of freshwater hydrophytes: 2. Quantitative characterization of leaf mesophyll and the functional activity of leaves with different degrees of submersion, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 48, pp. 723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nekrasova, G.F., Ronzhina, D.A., Maleva, M.G., and P’yankov, V.I., Photosynthetic metabolism and activity of carboxylating enzymes in emergent, floating, and submersed leaves of hydrophytes, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 50, pp. 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ronzhina, D.A., Nekrasova, G.F., and P’yankov, V.I., Comparative characterization of the pigment complex in emergent, floating, and submerged leaves of hydrophytes, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2004, vol. 51, pp. 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ronzhina, D.A. and P’yankov, V.I., Structure of the photosynthetic apparatus in leaves of freshwater hydrophytes: 1. General characteristics of the leaf mesophyll and a comparison with terrestrial plants, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 48, pp. 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voronin, P.Yu., Ivanova, L.A., Ronzhina, D.A., Ivanov, L.A., Anenkhonov, O.A., Black, C.C., Gunin, P.D., and P’yankov, V.I., Structural and functional changes in the leaves of plants from steppe communities as affected by aridization of the Eurasian climate, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 50, pp. 604–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivanov, L.A., Ronzhina, D.A., and Ivanova, L.A., Changes in leaf characteristics as indicator of the alteration of functional types of steppe plants along the aridity gradient, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2008, vol. 55, pp. 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ivanov, L.A., Ivanova, L.A., Ronzhina, D.A., and Yudina, P.K., Changes in the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in the leaves of steppe plants along a latitudinal gradient in South Ural, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2013, vol. 60, pp. 812–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yudina, P.K., Ivanova, L.A., Ronzhina, D.A., Zolotareva, N.V., and Ivanov, L.A., Variations of leaf characteristics and pigment contents in three species of stepper plants depending on the climate aridization, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 64, pp. 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gamalei, Yu.V., Signs of xeromorphism, in Pustyni Zaaltaiskoi Gobi: kharakteristika rastenii-dominantov (Deserts of the Zaaltai Gobi: A Characteristic of Dominant Plants), Leningrad: Nauka, 1988, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ivanova, L.A., Yudina, P.K., Ronzhina, D.A., Ivanov, L.A., and Hölzel, N., Quantitative mesophyll parameters rather than whole-leaf traits predict response of C3 steppe plants to aridity, New Phytol., 2018, vol. 217, pp. 558–570.
  12. 12.
    Nekrasova, G.F., Ronzhina, D.A., and Korobitsyna, E.B., Photosynthetic apparatus in developing submerged, floating, and aerial leaves of hydrophytes, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1998, vol. 45, pp. 456–464.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuura, K. and Willmott, C.J., Terrestrial air temperature: 1900–2010 gridded monthly time series, 2012. Global2011/README.GlobalTsT2011.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsuura, K. and Willmott, C.J., Terrestrial precipitation: 1900–2010 gridded monthly time series, 2012. http:// Precip_revised_3.02/README.GlobalTsP2011.htmlGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences, Vol. XI: Encyclopedia of World Climatology, Oliver, J.E. and Fairbridge, R.W., Eds., New York: van Nostrand Reinold, 1987.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lichtenthaler, H.K. and Wellburn, A.R., Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1983, vol. 603, pp. 591–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S., III, and Pons, T.L., Plant Physiological Ecology, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Migalina, S.V., Ivanova, L.A., and Makhnev, A.K., Size of the leaf as a marker of birch productivity at a distance from the climatic optimum, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2009, vol. 56, pp. 858–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scoffoni, C., Rawls, M., McKown, A., Cochard, H., and Sack, L., Decline of leaf hydraulic conductance with dehydration: relationship to leaf size and venation architecture, Plant Physiol., 2011, vol. 156, pp. 832–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheremet'ev, S.N., Travy na gradiente vlazhnosti pochvy (vodnyi obmen i strukturno-funktsional’naya organizatsiya) (Herbs on the Gradient of Soil Moisture (Water Exchange and Structural and Functional Organization)), Moscow: KMK, 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goryshina, T.K., Ekologiya rastenii (Plant Ecology), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sack, L., Cowan, P.D., Jaikumar, N., and Holbrook, N.M., The hydrology of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species, Plant Cell Environ., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 1343–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muneepeerakul, C.P., Muneepeerakul, R., Miralles-Wilhelm, F., Rinaldo, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Dynamics of wetland vegetation under multiple stresses: a case study of changes in sawgrass trait, structure, and productivity under coupled plant–soil–microbe dynamics, Ecohydrology, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 757–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pagter, M., Bragato, C., and Brix, H., Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit, Aquat. Bot., 2005, vol. 81, pp. 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miao, S., Sindhøj, E., and Edelstein, C., Allometric relationships of field populations of two clonal species with contrasting life histories, Cladium jamaicense and Typha domingensis, Aquat. Bot., 2008, vol. 88, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, S., Pezeshki, S.R., and Goodwin, S., Effects of soil moisture regimes on photosynthesis and growth in cattail (Typha latifolia), Acta Oecologica, 2004, vol. 25, pp. 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ivanova, L.A., Petrov, M.S., and Kadushnikov, R.M., Determination of mesophyll diffusion resistance in Chamaerion angustifolium by the method of three-dimensional reconstruction of the leaf cell packing, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2006, vol. 53, pp. 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kodama, N., Cousins, A., Tu, K.P., and Barbour, M.M., Spatial variation in photosynthetic CO2 carbon and oxygen isotope discrimination along leaves of the monocot triticale (Triticum × Secale) relates to mesophyll conductance and the Péclet effect, Plant Cell Environ., 2011, vol. 34, pp. 1548–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oguchi, R., Hikosaka, K., and Hirose, T., Does the photosynthetic light-acclimation need change in leaf anatomy? Plant Cell Environ., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Voronin, P.Yu., Rakhmankulova, Z.F., Shuiskaya, E.V., Maevskaya, S.N., Nikolaeva, M.K., Maksimov, A.P., Maksimov, T.Kh., Myasoedov, N.A., Balnokin, Yu.V., Rymar’, V.P., Valdaiskikh, V.V., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., New method for quantitative determination of water potential of mesophyll cells’ apoplast in substomatal cavity of the leaf, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 64, pp. 452–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Ronzhina
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • L. A. Ivanova
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. A. Ivanov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Botanical Garden, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesEkaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Tyumen State UniversityTyumenRussia

Personalised recommendations